Jennifer S Albrecht1, Lindsay Croft1, Daniel J Morgan2, Mary-Claire Roghmann3. 1. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. 2. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, MD. 3. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, MD. Electronic address: mroghman@epi.umaryland.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To explore current use and perceptions of glove and gown use in nursing homes. DESIGN: Qualitative study using focus groups and semi-structured interviews. SETTING: Three community-based nursing homes in Maryland. PARTICIPANTS: Direct care staff, administrators, and residents. METHODS: We conducted three focus groups among nursing home staff, one focus group among nursing home administrators, and five interviews with residents. Topic guides were created based on our recent study results and a review of the literature. Two investigators separately analyzed the transcribed recordings and identified recurrent themes. RESULTS: Direct care staff reported using gowns and gloves primarily as self-protection against contact with bodily fluids, not to prevent MRSA transmission. Glove use was described as common and more acceptable to staff and residents than gown use. Administrators were surprised that MRSA transmission to health care worker hands and clothing occurred during activities when direct care staff perceives no contact with bodily fluids. Staff and administrators expressed willingness to use gowns and gloves for high-risk care activities, particularly if use is targeted toward specific types of residents such as those with pressure ulcers. There was a knowledge deficit about MRSA transmission and infection among direct care staff and residents. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study will inform a strategy to reduce MRSA transmission in long-term care.
OBJECTIVES: To explore current use and perceptions of glove and gown use in nursing homes. DESIGN: Qualitative study using focus groups and semi-structured interviews. SETTING: Three community-based nursing homes in Maryland. PARTICIPANTS: Direct care staff, administrators, and residents. METHODS: We conducted three focus groups among nursing home staff, one focus group among nursing home administrators, and five interviews with residents. Topic guides were created based on our recent study results and a review of the literature. Two investigators separately analyzed the transcribed recordings and identified recurrent themes. RESULTS: Direct care staff reported using gowns and gloves primarily as self-protection against contact with bodily fluids, not to prevent MRSA transmission. Glove use was described as common and more acceptable to staff and residents than gown use. Administrators were surprised that MRSA transmission to health care worker hands and clothing occurred during activities when direct care staff perceives no contact with bodily fluids. Staff and administrators expressed willingness to use gowns and gloves for high-risk care activities, particularly if use is targeted toward specific types of residents such as those with pressure ulcers. There was a knowledge deficit about MRSA transmission and infection among direct care staff and residents. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study will inform a strategy to reduce MRSA transmission in long-term care.
Authors: Martin E Evans; Stephen M Kralovic; Loretta A Simbartl; Ron W Freyberg; D Scott Obrosky; Gary A Roselle; Rajiv Jain Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 2.918
Authors: Catherine Crawford Cohen; Monika Pogorzelska-Maziarz; Carolyn T A Herzig; Eileen J Carter; Ragnhildur Bjarnadottir; Patricia Semeraro; Jasmine L Travers; Patricia W Stone Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2015-05-22 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Zhiqiu Ye; Dana B Mukamel; Susan S Huang; Yue Li; Helena Temkin-Greener Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2015-03-23 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Lona Mody; Carol A Kauffman; Susan Donabedian; Marcus Zervos; Suzanne F Bradley Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2008-05-01 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Alison D Lydecker; Patience A Osei; Lisa Pineles; J Kristie Johnson; Jacquelyn Meisel; O Colin Stine; Laurence Magder; Ayse P Gurses; Joan Hebden; Cagla Oruc; Lona Mody; Kara Jacobs Slifka; Nimalie D Stone; Mary-Claire Roghmann Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2020-10-20 Impact factor: 3.254