OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of automated coronary atherosclerotic plaque quantification (QCT) by different users (expert/non-expert/automatic). METHODS: One hundred fifty coronary artery segments from 142 patients who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) were analyzed. Minimal lumen area (MLA), maximal lumen area stenosis percentage (%AS), mean plaque burden percentage (%PB), and plaque volume were measured semi-automatically by expert, non-expert, and fully automatic QCT analyses, and then compared to IVUS. RESULTS: Between IVUS and expert QCT analysis, the correlation coefficients (r) for the MLA, %AS, %PB, and plaque volume were excellent: 0.89 (p < 0.001), 0.84 (p < 0.001), 0.91 (p < 0.001), and 0.94 (p < 0.001), respectively. There were no significant differences in the mean parameters (all p values >0.05) except %AS (p = 0.01). The automatic QCT analysis showed comparable performance to non-expert QCT analysis, showing correlation coefficients (r) of the MLA (0.80 vs. 0.82), %AS (0.82 vs. 0.80), %PB (0.84 vs. 0.73), and plaque volume (0.84 vs. 0.79) when they were compared to IVUS, respectively. CONCLUSION: Fully automatic QCT analysis showed clinical utility compared with IVUS, as well as a compelling performance when compared with semiautomatic analyses. KEY POINTS: • Coronary CTA enables the assessment of coronary atherosclerotic plaque. • High-risk plaque characteristics and overall plaque burden can predict future cardiac events. • Coronary atherosclerotic plaque quantification is currently unfeasible in practice. • Quantitative computed tomography coronary plaque analysis software (QCT) enables feasible plaque quantification. • Fully automatic QCT analysis shows excellent performance.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of automated coronary atherosclerotic plaque quantification (QCT) by different users (expert/non-expert/automatic). METHODS: One hundred fifty coronary artery segments from 142 patients who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) were analyzed. Minimal lumen area (MLA), maximal lumen area stenosis percentage (%AS), mean plaque burden percentage (%PB), and plaque volume were measured semi-automatically by expert, non-expert, and fully automatic QCT analyses, and then compared to IVUS. RESULTS: Between IVUS and expert QCT analysis, the correlation coefficients (r) for the MLA, %AS, %PB, and plaque volume were excellent: 0.89 (p < 0.001), 0.84 (p < 0.001), 0.91 (p < 0.001), and 0.94 (p < 0.001), respectively. There were no significant differences in the mean parameters (all p values >0.05) except %AS (p = 0.01). The automatic QCT analysis showed comparable performance to non-expert QCT analysis, showing correlation coefficients (r) of the MLA (0.80 vs. 0.82), %AS (0.82 vs. 0.80), %PB (0.84 vs. 0.73), and plaque volume (0.84 vs. 0.79) when they were compared to IVUS, respectively. CONCLUSION: Fully automatic QCT analysis showed clinical utility compared with IVUS, as well as a compelling performance when compared with semiautomatic analyses. KEY POINTS: • Coronary CTA enables the assessment of coronary atherosclerotic plaque. • High-risk plaque characteristics and overall plaque burden can predict future cardiac events. • Coronary atherosclerotic plaque quantification is currently unfeasible in practice. • Quantitative computed tomography coronary plaque analysis software (QCT) enables feasible plaque quantification. • Fully automatic QCT analysis shows excellent performance.
Authors: Bernhard Bischoff; Felix G Meinel; Alessandra Del Prete; Maximilian F Reiser; Hans-Christoph Becker Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2013-09-12 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Udo Hoffmann; Fabian Bamberg; Claudia U Chae; John H Nichols; Ian S Rogers; Sujith K Seneviratne; Quynh A Truong; Ricardo C Cury; Suhny Abbara; Michael D Shapiro; Jamaluddin Moloo; Javed Butler; Maros Ferencik; Hang Lee; Ik-Kyung Jang; Blair A Parry; David F Brown; James E Udelson; Stephan Achenbach; Thomas J Brady; John T Nagurney Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-05-05 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Julie M Miller; Carlos E Rochitte; Marc Dewey; Armin Arbab-Zadeh; Hiroyuki Niinuma; Ilan Gottlieb; Narinder Paul; Melvin E Clouse; Edward P Shapiro; John Hoe; Albert C Lardo; David E Bush; Albert de Roos; Christopher Cox; Jeffery Brinker; João A C Lima Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-11-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Nico Bruining; Jos R T C Roelandt; Alessandro Palumbo; Ludovico La Grutta; Filippo Cademartiri; Pim J de Feijter; Nico Mollet; Ron T van Domburg; P W Serruys; Ronald Hamers Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2007-05-01 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Rine Nakanishi; Wendy S Post; Kazuhiro Osawa; Eranthi Jayawardena; Michael Kim; Nasim Sheidaee; Negin Nezarat; Sina Rahmani; Nicholas Kim; Nicolai Hathiramani; Shriraj Susarla; Frank Palella; Mallory Witt; Michael J Blaha; Todd T Brown; Lawrence Kingsley; Sabina A Haberlen; Christopher Dailing; Matthew J Budoff Journal: Coron Artery Dis Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 1.439
Authors: Hyuk-Jae Chang; Fay Y Lin; Sang-Eun Lee; Daniele Andreini; Jeroen Bax; Filippo Cademartiri; Kavitha Chinnaiyan; Benjamin J W Chow; Edoardo Conte; Ricardo C Cury; Gudrun Feuchtner; Martin Hadamitzky; Yong-Jin Kim; Jonathon Leipsic; Erica Maffei; Hugo Marques; Fabian Plank; Gianluca Pontone; Gilbert L Raff; Alexander R van Rosendael; Todd C Villines; Harald G Weirich; Subhi J Al'Aref; Lohendran Baskaran; Iksung Cho; Ibrahim Danad; Donghee Han; Ran Heo; Ji Hyun Lee; Asim Rivzi; Wijnand J Stuijfzand; Heidi Gransar; Yao Lu; Ji Min Sung; Hyung-Bok Park; Daniel S Berman; Matthew J Budoff; Habib Samady; Leslee J Shaw; Peter H Stone; Renu Virmani; Jagat Narula; James K Min Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2018-06-05 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Veit Sandfort; David A Bluemke; Jose Vargas; Jeffrey A Brinker; Gary Gerstenblith; Thomas Kickler; Gang Zheng; Ji Li; Shaoguang Chen; Hong Lai; Elliot K Fishman; Shenghan Lai Journal: J Addict Med Date: 2017 Mar/Apr Impact factor: 3.702
Authors: Rolf Symons; Justin Z Morris; Colin O Wu; Amir Pourmorteza; Mark A Ahlman; João A C Lima; Marcus Y Chen; Marissa Mallek; Veit Sandfort; David A Bluemke Journal: Radiology Date: 2016-09-16 Impact factor: 11.105