Literature DB >> 19406338

Coronary computed tomography angiography for early triage of patients with acute chest pain: the ROMICAT (Rule Out Myocardial Infarction using Computer Assisted Tomography) trial.

Udo Hoffmann1, Fabian Bamberg, Claudia U Chae, John H Nichols, Ian S Rogers, Sujith K Seneviratne, Quynh A Truong, Ricardo C Cury, Suhny Abbara, Michael D Shapiro, Jamaluddin Moloo, Javed Butler, Maros Ferencik, Hang Lee, Ik-Kyung Jang, Blair A Parry, David F Brown, James E Udelson, Stephan Achenbach, Thomas J Brady, John T Nagurney.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to determine the usefulness of coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) in patients with acute chest pain.
BACKGROUND: Triage of chest pain patients in the emergency department remains challenging.
METHODS: We used an observational cohort study in chest pain patients with normal initial troponin and nonischemic electrocardiogram. A 64-slice coronary CTA was performed before admission to detect coronary plaque and stenosis (>50% luminal narrowing). Results were not disclosed. End points were acute coronary syndrome (ACS) during index hospitalization and major adverse cardiac events during 6-month follow-up.
RESULTS: Among 368 patients (mean age 53 +/- 12 years, 61% men), 31 had ACS (8%). By coronary CTA, 50% of these patients were free of coronary artery disease (CAD), 31% had nonobstructive disease, and 19% had inconclusive or positive computed tomography for significant stenosis. Sensitivity and negative predictive value for ACS were 100% (n = 183 of 368; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 98% to 100%) and 100% (95% CI: 89% to 100%), respectively, with the absence of CAD and 77% (95% CI: 59% to 90%) and 98% (n = 300 of 368, 95% CI: 95% to 99%), respectively, with significant stenosis by coronary CTA. Specificity of presence of plaque and stenosis for ACS were 54% (95% CI: 49% to 60%) and 87% (95% CI: 83% to 90%), respectively. Only 1 ACS occurred in the absence of calcified plaque. Both the extent of coronary plaque and presence of stenosis predicted ACS independently and incrementally to Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction risk score (area under curve: 0.88, 0.82, vs. 0.63, respectively; all p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Fifty percent of patients with acute chest pain and low to intermediate likelihood of ACS were free of CAD by computed tomography and had no ACS. Given the large number of such patients, early coronary CTA may significantly improve patient management in the emergency department.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19406338      PMCID: PMC2747766          DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.01.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  41 in total

1.  Diagnostic marker cooperative study for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J Zimmerman; R Fromm; D Meyer; A Boudreaux; C C Wun; R Smalling; B Davis; G Habib; R Roberts
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-04-06       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Disagreement between formal and medical record criteria for the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  John T Nagurney; David F M Brown; Claudia Chae; Yuchiao Chang; Won G Chung; Hilarie Cranmer; Li Dan; Jonathan Fisher; Shamai Grossman; Usha Tedrow; Kent Lewandrowski; I K Jang
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.451

3.  Use of the acute cardiac ischemia time-insensitive predictive instrument (ACI-TIPI) to assist with triage of patients with chest pain or other symptoms suggestive of acute cardiac ischemia. A multicenter, controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  H P Selker; J R Beshansky; J L Griffith; T P Aufderheide; D S Ballin; S A Bernard; S G Crespo; J A Feldman; S S Fish; W B Gibler; D A Kiez; R A McNutt; A W Moulton; J P Ornato; P J Podrid; J H Pope; D N Salem; M R Sayre; R H Woolard
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Dose reduction in multislice computed tomography.

Authors:  Walter Hundt; Friedemann Rust; Axel Stäbler; Heiko Wolff; Christoph Suess; Maximillian Reiser
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Comparison of stress/rest myocardial perfusion tomography, dipyridamole and dobutamine stress echocardiography for the detection of coronary disease in hypertensive patients with chest pain and positive exercise test.

Authors:  G Fragasso; C Lu; P Dabrowski; P Pagnotta; I Sheiban; S L Chierchia
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Cost-effectiveness of a coronary care unit versus an intermediate care unit for emergency department patients with chest pain.

Authors:  A N Tosteson; L Goldman; I S Udvarhelyi; T H Lee
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1996-07-15       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Practical implementation of the guidelines for unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the emergency department: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology (Subcommittee on Acute Cardiac Care), Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, and Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group, in Collaboration With the Society of Chest Pain Centers.

Authors:  W Brian Gibler; Christopher P Cannon; Andra L Blomkalns; Douglas M Char; Barbara J Drew; Judd E Hollander; Allan S Jaffe; Robert L Jesse; L Kristin Newby; E Magnus Ohman; Eric D Peterson; Charles V Pollack
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-05-24       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Noninvasive coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography.

Authors:  Martin H K Hoffmann; Heshui Shi; Bernd L Schmitz; Florian T Schmid; Michael Lieberknecht; Ralph Schulze; Bernd Ludwig; Ulf Kroschel; Norbert Jahnke; Winfried Haerer; Hans-Juergen Brambs; Andrik J Aschoff
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-05-25       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Prognostic implications of elevated troponin in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome but no critical epicardial coronary disease: a TACTICS-TIMI-18 substudy.

Authors:  Hisham Dokainish; Manu Pillai; Sabina A Murphy; Peter M DiBattiste; Marc J Schweiger; Amir Lotfi; David A Morrow; Christopher P Cannon; Eugene Braunwald; Nasser Lakkis
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-01-04       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Technetium-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging in the emergency room evaluation of chest pain.

Authors:  T C Hilton; R C Thompson; H J Williams; R Saylors; H Fulmer; S A Stowers
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  164 in total

1.  Usefulness of electrocardiographic parameters as compared with computed tomography measures of left atrial volume enlargement: from the ROMICAT trial.

Authors:  Quynh A Truong; Elizabeth M Charipar; Leon M Ptaszek; Carolyn Taylor; Joao D Fontes; Matthias Kriegel; Thomas Irlbeck; Amir A Mahabadi; Ron Blankstein; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 1.438

2.  Assessing risk in acute chest pain: The value of stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients admitted through the emergency department.

Authors:  Faisal Nabi; Su Min Chang; Jiaqiong Xu; Elizabeth Gigliotti; John J Mahmarian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Patient-centered imaging.

Authors:  E Gordon Depuey; John J Mahmarian; Todd D Miller; Andrew J Einstein; Christopher L Hansen; Thomas A Holly; Edward J Miller; Donna M Polk; L Samuel Wann
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Clinical indications for cardiac computed tomography. From the Working Group of the Cardiac Radiology Section of the Italian Society of Medical Radiology (SIRM).

Authors:  E di Cesare; I Carbone; A Carriero; M Centonze; F De Cobelli; R De Rosa; P Di Renzi; A Esposito; R Faletti; R Fattori; M Francone; A Giovagnoni; L La Grutta; G Ligabue; L Lovato; R Marano; M Midiri; L Natale; A Romagnoli; V Russo; F Sardanelli; F Cademartiri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 5.  The role of non-invasive imaging in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  C Roobottom; G Mitchell; S Iyengar
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  Prognosis in the era of comparative effectiveness research: where is nuclear cardiology now and where should it be?

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Fadi G Hage; Daniel S Berman; Rory Hachamovitch; Ami Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Emergency department assessment of acute-onset chest pain: contemporary approaches and their consequences.

Authors:  Thomas C Gerber; Michael C Kontos; Birgit Kantor
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 7.616

8.  The potential role for the use of cardiac computed tomography angiography for the acute chest pain patient in the emergency department.

Authors:  Sean R Wilson; James K Min
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  The potential role for the use of cardiac computed tomography angiography for the acute chest pain patient in the emergency department: a cautionary viewpoint.

Authors:  Robert Hendel; Naim Dahdah
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Single resting hsTnT level predicts abnormal myocardial stress test in acute chest pain patients with normal initial standard troponin.

Authors:  Waleed Ahmed; Christopher L Schlett; Shanmugam Uthamalingam; Quynh A Truong; Wolfgang Koenig; Ian S Rogers; Ron Blankstein; John T Nagurney; Ahmed Tawakol; James L Januzzi; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.