Literature DB >> 25994109

Prediction of remission in obsessive compulsive disorder using a novel machine learning strategy.

Kathleen D Askland1, Sarah Garnaat1, Nicholas J Sibrava2, Christina L Boisseau1, David Strong3, Maria Mancebo1, Benjamin Greenberg1, Steve Rasmussen1, Jane Eisen1.   

Abstract

The study objective was to apply machine learning methodologies to identify predictors of remission in a longitudinal sample of 296 adults with a primary diagnosis of obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). Random Forests is an ensemble machine learning algorithm that has been successfully applied to large-scale data analysis across vast biomedical disciplines, though rarely in psychiatric research or for application to longitudinal data. When provided with 795 raw and composite scores primarily from baseline measures, Random Forest regression prediction explained 50.8% (5000-run average, 95% bootstrap confidence interval [CI]: 50.3-51.3%) of the variance in proportion of time spent remitted. Machine performance improved when only the most predictive 24 items were used in a reduced analysis. Consistently high-ranked predictors of longitudinal remission included Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) items, NEO items and subscale scores, Y-BOCS symptom checklist cleaning/washing compulsion score, and several self-report items from social adjustment scales. Random Forest classification was able to distinguish participants according to binary remission outcomes with an error rate of 24.6% (95% bootstrap CI: 22.9-26.2%). Our results suggest that clinically-useful prediction of remission may not require an extensive battery of measures. Rather, a small set of assessment items may efficiently distinguish high- and lower-risk patients and inform clinical decision-making.
Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  obsessive compulsive disorder; risk factors; statistics

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25994109      PMCID: PMC5466447          DOI: 10.1002/mpr.1463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res        ISSN: 1049-8931            Impact factor:   4.035


  46 in total

Review 1.  Revising axis V for DSM-IV: a review of measures of social functioning.

Authors:  H H Goldman; A E Skodol; T R Lave
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 18.112

2.  Power of data mining methods to detect genetic associations and interactions.

Authors:  Annette M Molinaro; Nicholas Carriero; Robert Bjornson; Patricia Hartge; Nathaniel Rothman; Nilanjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 0.444

3.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Suicidal ideation among adults with arthritis: prevalence and subgroups at highest risk. Data from the 2007-2008 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Authors:  Maria G Tektonidou; Abhijit Dasgupta; Michael M Ward
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.794

5.  The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale. II. Validity.

Authors:  W K Goodman; L H Price; S A Rasmussen; C Mazure; P Delgado; G R Heninger; D S Charney
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1989-11

6.  The Contemplation Ladder: validation of a measure of readiness to consider smoking cessation.

Authors:  L Biener; D B Abrams
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.267

7.  Reliability and validity of the longitudinal interval follow-up evaluation for assessing outcome of anxiety disorders.

Authors:  M G Warshaw; M B Keller; R L Stout
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.791

8.  Five-year course of obsessive-compulsive disorder: predictors of remission and relapse.

Authors:  Jane L Eisen; Nicholas J Sibrava; Christina L Boisseau; Maria C Mancebo; Robert L Stout; Anthony Pinto; Steven A Rasmussen
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.384

9.  Predictors of drug treatment response in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Authors:  L Ravizza; G Barzega; S Bellino; F Bogetto; G Maina
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.384

10.  The Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation. A comprehensive method for assessing outcome in prospective longitudinal studies.

Authors:  M B Keller; P W Lavori; B Friedman; E Nielsen; J Endicott; P McDonald-Scott; N C Andreasen
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1987-06
View more
  14 in total

1.  Prediction of remission in obsessive compulsive disorder using a novel machine learning strategy.

Authors:  Kathleen D Askland; Sarah Garnaat; Nicholas J Sibrava; Christina L Boisseau; David Strong; Maria Mancebo; Benjamin Greenberg; Steve Rasmussen; Jane Eisen
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 4.035

2.  General personality dimensions, impairment and treatment response in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Authors:  Jack Samuels; O Joseph Bienvenu; Janice Krasnow; Ying Wang; Marco A Grados; Bernadette Cullen; Fernando S Goes; Brion Maher; Benjamin D Greenberg; Nicole C Mclaughlin; Steven A Rasmussen; Abby J Fyer; James A Knowles; James T Mccracken; John Piacentini; Dan Geller; S Evelyn Stewart; Dennis L Murphy; Yin-Yao Shugart; Mark A Riddle; Gerald Nestadt
Journal:  Personal Ment Health       Date:  2019-12-20

3.  Prediction of outcome in internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy for paediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder: A machine learning approach.

Authors:  Fabian Lenhard; Sebastian Sauer; Erik Andersson; Kristoffer Nt Månsson; David Mataix-Cols; Christian Rück; Eva Serlachius
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 4.035

Review 4.  Supervised Machine Learning: A Brief Primer.

Authors:  Tammy Jiang; Jaimie L Gradus; Anthony J Rosellini
Journal:  Behav Ther       Date:  2020-05-16

5.  Symptom dimensions in obsessive-compulsive disorder as predictors of neurobiology and treatment response.

Authors:  Anders Lillevik Thorsen; Gerd Kvale; Bjarne Hansen; Odile A van den Heuvel
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Psychiatry       Date:  2018-02-23

6.  Prostate cancer prediction using the random forest algorithm that takes into account transrectal ultrasound findings, age, and serum levels of prostate-specific antigen.

Authors:  Li-Hong Xiao; Pei-Ran Chen; Zhong-Ping Gou; Yong-Zhong Li; Mei Li; Liang-Cheng Xiang; Ping Feng
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.285

7.  Personalized Medication Response Prediction for Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: Learning in the Model Space vs. Learning in the Data Space.

Authors:  Hin K Wong; Paul A Tiffin; Michael J Chappell; Thomas E Nichols; Patrick R Welsh; Orla M Doyle; Boryana C Lopez-Kolkovska; Sarah K Inglis; David Coghill; Yuan Shen; Peter Tiño
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Novel ensemble method for the prediction of response to fluvoxamine treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Authors:  Hesam Hasanpour; Ramak Ghavamizadeh Meibodi; Keivan Navi; Sareh Asadi
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 2.570

9.  Fluvoxamine treatment response prediction in obsessive-compulsive disorder: association rule mining approach.

Authors:  Hesam Hasanpour; Ramak Ghavamizadeh Meibodi; Keivan Navi; Jamal Shams; Sareh Asadi; Abolhassan Ahmadiani
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 2.570

10.  Assessing ADHD symptoms in children and adults: evaluating the role of objective measures.

Authors:  Theresa S Emser; Blair A Johnston; J Douglas Steele; Sandra Kooij; Lisa Thorell; Hanna Christiansen
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 3.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.