Fabian Lenhard1,2, Sebastian Sauer3, Erik Andersson1, Kristoffer Nt Månsson4,5, David Mataix-Cols1,2, Christian Rück1,2, Eva Serlachius1,2. 1. Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. 2. Stockholm Healthcare Services, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden. 3. FOM University of Applied Sciences for Economics and Management, Essen, Germany. 4. Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. 5. Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There are no consistent predictors of treatment outcome in paediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). One reason for this might be the use of suboptimal statistical methodology. Machine learning is an approach to efficiently analyse complex data. Machine learning has been widely used within other fields, but has rarely been tested in the prediction of paediatric mental health treatment outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To test four different machine learning methods in the prediction of treatment response in a sample of paediatric OCD patients who had receivedInternet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy (ICBT). METHODS:Participants were 61 adolescents (12-17 years) who enrolled in a randomized controlled trial and received ICBT. All clinical baseline variables were used to predict strictly defined treatment response status three months after ICBT. Four machine learning algorithms were implemented. For comparison, we also employed a traditional logistic regression approach. RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression could not detect any significant predictors. In contrast, all four machine learning algorithms performed well in the prediction of treatment response, with 75 to 83% accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that machine learning algorithms can successfully be applied to predict paediatric OCD treatment outcome. Validation studies and studies in other disorders are warranted.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: There are no consistent predictors of treatment outcome in paediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). One reason for this might be the use of suboptimal statistical methodology. Machine learning is an approach to efficiently analyse complex data. Machine learning has been widely used within other fields, but has rarely been tested in the prediction of paediatric mental health treatment outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To test four different machine learning methods in the prediction of treatment response in a sample of paediatric OCDpatients who had received Internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy (ICBT). METHODS:Participants were 61 adolescents (12-17 years) who enrolled in a randomized controlled trial and received ICBT. All clinical baseline variables were used to predict strictly defined treatment response status three months after ICBT. Four machine learning algorithms were implemented. For comparison, we also employed a traditional logistic regression approach. RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression could not detect any significant predictors. In contrast, all four machine learning algorithms performed well in the prediction of treatment response, with 75 to 83% accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that machine learning algorithms can successfully be applied to predict paediatric OCD treatment outcome. Validation studies and studies in other disorders are warranted.
Authors: David Mataix-Cols; Lorena Fernández de la Cruz; Ashley E Nordsletten; Fabian Lenhard; Kayoko Isomura; Helen Blair Simpson Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 49.548
Authors: Erik Andersson; Erik Hedman; Jesper Enander; Diana Radu Djurfeldt; Brjánn Ljótsson; Simon Cervenka; Josef Isung; Cecilia Svanborg; David Mataix-Cols; Viktor Kaldo; Gerhard Andersson; Nils Lindefors; Christian Rück Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: L Scahill; M A Riddle; M McSwiggin-Hardin; S I Ort; R A King; W K Goodman; D Cicchetti; J F Leckman Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 1997-06 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Erik Andersson; Brjánn Ljótsson; Erik Hedman; Viktor Kaldo; Björn Paxling; Gerhard Andersson; Nils Lindefors; Christian Rück Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2011-08-03 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Oskar Flygare; Jesper Enander; Erik Andersson; Brjánn Ljótsson; Volen Z Ivanov; David Mataix-Cols; Christian Rück Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2020-05-19 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Kristina Aspvall; Fabian Lenhard; Karin Melin; Georgina Krebs; Lisa Norlin; Kristina Näsström; Amita Jassi; Cynthia Turner; Elizabeth Knoetze; Eva Serlachius; Erik Andersson; David Mataix-Cols Journal: Internet Interv Date: 2020-01-27