Literature DB >> 25988303

Factors predicting 30-day readmission after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery within an enhanced recovery programme.

N K Francis1, J Mason1, E Salib2, L Allanby1, D Messenger1, A S Allison1, N J Smart3, J B Ockrim1.   

Abstract

AIM: Hospital readmission within 30 days of surgery has become a marker of poor quality patient care. This study aimed to investigate factors predictive of 30-day readmission after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery within an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programme.
METHOD: Consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer within an ERAS programme between 2002 and 2009 were included. Data were collected relating to patient demographics, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, ERAS compliance, and operative and postoperative outcomes. A logistic regression model was used to identify factors associated with readmissions after adjusting for the potential effect of covariables simultaneously.
RESULTS: In all, 268 cancer patients underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery (108 rectal resections), of whom 34 (12.7%) were readmitted due most commonly to bowel obstruction (29%) and surgical site infection (18%). The use of neoadjuvant therapy (odds ratio 4.49, 95% CI 1.41-14.35; P = 0.011) and ERAS compliance above 93% (odds ratio 0.38, 95% CI 0.18-0.84; P = 0.016) were independent predictors of readmission.
CONCLUSION: Poor ERAS compliance and preoperative chemoradiotherapy were significant predictors of readmission following laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Further research is required to expand the scope of ERAS beyond hospital discharge. Colorectal Disease
© 2015 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopy; colorectal; enhanced recovery; prediction; readmission

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25988303     DOI: 10.1111/codi.13002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  11 in total

1.  Clinical practice guideline for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES).

Authors:  Joseph C Carmichael; Deborah S Keller; Gabriele Baldini; Liliana Bordeianou; Eric Weiss; Lawrence Lee; Marylise Boutros; James McClane; Scott R Steele; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Port site infection in laparoscopic surgery: A review of its management.

Authors:  Prakash K Sasmal; Tushar S Mishra; Satyajit Rath; Susanta Meher; Dipti Mohapatra
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 1.337

3.  Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway vs traditional care in laparoscopic rectal resection: a single-center experience.

Authors:  A Vignali; U Elmore; A Cossu; M Lemma; B Calì; P de Nardi; R Rosati
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Emergency Room Visits and Readmissions Following Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (iERAS) Program.

Authors:  Trevor Wood; Mary-Anne Aarts; Allan Okrainec; Emily Pearsall; J Charles Victor; Marg McKenzie; Ori Rotstein; Robin S McLeod
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Newly implemented enhanced recovery pathway positively impacts hospital length of stay.

Authors:  Thomas D Martin; Talya Lorenz; Jane Ferraro; Kevin Chagin; Richard M Lampman; Karen L Emery; Joan E Zurkan; Jami L Boyd; Karin Montgomery; Rachel E Lang; James F Vandewarker; Robert K Cleary
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Impact of adherence to care pathway interventions on recovery following bowel resection within an established enhanced recovery program.

Authors:  Nicolò Pecorelli; Olivia Hershorn; Gabriele Baldini; Julio F Fiore; Barry L Stein; A Sender Liberman; Patrick Charlebois; Franco Carli; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Reducing Readmissions While Shortening Length of Stay: The Positive Impact of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol in Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Puja M Shah; Lily Johnston; Bethany Sarosiek; Amy Harrigan; Charles M Friel; Robert H Thiele; Traci L Hedrick
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  A real-time electronic symptom monitoring system for patients after discharge following surgery: a pilot study in cancer-related surgery.

Authors:  H S Richards; J M Blazeby; A Portal; R Harding; T Reed; T Lander; K A Chalmers; R Carter; R Singhal; K Absolom; G Velikova; K N L Avery
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Nursing of Gastrointestinal Peristalsis Function Recovery after Abdominal Mirror Surgery for Rectal Cancer Patients Based on Intelligent Electronic Medicine.

Authors:  Yanyan Ding; Sujuan Zhu; Jieqiong Pang; Zhitao Li; Congkun Ming; Xiaofang Song
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 2.682

10.  Electronic collection of patient-reported outcomes following discharge after surgery: systematic review.

Authors:  C Tsang; K S Lee; H Richards; J M Blazeby; K N L Avery
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2021-03-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.