| Literature DB >> 33976755 |
Yanyan Ding1, Sujuan Zhu1, Jieqiong Pang1, Zhitao Li1, Congkun Ming2, Xiaofang Song3.
Abstract
In recent years, with the rapid development of colorectal surgery technology and laparoscopic instruments, laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer has been widely used. Although laparoscopic surgery has the characteristics of small trauma, less blood loss, less hospitalization days, and low incidence of adverse reactions such as incision infection, it is still inevitable to have different degrees of gastrointestinal dysfunction after surgery. This paper mainly studies the recovery nursing of gastrointestinal peristalsis after abdominal mirror in rectal cancer patients based on intelligent electronic medicine. In this paper, an intelligent medical monitoring system is designed for the posterior care of rectal cancer patients with abdominal mirror image, which can realize the collection and transmission of wireless sign parameters of postoperative rectal cancer patients and improve the efficiency of postoperative monitoring in medical work. All parameter data are sent to the Lora base station in real time via Lora wireless communication, which is then uploaded to the medical monitoring platform. The experimental results showed that the first postoperative exhaust time of the treatment group using the intelligent medical monitoring system was significantly shortened, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The first defecation time was shortened, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The recovery time of total fluid diet was shortened, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The above results indicate that the intelligent medical monitoring device designed in this paper has positive significance for improving the work efficiency of the hospital, the clinical experience of patients after abdominal mirror surgery for rectal cancer, and the real-time monitoring of signs of patients in intensive care.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33976755 PMCID: PMC8087471 DOI: 10.1155/2021/6668885
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Figure 1General block diagram of intelligent monitoring system.
Basic information of patients.
| Group | Sex ratio (male : female) |
| Age | Weight | Defecation (day) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group 1 | 17 : 13 | 30 | 61.8 ± 6.37 | 57.19 ± 7.24 | 2.14 ± 1.58 |
| Control group 2 | 16 : 14 | 30 | 60.9 ± 6.25 | 59.36 ± 7.15 | 2.19 ± 1.38 |
| Treatment group | 16 : 14 | 30 | 60.4 ± 6.52 | 56.27 ± 7.06 | 2.27 ± 0.94 |
The first exhaust time after operation in three groups.
| Group | Minimum | Median 1 | Median 2 | Median 3 | Median 4 | Maximum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment group | 18.97 | 20.07 | 20.12 | 20.34 | 20.41 | 21.34 |
| Control group 1 | 20.38 | 21.97 | 22.08 | 22.19 | 22.31 | 23.95 |
| Control group 2 | 24.12 | 25.43 | 25.57 | 25.68 | 25.71 | 26.97 |
Figure 2The first exhaust time after operation in two groups.
Comparison of the first defecation time among the three groups.
| Group | Minimum | Median 1 | Median 2 | Median 3 | Median 4 | Maximum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment group | 24.83 | 26.47 | 26.62 | 26.83 | 26.95 | 28.79 |
| Control group 1 | 27.21 | 28.41 | 28.49 | 28.64 | 28.81 | 30.40 |
| Control group 2 | 29.53 | 31.07 | 31.05 | 31.38 | 31.53 | 33.06 |
Figure 3Comparison of the first defecation time among the three groups.
The recovery time of full fluid diet in three groups after operation.
| Group | Minimum | Median 1 | Median 2 | Median 3 | Median 4 | Maximum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment group | 26.34 | 27.94 | 28.06 | 28.23 | 28.35 | 29.92 |
| Control group 1 | 27.33 | 28.94 | 29.01 | 29.10 | 29.27 | 30.81 |
| Control group 2 | 31.68 | 34.07 | 34.14 | 34.29 | 34.46 | 37.12 |
Figure 4The recovery time of full fluid diet in three groups after operation.
The NRS score of the three groups was 7 days after operation.
| Group | First day | Third day | Fifth day | Seventh day |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment group | 4.62 | 3.46 | 2.74 | 1.47 |
| Control group 1 | 5.14 | 3.90 | 3.06 | 1.84 |
| Control group 2 | 5.91 | 4.63 | 3.57 | 2.27 |
Figure 5The NRS score of the three groups was 7 days after operation.
Comparison of postoperative gastrointestinal adverse reactions.
| Group | Nausea | Vomiting | Abdominal distention |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment group | 4 | 3 | 5 |
| Control group 1 | 8 | 6 | 6 |
| Control group 2 | 13 | 11 | 10 |
Figure 6Comparison of postoperative gastrointestinal adverse reactions.
Figure 7Comparison of postoperative gastrointestinal function scores.