Literature DB >> 28916971

Emergency Room Visits and Readmissions Following Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (iERAS) Program.

Trevor Wood1, Mary-Anne Aarts1,2, Allan Okrainec1,3, Emily Pearsall1, J Charles Victor4, Marg McKenzie5, Ori Rotstein1,6, Robin S McLeod7,8,9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines have been widely promoted and supported largely due to several studies showing decreased post-operative complications and length of stay. The objective of this study was to review the emergency room (ER) visits and readmission rates and reasons for both in patients who were part of the Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (iERAS) program for colorectal surgery.
METHODS: All patients having elective colorectal surgery at 15 academic hospitals were enrolled in the iERAS program. All patients were prospectively followed until 30 days post-discharge. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and multivariable analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 2876 patients (48% female; mean 60 years old) were enrolled. Cancer was the most frequent indication (68.2%) for surgery. Overall, the median length of stay (LOS) was 5 days. Post-discharge, 359 (11.6%) of patients had a visit to the ER not requiring admission. The most common reasons for visiting the ER were surgical site infections (SSI) (34.5%), other wound complications (10.0%), and urinary tract infections (UTI) (8.6%). In addition, a smaller proportion of patients, 260 (8.2%) required readmission. The most common reasons for readmission were ileus and nausea/vomiting (26.1%), intra-abdominal abscess (23.9%), and SSI (11.5%). Patient and disease factors associated with ER visits, on multivariable analysis, included extremes of BMI (RR 1.02, 95%CI 1.01-1.04, p = 0.002), rectal surgery versus colon surgery (RR 1.34, 95%CI 1.14-1.58, p < 0.001), and open operative approach (RR 1.63, 95%CI 1.28-2.09, p < 0.001). Independent factors associated with hospital readmissions included rectal surgery (RR 1.89, 95%CI 1.34-2.77, p < 0.001), formation of a stoma (RR 1.34, 95%CI 1.04-1.74, p = 0.026), and reoperation during first admission (RR 4.60, 95%CI 3.50-6.05, p < 0.001). Length of stay of 5 days or less was not associated with ER visits or readmission (RR 0.99, 95%CI 0.72-1.35 and RR 0.91, 95%CI 0.71-1.18, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Following colorectal surgery using an ERAS pathway, shortened length of stay is not associated with an increased return to the ER or hospital readmission. The majority of return visits to the hospital are ER visits not requiring readmission and the predominant reason for return are surgical site infections and wound complications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Emergency visits; Enhanced recovery; Implementation; Outcomes; Readmissions

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28916971     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-017-3555-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  16 in total

1.  The impact of postdischarge telephonic follow-up on hospital readmissions.

Authors:  Patricia L Harrison; Pamela A Hara; James E Pope; Michelle C Young; Elizabeth Y Rula
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 2.459

Review 2.  Health care-associated infections: a meta-analysis of costs and financial impact on the US health care system.

Authors:  Eyal Zimlichman; Daniel Henderson; Orly Tamir; Calvin Franz; Peter Song; Cyrus K Yamin; Carol Keohane; Charles R Denham; David W Bates
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013 Dec 9-23       Impact factor: 21.873

3.  Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program attenuates stress and accelerates recovery in patients after radical resection for colorectal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Li Ren; Dexiang Zhu; Ye Wei; Xiangou Pan; Li Liang; Jianmin Xu; Yunshi Zhong; Zhanggang Xue; Ling Jin; Shaokang Zhan; Weixin Niu; Xinyu Qin; Zhaohan Wu; Zhaoguang Wu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Factors predicting 30-day readmission after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery within an enhanced recovery programme.

Authors:  N K Francis; J Mason; E Salib; L Allanby; D Messenger; A S Allison; N J Smart; J B Ockrim
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.788

5.  Impact of obesity on the risk of wound infection following surgery: results from a nationwide prospective multicentre cohort study in England.

Authors:  S Thelwall; P Harrington; E Sheridan; T Lamagni
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2015-07-18       Impact factor: 8.067

Review 6.  Patient education has a positive effect in patients with a stoma: a systematic review.

Authors:  A K Danielsen; J Burcharth; J Rosenberg
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.788

7.  Risk of readmission after laparoscopic vs. open colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Iyare O Esemuede; Alodia Gabre-Kidan; Dennis L Fowler; Ravi P Kiran
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Ileostomy pathway virtually eliminates readmissions for dehydration in new ostomates.

Authors:  Deborah Nagle; Therese Pare; Emily Keenan; Kristin Marcet; Steven Tizio; Vitaliy Poylin
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Patient perspectives on post-discharge surgical site infections: towards a patient-centered mobile health solution.

Authors:  Patrick C Sanger; Andrea Hartzler; Sarah M Han; Cheryl A L Armstrong; Mark R Stewart; Ross J Lordon; William B Lober; Heather L Evans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of enhanced recovery programmes in surgical patients.

Authors:  A Nicholson; M C Lowe; J Parker; S R Lewis; P Alderson; A F Smith
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  7 in total

1.  Risk-stratified clinical pathways decrease the duration of hospitalization and costs of perioperative care after pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Jason W Denbo; Morgan Bruno; Whitney Dewhurst; Michael P Kim; Ching-Wei Tzeng; Thomas A Aloia; Jose Soliz; Barbara Bryce Speer; Jeffrey E Lee; Matthew H G Katz
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  30-Day unanticipated healthcare encounters after prolapse surgery: impact of same day discharge.

Authors:  Anna L Romanova; Charelle Carter-Brooks; Kristine M Ruppert; Halina M Zyczynski
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Trends in emergency department utilization following common operations in New York State, 2005-2014.

Authors:  Craig S Brown; Jie Yang; Ziqi Meng; James Henderson; Justin B Dimick; Dana A Telem
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  An enhanced recovery program in colorectal surgery is associated with decreased organ level rates of complications: a difference-in-differences analysis.

Authors:  Alexander T Hawkins; Timothy M Geiger; Adam B King; Jonathan P Wanderer; Vikram Tiwari; Roberta L Muldoon; Molly M Ford; Roger R Dmochowski; Warren S Sandberg; Barbara Martin; M Benjamin Hopkins; Matthew D McEvoy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  ACERTO PROJECT: IMPACT ON ASSISTANCE OF A PUBLIC EMERGENCY HOSPITAL.

Authors:  Mauricio Adam Feitosa Sampaio; Simone Losekann Pereira Sampaio; Plinio da Cunha Leal; Ed Carlos Rey Moura; Lívia Goreth Galvão Serejo Alvares; Caio Marcio Barros DE-Oliveira; Orlando Jorge Martins Torres; Marília da Glória Martins
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2021-01-15

6.  Early Follow-up After Colorectal Surgery Reduces Postdischarge Emergency Department Visits.

Authors:  Stephanie T Lumpkin; Paula D Strassle; Jason P Fine; Timothy S Carey; Karyn B Stitzenberg
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 4.412

7.  Cost-benefit analysis of enhanced recovery after hepatectomy in Chinese Han population.

Authors:  Xiaolin Jing; Bingyuan Zhang; Shichao Xing; Liqi Tian; Xiufang Wang; Meng Zhou; Jiangfeng Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.817

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.