Bin Lu1, Meng Li1, Yue Hu1, Yi Xu1, Shuo Zhang1, Li-Jun Cai1. 1. Bin Lu, Meng Li, Yue Hu, Yi Xu, Shuo Zhang, Li-Jun Cai, Department of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310006, Zhejiang Province, China.
Abstract
AIM: To assess the safety and feasibility of peroral esophageal myotomy (POEM) in patients with achalasia. METHODS: From January 2012 to March 2014, 50 patients (28 men, 22 women; mean age: 42.8 years, range: 14-70 years) underwent POEM. Pre- and postoperative symptoms were quantified using the Eckardt scoring system. Barium swallow and esophagogastroscopy were performed before and after POEM, respectively. Esophageal motility was evaluated in all patients, both preoperatively and one month after POEM treatment, using a high-resolution manometry system. Manometry data, Eckardt scores, lower esophageal sphincter pressure and barium swallow results were used to evaluate the effect of the procedure. RESULTS: POEM was successfully completed for all patients. The mean procedure time was 55.4 ± 17.3 min and the mean total length of myotomy of the circular esophagus was 10.5 ± 2.6 cm. No specific complications occurred, with the exception of two patients that developed asymptomatic pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema. Clinical improvement in symptoms was achieved in all patients. Approximately 77.5% of patients experienced weight gain 6 mo after POEM, with an average of 4.78 kg (range: 2-15 kg). The lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure, four second integrated relaxation pressure and Eckardt scores were all significantly reduced after POEM (Ps < 0.05). A small segment of proximal esophageal peristalsis appeared postoperatively in two patients, but without normal esophageal peristalsis. The average diameter of the esophageal lumen decreased significantly from 4.39 to 3.09 cm (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: POEM can relieve achalasia symptoms, improve gastroesophageal junction relaxation and restore esophageal body motility function, but not normal esophageal peristalsis.
AIM: To assess the safety and feasibility of peroral esophageal myotomy (POEM) in patients with achalasia. METHODS: From January 2012 to March 2014, 50 patients (28 men, 22 women; mean age: 42.8 years, range: 14-70 years) underwent POEM. Pre- and postoperative symptoms were quantified using the Eckardt scoring system. Barium swallow and esophagogastroscopy were performed before and after POEM, respectively. Esophageal motility was evaluated in all patients, both preoperatively and one month after POEM treatment, using a high-resolution manometry system. Manometry data, Eckardt scores, lower esophageal sphincter pressure and barium swallow results were used to evaluate the effect of the procedure. RESULTS: POEM was successfully completed for all patients. The mean procedure time was 55.4 ± 17.3 min and the mean total length of myotomy of the circular esophagus was 10.5 ± 2.6 cm. No specific complications occurred, with the exception of two patients that developed asymptomatic pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema. Clinical improvement in symptoms was achieved in all patients. Approximately 77.5% of patients experienced weight gain 6 mo after POEM, with an average of 4.78 kg (range: 2-15 kg). The lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure, four second integrated relaxation pressure and Eckardt scores were all significantly reduced after POEM (Ps < 0.05). A small segment of proximal esophageal peristalsis appeared postoperatively in two patients, but without normal esophageal peristalsis. The average diameter of the esophageal lumen decreased significantly from 4.39 to 3.09 cm (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: POEM can relieve achalasia symptoms, improve gastroesophageal junction relaxation and restore esophageal body motility function, but not normal esophageal peristalsis.
Authors: H Inoue; H Minami; Y Kobayashi; Y Sato; M Kaga; M Suzuki; H Satodate; N Odaka; H Itoh; S Kudo Journal: Endoscopy Date: 2010-03-30 Impact factor: 10.093
Authors: Daniel Von Renteln; Karl-Hermann Fuchs; Paul Fockens; Peter Bauerfeind; Melina C Vassiliou; Yuki B Werner; Gerald Fried; Wolfram Breithaupt; Henriette Heinrich; Albert J Bredenoord; Jan F Kersten; Tessa Verlaan; Michael Trevisonno; Thomas Rösch Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2013-05-09 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: A J Bredenoord; M Fox; P J Kahrilas; J E Pandolfino; W Schwizer; A J P M Smout Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 3.598
Authors: P H Zhou; Q L Li; L Q Yao; M D Xu; W F Chen; M Y Cai; J W Hu; L Li; Y Q Zhang; Y S Zhong; L L Ma; W Z Qin; Z Cui Journal: Endoscopy Date: 2013-02-06 Impact factor: 10.093
Authors: Lee L Swanstrom; Ashwin Kurian; Christy M Dunst; Ahmed Sharata; Neil Bhayani; Erwin Rieder Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Madhusudhan R Sanaka; Umar Hayat; Prashanthi N Thota; Ramprasad Jegadeesan; Monica Ray; Scott L Gabbard; Neha Wadhwa; Rocio Lopez; Mark E Baker; Sudish Murthy; Siva Raja Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2016-05-28 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Lena Shally; Kashif Saeed; Derek Berglund; Mark Dudash; Katie Frank; Vladan N Obradovic; Anthony T Petrick; David L Diehl; Jon D Gabrielsen; David M Parker Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2022-10-11 Impact factor: 3.453
Authors: Zuzana Vackova; Jan Mares; Jana Krajciova; Zuzana Rabekova; Lucie Zdrhova; Pavla Loudova; Julius Spicak; Petr Stirand; Tomas Hucl; Jan Martinek Journal: J Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2021-04-30 Impact factor: 4.924
Authors: Hong Jin Yoon; Jeung Eun Lee; Da Hyun Jung; Jun Chul Park; Young Hoon Youn; Hyojin Park Journal: J Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2020-01-30 Impact factor: 4.924