Literature DB >> 23382636

New endoscopic classification of achalasia for selection of candidates for peroral endoscopic myotomy.

Hui-Kai Li1, En-Qiang Linghu.   

Abstract

AIM: To propose a new endoscopic classification of achalasia for selecting patients appropriate for undergoing peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM).
METHODS: We screened out the data of patients with achalasia examined from October 2000 to September 2011 at our Digestive Endoscopic Center with endoscopic pictures clear enough to reveal the morphology of middle and lower esophagus. After analyzing the correlation between the endoscopic morphology of the esophageal lumen and POEM, we proposed a new endoscopic classification (Ling classification) of achalasia according to three kinds of endoscopically viewed structures: multi-ring structure, crescent-like structure and diverticulum structure. There were three types based on the criteria of Ling classification: type I, smooth without multi-ring, crescent-like structure or diverticulum structure; type II, with multi-ring or crescent-like structure but without diverticulum structure; and type III, with diverticulum structure. Type II was classified into three subtypes: Ling II(a), Ling II(b) and Ling II(c); and type III also had three subtypes: Ling III(l), Ling III(r) and Ling III(lr). Two endoscopists made a final decision upon mutual agreement through discussion if their separately recorded characteristics were different.
RESULTS: Among the 976 screened patients with achalasia, 636 patients with qualified endoscopic pictures were selected for the analysis, including 405 males and 231 females. The average age was 42.7 years, ranging from 6 to 93 years. Type I was the most commonly observed type of achalasia, accounting for 64.5% (410/636), and type III was the least commonly observed type of achalasia, accounting for 2.8% (18/636). And type II accounted for 32.7% (208/636) and subtype of Ling II(a), Ling II(b) and Ling II(c) accounted for 14.6% (93/636), 9.9% (63/636) and 8.2% (52/636), respectively. And subtype of Ling III(l), Ling III(r) and Ling III(lr) accounted for 0.8% (5/636), 0.3% (2/636) and 1.7% (11/636), respectively.
CONCLUSION: A new endoscopic classification of achalasia is proposed that might help in determining the proper candidates for POEM.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Achalasia; Classification; Endoscopy; Peroral endoscopic myotomy; Selection

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23382636      PMCID: PMC3558581          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i4.556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  24 in total

Review 1.  Modern management of achalasia.

Authors:  Fouad J Moawad; Roy Kh Wong
Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.287

2.  Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia.

Authors:  H Inoue; H Minami; Y Kobayashi; Y Sato; M Kaga; M Suzuki; H Satodate; N Odaka; H Itoh; S Kudo
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 10.093

3.  Pneumatic dilation versus laparoscopic Heller's myotomy for idiopathic achalasia.

Authors:  Guy E Boeckxstaens; Vito Annese; Stanislas Bruley des Varannes; Stanislas Chaussade; Mario Costantini; Antonello Cuttitta; J Ignasi Elizalde; Uberto Fumagalli; Marianne Gaudric; Wout O Rohof; André J Smout; Jan Tack; Aeilko H Zwinderman; Giovanni Zaninotto; Olivier R Busch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Endoscopic pneumatic dilation versus botulinum toxin injection in the management of primary achalasia.

Authors:  J E Leyden; A C Moss; P MacMathuna
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

5.  Endoscopic myotomy in the treatment of achalasia.

Authors:  J A Ortega; V Madureri; L Perez
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 6.  Current approach to the treatment of achalasia.

Authors:  Joseph G Cheatham; Roy K H Wong
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2011-06

7.  Botox, dilation, or myotomy? Clinical outcome of interventional and surgical therapies for achalasia.

Authors:  Christian Alexander Gutschow; Ulrich Töx; Jessica Leers; Hartmut Schäfer; Klaus Ludwig Prenzel; Arnulf H Hölscher
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  A stepwise approach and early clinical experience in peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia and esophageal motility disorders.

Authors:  Lee L Swanström; Erwin Rieder; Christy M Dunst
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 9.  Meta-analysis of randomized and controlled treatment trials for achalasia.

Authors:  Lan Wang; You-Ming Li; Lan Li
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Achalasia: a new clinically relevant classification by high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; Monika A Kwiatek; Thomas Nealis; William Bulsiewicz; Jennifer Post; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  11 in total

1.  Treatment of esophageal motility disorders based on the chicago classification.

Authors:  Carla Maradey-Romero; Scott Gabbard; Ronnie Fass
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12

Review 2.  Peroral endoscopic myotomy: Time to change our opinion regarding the treatment of achalasia?

Authors:  Marcel Tantau; Dana Crisan
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-03-16

3.  Safety and efficacy of using a short tunnel versus a standard tunnel for peroral endoscopic myotomy for Ling type IIc and III achalasia: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Longsong Li; Ningli Chai; Enqiang Linghu; Zhenjuan Li; Chen Du; Wengang Zhang; Jiale Zou; Ying Xiong; Xiaobin Zhang; Ping Tang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Type III Achalasia of Chicago Classification: Outcomes with a Minimum Follow-Up of 24 Months.

Authors:  Wengang Zhang; En-Qiang Linghu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Effect of peroral esophageal myotomy for achalasia treatment: A Chinese study.

Authors:  Bin Lu; Meng Li; Yue Hu; Yi Xu; Shuo Zhang; Li-Jun Cai
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Comparison of fully coated anti-reflux metal stenting and per-oral endoscopic myotomy in patients with achalasia: a propensity score-matched retrospective study.

Authors:  Yu-Fen Tang; Peng Jin; Yu-Rong Tao; Hui Xie; Xin Wang; Dongliang Yu; Shan Tang; Jian-Qiu Sheng
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 2.847

7.  Ling classification applied in the preoperative safety and effectiveness assessment of POEM.

Authors:  Ningli Chai; Xiaobin Zhang; Ying Xiong; Hui Ding; Jia Feng; Yingying Li; Shuangzhe Yao; Xiaotong Niu; Enqiang Linghu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Peroral endoscopic myotomy can improve esophageal motility in patients with achalasia from a large sample self-control research (66 patients).

Authors:  Shuangzhe Yao; Enqiang Linghu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Ling classification describes endoscopic progressive process of achalasia and successful peroral endoscopy myotomy prevents endoscopic progression of achalasia.

Authors:  Wen-Gang Zhang; En-Qiang Linghu; Ning-Li Chai; Hui-Kai Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-05-14       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  New endoscopic classification of esophageal mucosa in achalasia: A predictor for submucosal fibrosis.

Authors:  Xiuxue Feng; Enqiang Linghu; Ningli Chai; Hui Ding
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.485

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.