Tiago A Magalhães1, Satoru Kishi2, Richard T George2, Armin Arbab-Zadeh2, Andrea L Vavere2, Christopher Cox3, Matthew B Matheson3, Julie M Miller2, Jeffrey Brinker2, Marcelo Di Carli4, Frank J Rybicki4, Carlos E Rochitte5, Melvin E Clouse6, João A C Lima7. 1. Department of Cardiology, Cardiology Division, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Blalock 524D1, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; Department of Cardiology, Heart Institute (InCor), University of São Paulo Medical School, Brazil; Department of Radiology, Division of Cardiovascular CT/MR, Heart Hospital (HCOR), São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil. 2. Department of Cardiology, Cardiology Division, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Blalock 524D1, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. 3. Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. 4. Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 5. Department of Cardiology, Heart Institute (InCor), University of São Paulo Medical School, Brazil; Department of Radiology, Division of Cardiovascular CT/MR, Heart Hospital (HCOR), São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil. 6. Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA. 7. Department of Cardiology, Cardiology Division, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Blalock 524D1, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. Electronic address: jlima@jhmi.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The combination of coronary CT angiography (CTA) and myocardial CT perfusion (CTP) is gaining increasing acceptance, but a standardized approach to be implemented in the clinical setting is necessary. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the accuracy of a combined coronary CTA and myocardial CTP comprehensive protocol compared to coronary CTA alone, using a combination of invasive coronary angiography and single photon emission CT as reference. METHODS: Three hundred eighty-one patients included in the CORE320 trial were analyzed in this study. Flow-limiting stenosis was defined as the presence of ≥50% stenosis by invasive coronary angiography with a related perfusion defect by single photon emission CT. The combined CTA + CTP definition of disease was the presence of a ≥50% stenosis with a related perfusion defect. All data sets were analyzed by 2 experienced readers, aligning anatomic findings by CTA with perfusion defects by CTP. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 62 ± 6 years (66% male), 27% with prior history of myocardial infarction. In a per-patient analysis, sensitivity for CTA alone was 93%, specificity was 54%, positive predictive value was 55%, negative predictive value was 93%, and overall accuracy was 69%. After combining CTA and CTP, sensitivity was 78%, specificity was 73%, negative predictive value was 64%, positive predictive value was 0.85%, and overall accuracy was 75%. In a per-vessel analysis, overall accuracy of CTA alone was 73% compared to 79% for the combination of CTA and CTP (P < .0001 for difference). CONCLUSIONS: Combining coronary CTA and myocardial CTP findings through a comprehensive protocol is feasible. Although sensitivity is lower, specificity and overall accuracy are higher than assessment by coronary CTA when compared against a reference standard of stenosis with an associated perfusion defect.
BACKGROUND: The combination of coronary CT angiography (CTA) and myocardial CT perfusion (CTP) is gaining increasing acceptance, but a standardized approach to be implemented in the clinical setting is necessary. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the accuracy of a combined coronary CTA and myocardial CTP comprehensive protocol compared to coronary CTA alone, using a combination of invasive coronary angiography and single photon emission CT as reference. METHODS: Three hundred eighty-one patients included in the CORE320 trial were analyzed in this study. Flow-limiting stenosis was defined as the presence of ≥50% stenosis by invasive coronary angiography with a related perfusion defect by single photon emission CT. The combined CTA + CTP definition of disease was the presence of a ≥50% stenosis with a related perfusion defect. All data sets were analyzed by 2 experienced readers, aligning anatomic findings by CTA with perfusion defects by CTP. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 62 ± 6 years (66% male), 27% with prior history of myocardial infarction. In a per-patient analysis, sensitivity for CTA alone was 93%, specificity was 54%, positive predictive value was 55%, negative predictive value was 93%, and overall accuracy was 69%. After combining CTA and CTP, sensitivity was 78%, specificity was 73%, negative predictive value was 64%, positive predictive value was 0.85%, and overall accuracy was 75%. In a per-vessel analysis, overall accuracy of CTA alone was 73% compared to 79% for the combination of CTA and CTP (P < .0001 for difference). CONCLUSIONS: Combining coronary CTA and myocardial CTP findings through a comprehensive protocol is feasible. Although sensitivity is lower, specificity and overall accuracy are higher than assessment by coronary CTA when compared against a reference standard of stenosis with an associated perfusion defect.
Authors: Joanne D Schuijf; William Wijns; J Wouter Jukema; Douwe E Atsma; Albert de Roos; Hildo J Lamb; Marcel P M Stokkel; Petra Dibbets-Schneider; Isabel Decramer; Pieter De Bondt; Ernst E van der Wall; Piet K Vanhoenacker; Jeroen J Bax Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2006-11-28 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Jacob M van Werkhoven; Joanne D Schuijf; Oliver Gaemperli; J Wouter Jukema; Eric Boersma; William Wijns; Paul Stolzmann; Hatem Alkadhi; Ines Valenta; Marcel P M Stokkel; Lucia J Kroft; Albert de Roos; Gabija Pundziute; Arthur Scholte; Ernst E van der Wall; Philipp A Kaufmann; Jeroen J Bax Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-02-17 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Carlos E Rochitte; Richard T George; Marcus Y Chen; Armin Arbab-Zadeh; Marc Dewey; Julie M Miller; Hiroyuki Niinuma; Kunihiro Yoshioka; Kakuya Kitagawa; Shiro Nakamori; Roger Laham; Andrea L Vavere; Rodrigo J Cerci; Vishal C Mehra; Cesar Nomura; Klaus F Kofoed; Masahiro Jinzaki; Sachio Kuribayashi; Albert de Roos; Michael Laule; Swee Yaw Tan; John Hoe; Narinder Paul; Frank J Rybicki; Jeffery A Brinker; Andrew E Arai; Christopher Cox; Melvin E Clouse; Marcelo F Di Carli; Joao A C Lima Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2013-11-19 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: W Bob Meijboom; Carlos A G Van Mieghem; Niels van Pelt; Annick Weustink; Francesca Pugliese; Nico R Mollet; Eric Boersma; Eveline Regar; Robert J van Geuns; Peter J de Jaegere; Patrick W Serruys; Gabriel P Krestin; Pim J de Feyter Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2008-08-19 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: W Bob Meijboom; Matthijs F L Meijs; Joanne D Schuijf; Maarten J Cramer; Nico R Mollet; Carlos A G van Mieghem; Koen Nieman; Jacob M van Werkhoven; Gabija Pundziute; Annick C Weustink; Alexander M de Vos; Francesca Pugliese; Benno Rensing; J Wouter Jukema; Jeroen J Bax; Mathias Prokop; Pieter A Doevendans; Myriam G M Hunink; Gabriel P Krestin; Pim J de Feyter Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2008-12-16 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Julie M Miller; Carlos E Rochitte; Marc Dewey; Armin Arbab-Zadeh; Hiroyuki Niinuma; Ilan Gottlieb; Narinder Paul; Melvin E Clouse; Edward P Shapiro; John Hoe; Albert C Lardo; David E Bush; Albert de Roos; Christopher Cox; Jeffery Brinker; João A C Lima Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-11-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Leslee J Shaw; Daniel S Berman; David J Maron; G B John Mancini; Sean W Hayes; Pamela M Hartigan; William S Weintraub; Robert A O'Rourke; Marcin Dada; John A Spertus; Bernard R Chaitman; John Friedman; Piotr Slomka; Gary V Heller; Guido Germano; Gilbert Gosselin; Peter Berger; William J Kostuk; Ronald G Schwartz; Merill Knudtson; Emir Veledar; Eric R Bates; Benjamin McCallister; Koon K Teo; William E Boden Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-02-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Matthew J Budoff; David Dowe; James G Jollis; Michael Gitter; John Sutherland; Edward Halamert; Markus Scherer; Raye Bellinger; Arthur Martin; Robert Benton; Augustin Delago; James K Min Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2008-11-18 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Bhavna Balaney; Mani Vembar; Michael Grass; Amita Singh; Keigo Kawaji; Luis Landeras; Jonathan Chung; Victor Mor-Avi; Amit R Patel Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2019-03-02 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Kelley R Branch; Ryan D Haley; Marcio Sommer Bittencourt; Amit R Patel; Edward Hulten; Ron Blankstein Journal: Cardiovasc Diagn Ther Date: 2017-10
Authors: Bryan C Ramsey; Amy E Field; Dustin M Thomas; Christopher A Pickett; Alisa J Leon; Bernard J Rubal Journal: Comp Med Date: 2020-04-30 Impact factor: 0.982
Authors: Filippo Cademartiri; Sara Seitun; Alberto Clemente; Ludovico La Grutta; Patrizia Toia; Giuseppe Runza; Massimo Midiri; Erica Maffei Journal: Cardiovasc Diagn Ther Date: 2017-04
Authors: Jorge A Gonzalez; Michael J Lipinski; Lucia Flors; Peter W Shaw; Christopher M Kramer; Michael Salerno Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2015-08-14 Impact factor: 2.778