Literature DB >> 25972399

Superior abstract-concept learning by Clark's nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana).

John F Magnotti1, Jeffrey S Katz2, Anthony A Wright3, Debbie M Kelly4.   

Abstract

The ability to learn abstract relational concepts is fundamental to higher level cognition. In contrast to item-specific concepts (e.g. pictures containing trees versus pictures containing cars), abstract relational concepts are not bound to particular stimulus features, but instead involve the relationship between stimuli and therefore may be extrapolated to novel stimuli. Previous research investigating the same/different abstract concept has suggested that primates might be specially adapted to extract relations among items and would require fewer exemplars of a rule to learn an abstract concept than non-primate species. We assessed abstract-concept learning in an avian species, Clark's nutcracker (Nucifraga columbiana), using a small number of exemplars (eight pairs of the same rule, and 56 pairs of the different rule) identical to that previously used to compare rhesus monkeys, capuchin monkeys and pigeons. Nutcrackers as a group (N = 9) showed more novel stimulus transfer than any previous species tested with this small number of exemplars. Two nutcrackers showed full concept learning and four more showed transfer considerably above chance performance, indicating partial concept learning. These results show that the Clark's nutcracker, a corvid species well known for its amazing feats of spatial memory, learns the same/different abstract concept better than any non-human species (including non-human primates) yet tested on this same task.
© 2015 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clark's nutcracker; concept learning; novel transfer; rule learning; same/different learning

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25972399      PMCID: PMC4455740          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  14 in total

1.  Generalized relational matching by guinea baboons (Papio papio) in two-by-two-item analogy problems.

Authors:  Joël Fagot; Roger K R Thompson
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-09-20

2.  Schema induction in problem solving: a multidimensional analysis.

Authors:  Zhe Chen; Lei Mo
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Spontaneous transfer of matching by infant chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Authors:  D L Oden; R K Thompson; D Premack
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1988-04

4.  Mechanisms of same/different concept learning in primates and avians.

Authors:  Anthony A Wright; Jeffrey S Katz
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2006-03-12       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  Same/different abstract-concept learning by pigeons.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Katz; Anthony A Wright
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2006-01

6.  Learning and transfer of relational matching-to-sample by pigeons.

Authors:  Robert G Cook; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-12

7.  Issues in the Comparative Cognition of Abstract-Concept Learning.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Katz; Anthony A Wright; Kent D Bodily
Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev       Date:  2007-01-01

Review 8.  How to grow a mind: statistics, structure, and abstraction.

Authors:  Joshua B Tenenbaum; Charles Kemp; Thomas L Griffiths; Noah D Goodman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Performance of four seed-caching corvid species in operant tests of nonspatial and spatial memory.

Authors:  D J Olson; A C Kamil; R P Balda; P J Nims
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.231

10.  A comparative study of geometric rule learning by nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana), pigeons (Columba livia), and jackdaws (Corvus monedula).

Authors:  Juli E Jones; Elena Antoniadis; Sara J Shettleworth; Alan C Kamil
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.231

View more
  7 in total

1.  Successive odor matching- and non-matching-to-sample in rats: A reversal design.

Authors:  Katherine Bruce; Katherine Dyer; Michael Mathews; Catharine Nealley; Tiffany Phasukkan; Ashley Prichard; Mark Galizio
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 1.777

2.  Same/different concept learning by primates and birds.

Authors:  Anthony A Wright; Debbie M Kelly; Jeffrey S Katz
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Comparative approaches to same/different abstract-concept learning.

Authors:  A A Wright; D M Kelly
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  The oddity preference effect and the concept of difference in pigeons.

Authors:  Thomas A Daniel; Anthony A Wright; Jeffrey S Katz
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Examination of long-term visual memorization capacity in the Clark's nutcracker (Nucifraga columbiana).

Authors:  Muhammad A J Qadri; Kevin Leonard; Robert G Cook; Debbie M Kelly
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

Review 6.  Comparing cognition by integrating concept learning, proactive interference, and list memory.

Authors:  Anthony A Wright; Debbie M Kelly; Jeffrey S Katz
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Abstract-concept learning in Black-billed magpies (Pica hudsonia).

Authors:  John F Magnotti; Anthony A Wright; Kevin Leonard; Jeffrey S Katz; Debbie M Kelly
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.