Literature DB >> 27059232

The oddity preference effect and the concept of difference in pigeons.

Thomas A Daniel1,2, Anthony A Wright3, Jeffrey S Katz4.   

Abstract

Previous work in discrimination learning has shown that nonmatching (oddity) tasks are learned faster and more accurately than comparable matching tasks. This learning advantage has been coined the oddity preference effect (Wright & Delius in Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 31, 425-432. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.31.4.425 , 2005). Pigeons trained in a nonmatching task, following training in a same/different (S/D) task, learned the abstract concept of difference (Daniel et al., in Animal Cognition, 18(4), 831-837, 2015), but they did not show the expected faster acquisition or high levels of transfer from the oddity preference effect. In the present study, experimentally naïve pigeons were trained in an identical nonmatching task to examine whether they would show the oddity preference effect on abstract-concept learning. These experimentally naïve pigeons did show an oddity preference effect; their transfer to novel configurations was above chance with the initial (smallest) set size (3-item set) and was substantially more accurate than novel transfer in similar match-to-sample (MTS) or S/D tasks (Bodily et al., in Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 34, 178-184. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.34.1.178 , 2008; Katz & Wright in Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 32, 80-86. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.32.1.80 , 2006). As the number exemplars in the training set increased, transfer to novel configurations increased and reached equivalence to trained-stimulus performance with a 24-item set. Despite this transfer being equal to baseline performance with a 24-item set, subsequent transfers following training with larger set sizes declined before eventually rising again to baseline performance. This unusual set-size function (with inflection points at the 24- and 96-set sizes) suggests that these pigeons may have combined item-specific and relational learning strategies with differing emphasis as they acquired the abstract concept.

Keywords:  Concept learning; Discrimination; Matching; Nonmatching; Pigeon

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27059232     DOI: 10.3758/s13420-016-0219-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  21 in total

1.  Judgment of conceptual identity in monkeys.

Authors:  D Bovet; J Vauclair
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-09

2.  Some data on matching behavior in the pigeon.

Authors:  W W CUMMING; R BERRYMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Matching in pigeons.

Authors:  N GINSBURG
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1957-06

4.  Mechanisms of same/different concept learning in primates and avians.

Authors:  Anthony A Wright; Jeffrey S Katz
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2006-03-12       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  Same/different abstract-concept learning by pigeons.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Katz; Anthony A Wright
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2006-01

6.  Differential outcomes facilitate same/different concept learning.

Authors:  Kelly A Schmidtke; Jeffrey S Katz; Anthony A Wright
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  Abstract-concept learning of difference in pigeons.

Authors:  Thomas A Daniel; Anthony A Wright; Jeffrey S Katz
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  Acquisition and transfer of simultaneous oddity.

Authors:  R Berryman; W W Cumming; L R Cohen; D F Johnson
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  1965-12

9.  Is face processing species-specific during the first year of life?

Authors:  Olivier Pascalis; Michelle de Haan; Charles A Nelson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-05-17       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  An analysis of short-term visual memory in the monkey.

Authors:  M Mishkin; J Delacour
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1975-10
View more
  1 in total

1.  Paper wasps form abstract concept of 'same and different'.

Authors:  Chloe Weise; Christian Cely Ortiz; Elizabeth A Tibbetts
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 5.530

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.