Literature DB >> 25971841

Evaluation of the influence of cardiac motion on the accuracy and reproducibility of longitudinal measurements and the corresponding image quality in optical frequency domain imaging: an ex vivo investigation of the optimal pullback speed.

Kohei Koyama1, Kihei Yoneyama, Takanobu Mitarai, Shingo Kuwata, Ken Kongoji, Tomoo Harada, Yoshihiro J Akashi.   

Abstract

Longitudinal measurement using intravascular ultrasound is limited because the motorized pullback device assumes no cardiac motion. A newly developed intracoronary imaging modality, optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI), has higher resolution and an increased auto-pullback speed with presumably lesser susceptibility to cardiac motion artifacts during pullback for longitudinal measurement; however, it has not been fully investigated. We aimed to clarify the influence of cardiac motion on the accuracy and reproducibility of longitudinal measurements obtained using OFDI and to determine the optimal pullback speed. This ex vivo study included 31 stents deployed in the mid left anterior descending artery under phantom heartbeat and coronary flow simulation. Longitudinal stent lengths were measured twice using OFDI at three pullback speeds. Differences in stent lengths between OFDI and microscopy and between two repetitive pullbacks were assessed to determine accuracy and reproducibility. Furthermore, three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction was used for evaluating image quality. With regard to differences in stent length between OFDI and microscopy, the intraclass correlation coefficient values were 0.985, 0.994, and 0.995 at 10, 20, and 40 mm/s, respectively. With regard to reproducibility, the values were 0.995, 0.996, and 0.996 at 10, 20, and 40 mm/s, respectively. 3D reconstruction showed a superior image quality at 10 and 20 mm/s compared with that at 40 mm/s. OFDI demonstrated high accuracy and reproducibility for longitudinal stent measurements. Moreover, its accuracy and reproducibility were remarkable at a higher pullback speed. A 20-mm/s pullback speed may be optimal for clinical and research purposes.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25971841     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-015-0676-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  11 in total

Review 1.  American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies (IVUS). A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  G S Mintz; S E Nissen; W D Anderson; S R Bailey; R Erbel; P J Fitzgerald; F J Pinto; K Rosenfield; R J Siegel; E M Tuzcu; P G Yock
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Axial movement of the intravascular ultrasound probe during the cardiac cycle: implications for three-dimensional reconstruction and measurements of coronary dimensions.

Authors:  A Arbab-Zadeh; A N DeMaria; W F Penny; R J Russo; B J Kimura; V Bhargava
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 3.  Clinical expert consensus document on standards for acquisition, measurement and reporting of intravascular ultrasound regression/progression studies.

Authors:  Gary S Mintz; Hector M Garcia-Garcia; Stephen J Nicholls; Neil J Weissman; Nico Bruining; Tim Crowe; Jean-Claude Tardif; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 6.534

4.  Reproducibility of coronary Fourier domain optical coherence tomography: quantitative analysis of in vivo stented coronary arteries using three different software packages.

Authors:  Takayuki Okamura; Nieves Gonzalo; Juan Luis Gutiérrez-Chico; Patrick W Serruys; Nico Bruining; Sebastiaan de Winter; Jouke Dijkstra; Koen H Commossaris; Robert-Jan van Geuns; Gijs van Soest; Jurgen Ligthart; Evelyn Regar
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 6.534

5.  Electrocardiogram-gated intravascular ultrasound image acquisition after coronary stent deployment facilitates on-line three-dimensional reconstruction and automated lumen quantification.

Authors:  C von Birgelen; G S Mintz; A Nicosia; D P Foley; W J van der Giessen; N Bruining; S G Airiian; J R Roelandt; P J de Feyter; P W Serruys
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  ECG-gated three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound: feasibility and reproducibility of the automated analysis of coronary lumen and atherosclerotic plaque dimensions in humans.

Authors:  C von Birgelen; E A de Vrey; G S Mintz; A Nicosia; N Bruining; W Li; C J Slager; J R Roelandt; P W Serruys; P J de Feyter
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-11-04       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Gregg W Stone; Akiko Maehara; Alexandra J Lansky; Bernard de Bruyne; Ecaterina Cristea; Gary S Mintz; Roxana Mehran; John McPherson; Naim Farhat; Steven P Marso; Helen Parise; Barry Templin; Roseann White; Zhen Zhang; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Relationship between intravascular ultrasound guidance and clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stents: the assessment of dual antiplatelet therapy with drug-eluting stents (ADAPT-DES) study.

Authors:  Bernhard Witzenbichler; Akiko Maehara; Giora Weisz; Franz-Josef Neumann; Michael J Rinaldi; D Christopher Metzger; Timothy D Henry; David A Cox; Peter L Duffy; Bruce R Brodie; Thomas D Stuckey; Ernest L Mazzaferri; Ke Xu; Helen Parise; Roxana Mehran; Gary S Mintz; Gregg W Stone
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Quantitative multi-modality imaging analysis of a fully bioresorbable stent: a head-to-head comparison between QCA, IVUS and OCT.

Authors:  Juan Luis Gutiérrez-Chico; Patrick W Serruys; Chrysafios Girasis; Scot Garg; Yoshinobu Onuma; Salvatore Brugaletta; Héctor García-García; Gerrit-Anne van Es; Evelyn Regar
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-02-26       Impact factor: 2.357

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular imaging 2015 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Hiram G Bezerra; Ricardo A Costa; Johan H C Reiber; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur A Stillman; Johan De Sutter; Nico R L Van de Veire
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.357

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.