Literature DB >> 21518687

Clinical expert consensus document on standards for acquisition, measurement and reporting of intravascular ultrasound regression/progression studies.

Gary S Mintz1, Hector M Garcia-Garcia, Stephen J Nicholls, Neil J Weissman, Nico Bruining, Tim Crowe, Jean-Claude Tardif, Patrick W Serruys.   

Abstract

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality despite the widespread use of established medical therapies. This has prompted the search to identify new therapeutic approaches to achieve more effective prevention of cardiovascular events. Considerable interest has focused on the role of surrogate markers of therapeutic efficacy in the early evaluation of novel anti-atherosclerotic therapies. Monitoring changes in the extent of coronary atherosclerosis with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) has been increasingly employed in clinical trials to assess progression and regression of atherosclerosis. This is based on the pivotal role that atherosclerotic plaque plays in the natural history of cardiovascular disease and the acceptance of validated arterial imaging approaches including coronary angiography and carotid intimal-medial thickness by regulatory authorities. The ability to generate high-resolution imaging of the entire thickness of the coronary artery wall permits evaluation of the entire burden of atherosclerotic plaque. In order to understand the differences, similarities, limitations and pitfalls of the IVUS technique among different academic core laboratories, a number of meetings of representatives from these groups were convened in 2007 and 2008. This document is the result of those IVUS methodology meetings that assembled experts from core laboratories to discuss standards for image acquisition, definitions, criteria, analyses, and primary and secondary endpoints.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21518687     DOI: 10.4244/EIJV6I9A195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EuroIntervention        ISSN: 1774-024X            Impact factor:   6.534


  30 in total

Review 1.  The role of intravascular ultrasound in the determination of progression and regression of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Hideaki Kaneda; Mitsuyasu Terashima; Hiroshi Yamaguchi
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.113

2.  Oscillatory wall shear stress is a dominant flow characteristic affecting lesion progression patterns and plaque vulnerability in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Lucas H Timmins; David S Molony; Parham Eshtehardi; Michael C McDaniel; John N Oshinski; Don P Giddens; Habib Samady
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 3.  Noninvasive Imaging of Atherosclerotic Plaque Progression: Status of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography.

Authors:  Veit Sandfort; Joao A C Lima; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 7.792

4.  Evaluation of the influence of cardiac motion on the accuracy and reproducibility of longitudinal measurements and the corresponding image quality in optical frequency domain imaging: an ex vivo investigation of the optimal pullback speed.

Authors:  Kohei Koyama; Kihei Yoneyama; Takanobu Mitarai; Shingo Kuwata; Ken Kongoji; Tomoo Harada; Yoshihiro J Akashi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 5.  Imaging the event-prone coronary artery plaque.

Authors:  Andreas A Giannopoulos; Dominik C Benz; Christoph Gräni; Ronny R Buechel
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Quantification of the focal progression of coronary atherosclerosis through automated co-registration of virtual histology-intravascular ultrasound imaging data.

Authors:  Lucas H Timmins; David S Molony; Parham Eshtehardi; Emad Rasoul-Arzrumly; Adrian Lam; Olivia Y Hung; Michael C McDaniel; John N Oshinski; Don P Giddens; Habib Samady
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Changes in Coronary Plaque Volume: Comparison of Serial Measurements on Intravascular Ultrasound and Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography.

Authors:  Rine Nakanishi; Anas Alani; Suguru Matsumoto; Dong Li; Michael Fahmy; Jeby Abraham; Christopher Dailing; Alexander Broersen; Pieter H Kitslaar; Khurram Nasir; James K Min; Matthew J Budoff
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2018-04-07

8.  Progress in atherosclerotic plaque imaging.

Authors:  Giulia Soloperto; Sergio Casciaro
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2012-08-28

9.  Reproducibility of computed tomography angiography data analysis using semiautomated plaque quantification software: implications for the design of longitudinal studies.

Authors:  Stella-Lida Papadopoulou; Hector M Garcia-Garcia; Alexia Rossi; Chrysafios Girasis; Anoeshka S Dharampal; Pieter H Kitslaar; Gabriel P Krestin; Pim J de Feyter
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Trimodality imaging system and intravascular endoscopic probe: combined optical coherence tomography, fluorescence imaging and ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Shanshan Liang; Teng Ma; Joseph Jing; Xiang Li; Jiawen Li; K Kirk Shung; Qifa Zhou; Jun Zhang; Zhongping Chen
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 3.776

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.