Literature DB >> 25970360

Arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair: technical note, outcomes, and complications.

Eric M Black, Albert Lin, Uma Srikumaran, Nitin Jain, Michael T Freehill.   

Abstract

The goal of this study was to review the authors' initial experience with arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair. Thirty-one patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears underwent arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair over a 15-month period. Preoperatively, demographics and subjective scores were recorded. Postoperatively, pain levels, subjective shoulder values, satisfaction scores, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, complications, and reoperations were noted with a minimum 2-year follow-up. The relationships between pre- and intraoperative variables and outcome scores were determined with univariate analysis. Average patient age was 56 years, and 23 patients (74%) were men. Twenty patients (65%) underwent primary rotator cuff repair, and 11 patients (35%) underwent revision repair. Average time to follow-up was 26 months. Average preoperative pain level and subjective shoulder value were 5.1 of 10 and 35%, respectively. Average postoperative scores included pain level of 0.9 of 10, subjective shoulder value of 84%, satisfaction score of 90.6 of 100, and ASES score of 86.3 of 100. There were 3 (9.7%) major and 2 (6%) minor complications. Patients undergoing revision rotator cuff repair had significantly worse outcomes (pain level, subjective shoulder value, ASES score; P<.05) compared with those undergoing primary repair, and cortical augmentation did not significantly affect outcome. Overall, outcomes after arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair are good, although patients undergoing revision repair do not have the same outcomes as those undergoing primary cuff repair. The procedure is not without complications (9.7% major, 6% minor complications). Cortical augmentation may be used to supplement fixation, although it does not necessarily affect outcomes. Patients without such augmentation may be at increased risk for suture cutout through the bone. Copyright 2015, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25970360      PMCID: PMC4712630          DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20150504-50

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  41 in total

1.  Biomechanical comparison of a single-row versus double-row suture anchor technique for rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  David H Kim; Neal S Elattrache; James E Tibone; Bong-Jae Jun; Sergai N DeLaMora; Ronald S Kvitne; Thay Q Lee
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Cuff integrity after arthroscopic versus open rotator cuff repair: a prospective study.

Authors:  Julie Bishop; Steven Klepps; Ian K Lo; Justin Bird; James N Gladstone; Evan L Flatow
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Biomechanical evaluation of rotator cuff repairs in a sheep model: suture anchors using arthroscopic Mason-Allen stitches compared with transosseous sutures using traditional modified Mason-Allen stitches.

Authors:  Hans-Michael Klinger; Gottfried H Buchhorn; Gabert Heidrich; Enrico Kahl; Mike H Baums
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  Initial fixation strength of massive rotator cuff tears: in vitro comparison of single-row suture anchor and transosseous tunnel constructs.

Authors:  Robert Z Tashjian; Evan Levanthal; David B Spenciner; Andrew Green; Braden C Fleming
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Repair site integrity after arthroscopic transosseous-equivalent suture-bridge rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Joshua B Frank; Neal S ElAttrache; Joshua S Dines; Allie Blackburn; John Crues; James E Tibone
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Biomechanical comparison of single-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair technique versus transosseous repair technique.

Authors:  Stephen L Tocci; Robert Z Tashjian; Evan Leventhal; David B Spenciner; Andrew Green; Braden C Fleming
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  Failure analysis of rotator cuff repair: a comparison of three double-row techniques.

Authors:  Naiquan Zheng; Howard W Harris; James R Andrews
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 8.  Arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: an anatomic and biomechanical rationale for different suture-anchor repair configurations.

Authors:  Brian J Cole; Neal S ElAttrache; Ammar Anbari
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Comparison of the subjective shoulder value and the Constant score.

Authors:  Michael K Gilbart; Christian Gerber
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: prospective functional outcome and repair integrity at minimum 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Brian J Cole; L Pearce McCarty; Richard W Kang; Winslow Alford; Paul B Lewis; Jennifer K Hayden
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 3.019

View more
  11 in total

1.  Arthroscopic trans-osseous rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Claudio Chillemi; Matteo Mantovani
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2017-05-10

2.  Arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair: the eight-shape technique.

Authors:  Claudio Chillemi; Matteo Mantovani; Marcello Osimani; Alessandro Castagna
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-01-25

3.  Comparison of the clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic transosseous and transosseous-equivalent double-row rotator cuff repair techniques.

Authors:  Ahmet Fırat; Mustafa Aydın; Osman Tecimel; Ali Öçgüder; Yavuz Sanisoğlu; Mahmut Uğurlu
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.511

4.  Anchorless Arthroscopic Transosseous and Anchored Arthroscopic Transosseous Equivalent Rotator Cuff Repair Show No Differences in Structural Integrity or Patient-reported Outcomes in a Matched Cohort.

Authors:  Uma Srikumaran; Eric G Huish; Brendan Y Shi; Casey V Hannan; Iman Ali; Kelly G Kilcoyne
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  Linked Double-Row Equivalent Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Leads to Significantly Improved Patient Outcomes.

Authors:  Atsushi Endo; Paul Hoogervorst; Conrad Safranek; Kyle R Sochacki; Marc R Safran; Seth L Sherman; Joseph Donahue
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-07-16

6.  Is Arthroscopic Transosseous Rotator Cuff Repair Strength Dependent on the Tunnel Angle?

Authors:  Daniel Bronsnick; Andrew Pastor; Dmitriy Peresada; Farid Amirouche; Giovanni Francesco Solitro; Benjamin A Goldberg
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-06-06

7.  Needle-Based Arthroscopic Transosseous Rotator Cuff Repair: A Short-Term Outcomes Analysis.

Authors:  Ehud Atoun; John G Horneff; Ofer Levy; Walter Stanwood; Nikhil Verma; Joseph A Abboud
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-02-27

8.  Comparison of Occurrence of Bone Tunnel Laceration, Clinical Results, and Cuff Repair Integrity of Transosseous Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With and Without Lateral Cortical Augmentation.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Hirakawa; Tomoya Manaka; Yoichi Ito; Yoshinobu Matsuda; Katsumasa Nakazawa; Ryosuke Iio; Hiroaki Nakamura
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-06-14

9.  Functional outcomes of arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair using a 2-mm tape suture in a 137-patient cohort.

Authors:  Jean-Étienne Beauchamp; Marc Beauchamp
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-08-05

10.  Optimal Angle of the Bone Tunnel for Avoiding Axillary Nerve Injuries During Arthroscopic Transosseous Rotator Cuff Repair: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Simulation Study.

Authors:  Himanshu Gupta; Pallav Mishra; Himanshu Kataria; Vineet Jain; Amit Raj Tyagi; Harsh Mahajan; Ashish Datt Upadhyay
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-11-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.