Literature DB >> 18658021

Repair site integrity after arthroscopic transosseous-equivalent suture-bridge rotator cuff repair.

Joshua B Frank1, Neal S ElAttrache, Joshua S Dines, Allie Blackburn, John Crues, James E Tibone.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Successful healing after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair remains a challenge. Earlier studies have shown a relatively high rate of failure. New surgical techniques may improve healing potential. The purpose of this study was to provide an objective evaluation of repair site integrity after arthroscopic transosseous-equivalent suture-bridge rotator cuff repair. HYPOTHESIS: Rotator cuff tears repaired using the transosseous-equivalent suture-bridge technique will show a higher intact rate on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation. STUDY
DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS: The first 25 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using the transosseous-equivalent suture-bridge technique underwent MRI evaluation of the postoperative shoulder. Minimum follow-up was 1 year. Demographic, clinical, and surgical factors, including tear size, were evaluated.
RESULTS: Postoperative MRI demonstrated intact surgical repair sites in 22 of 25 patients (88%). Tears limited to the supraspinatus tendon were intact in 16 of 18 patients (89%). Tears of the supraspinatus involving part or all of the infraspinatus showed an 86% intact rate (6 of 7 patients). Of these tears, 3 were considered massive (complete 2-tendon or greater). These demonstrated an intact cuff on MRI.
CONCLUSIONS: The transosseous-equivalent suture-bridge technique demonstrates a high healing rate on imaging studies at 1 year. Of the first 25 patients repaired with the technique, 88% had an intact rotator cuff repair on MRI evaluation. This indicates excellent cuff healing, as judged by the intact repair sites, compared with most standard arthroscopic rotator cuff repair series. In this early report of the technique, a persistent tear could not be correlated with age or initial tear size; however, this may be due to the relatively small sample size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18658021     DOI: 10.1177/0363546507313574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  50 in total

1.  Arthroscopic transosseous (anchorless) rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Raffaele Garofalo; Alessandro Castagna; Mario Borroni; Sumant G Krishnan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Single versus double-row repair of the rotator cuff: does double-row repair with improved anatomical and biomechanical characteristics lead to better clinical outcome?

Authors:  Stephan Pauly; Christian Gerhardt; Jianhai Chen; Markus Scheibel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Primary stability of rotator cuff repair: can more suture materials yield more strength?

Authors:  Mehmet Gülecyüz; Hannes Bortolotti; Matthias Pietschmann; Andreas Ficklscherer; Thomas Niethammer; Björn Roßbach; Peter Müller
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Does an arthroscopic suture bridge technique maintain repair integrity?: a serial evaluation by ultrasonography.

Authors:  Jin-Young Park; Hawa Tahir Siti; Jung-Sup Keum; Sung-Gyu Moon; Kyung-Soo Oh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Free biceps tendon autograft to augment arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Padraic R Obma
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2013-11-01

6.  The effect of multiple channeling on the structural integrity of repaired rotator cuff.

Authors:  Chris Hyunchul Jo; Kang Sup Yoon; Ji Ho Lee; Seung Baik Kang; Jae Hyup Lee; Hyuk Soo Han; Seung Hwan Rhee; Ji Sun Shin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Contact area and pressure in suture bridge rotator cuff repair using knotless lateral anchors.

Authors:  Marc Tompkins; Keith O Monchik; Matthew J Plante; Braden C Fleming; Paul D Fadale
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  [Open double-row rotator cuff repair using the LASA-DR screw].

Authors:  C Schoch; S Geyer; M Geyer
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 1.154

9.  Critical period and risk factors for retear following arthroscopic repair of the rotator cuff.

Authors:  Johannes Barth; Kevin Andrieu; Elias Fotiadis; Gerjon Hannink; Renaud Barthelemy; Mo Saffarini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Tendon-bone contact pressure and biomechanical evaluation of a modified suture-bridge technique for rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Mike H Baums; Michael Geyer; Meike Büschken; Gottfried H Buchhorn; Gunter Spahn; Hans-Michael Klinger
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.