Literature DB >> 32959425

Integrated quantitative susceptibility and R2 * mapping for evaluation of liver fibrosis: An ex vivo feasibility study.

Ramin Jafari1,2, Stefanie J Hectors1, Anne K Koehne de González3, Pascal Spincemaille1, Martin R Prince1, Gary M Brittenham4, Yi Wang1,2.   

Abstract

To develop a method for noninvasive evaluation of liver fibrosis, we investigated the differential sensitivities of quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) and R2 * mapping using corrections for the effects of liver iron. Liver fibrosis is characterized by excessive accumulation of collagen and other extracellular matrix proteins. While collagen increases R2 * relaxation, measures of R2 * for fibrosis are confounded by liver iron, which may be present in the liver over a wide range of concentrations. The diamagnetic collagen contribution to susceptibility values measured by QSM is much less than the contribution of highly paramagnetic iron. In 19 ex vivo liver explants with and without fibrosis, QSM (χ), R2 * and proton density fat fraction (PDFF) maps were constructed from multiecho gradient-recalled echo (mGRE) sequence acquisition at 3 T. Median parameter values were recorded and differences between the MRI parameters in nonfibrotic vs. advanced fibrotic/cirrhotic samples were evaluated using Mann-Whitney U tests and receiver operating characteristic analyses. Logistic regression with stepwise feature selection was employed to evaluate the utility of combined MRI measurements for detection of fibrosis. Median R2 * increased in fibrotic vs. nonfibrotic liver samples (P = .041), while differences in χ and PDFF were nonsignificant (P = .545 and P = .395, respectively). Logistic regression identified the combination of χ and R2 * significant for fibrosis detection (logit [prediction] = -8.45 + 0.23 R2 * - 28.8 χ). For this classifier, a highly significant difference between nonfibrotic vs. advanced fibrotic/cirrhotic samples was observed (P = .002). The model exhibited an AUC of 0.909 (P = .003) for detection of advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis, which was substantially higher compared with AUCs of the individual parameters (AUC 0.591-0.784). An integrated QSM and R2 * analysis of mGRE 3 T imaging data is promising for noninvasive diagnostic assessment of liver fibrosis.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  liver fibrosis; magnetic resonance imaging; quantitative susceptibility mapping

Year:  2020        PMID: 32959425      PMCID: PMC7768551          DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  48 in total

Review 1.  Liver fibrosis -- from bench to bedside.

Authors:  Scott L Friedman
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 25.083

2.  Quantitative MR susceptibility mapping using piece-wise constant regularized inversion of the magnetic field.

Authors:  Ludovic de Rochefort; Ryan Brown; Martin R Prince; Yi Wang
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Simultaneous phase unwrapping and removal of chemical shift (SPURS) using graph cuts: application in quantitative susceptibility mapping.

Authors:  Jianwu Dong; Tian Liu; Feng Chen; Dong Zhou; Alexey Dimov; Ashish Raj; Qiang Cheng; Pascal Spincemaille; Yi Wang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 4.  Cause, Pathogenesis, and Treatment of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis.

Authors:  Anna M Diehl; Christopher Day
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Non invasive fibrosis biomarkers reduce but not substitute the need for liver biopsy.

Authors:  Giada Sebastiani; Alfredo Alberti
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the staging of liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Susanne Bonekamp; Michael S Torbenson; Ihab R Kamel
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.062

7.  Relaxivity-iron calibration in hepatic iron overload: probing underlying biophysical mechanisms using a Monte Carlo model.

Authors:  Nilesh R Ghugre; John C Wood
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 8.  Indications for liver transplantation.

Authors:  Jacqueline G O'Leary; Rita Lepe; Gary L Davis
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  T2* relaxometry in liver, pancreas, and spleen in a healthy cohort of one hundred twenty-nine subjects-correlation with age, gender, and serum ferritin.

Authors:  Nina F Schwenzer; Jürgen Machann; Michael M Haap; Petros Martirosian; Christina Schraml; Gerd Liebig; Norbert Stefan; Hans-Ulrich Häring; Claus D Claussen; Andreas Fritsche; Fritz Schick
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 6.016

10.  Repeatability and reproducibility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the liver.

Authors:  Velicia Bachtiar; Matthew D Kelly; Henry R Wilman; Jaco Jacobs; Rexford Newbould; Catherine J Kelly; Michael L Gyngell; Katherine E Groves; Andy McKay; Amy H Herlihy; Carolina C Fernandes; Mark Halberstadt; Marion Maguire; Naomi Jayaratne; Sophia Linden; Stefan Neubauer; Rajarshi Banerjee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Radiomics nomograms based on R2* mapping and clinical biomarkers for staging of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B: a single-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Die Zhang; Yi Cao; Yi Sun; Xia Zhao; Cheng Peng; Jing Zhao; Xiaohui Bao; Lifei Wang; Chen Zhang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 7.034

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.