Literature DB >> 25956364

Use of reproductive technology for sex selection for nonmedical reasons.

.   

Abstract

Because these practices are ethically controversial, clinics are encouraged to develop and make available their policies on the provision of nonmedical sex selection, and to accommodate their employees' decisions about whether or not to participate in such treatment. Practitioners offering assisted reproductive services are under no ethical obligation to provide or refuse to provide nonmedically indicated methods of sex selection. This document replaces two documents previously published by the ASRM Ethics Committee, titled, "Sex selection and preimplantation genetic diagnosis" (Fertil Steril 2004;82:S245-8) and "Preconception gender selection for nonmedical reasons" (Fertil Steril 2004;82:S232-5).
Copyright © 2015 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Premiplantation genetic testing; assisted reproductive technology; ethics; family balancing; gender; in vitro fertilization

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25956364     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  14 in total

1.  Male-biased infant sex ratios and patterns of induced abortion.

Authors:  Abdool S Yasseen; Thierry Lacaze-Masmonteil
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Sex selection for non-medical indications: a survey of current pre-implantation genetic screening practices among U.S. ART clinics.

Authors:  Sarah M Capelouto; Sydney R Archer; Jerrine R Morris; Jennifer F Kawwass; Heather S Hipp
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Perceptions towards sex selection among Jordanian population: A survey study.

Authors:  Saleem Ali Banihani; Karem H Alzoubi; Mohammad S Shawaqfeh; Senthilvel Vasudevan
Journal:  Andrologia       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 2.532

Review 4.  Regulating Preimplantation Genetic Testing across the World: A Comparison of International Policy and Ethical Perspectives.

Authors:  Margaret E C Ginoza; Rosario Isasi
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 5.  Cross border reproductive care (CBRC): a growing global phenomenon with multidimensional implications (a systematic and critical review).

Authors:  Mahmoud Salama; Vladimir Isachenko; Evgenia Isachenko; Gohar Rahimi; Peter Mallmann; Lynn M Westphal; Marcia C Inhorn; Pasquale Patrizio
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Figuring India and China in the Constitution of Globally Stratified Sex Selection.

Authors:  Rajani Bhatia
Journal:  Asian Bioeth Rev       Date:  2021-01-15

7.  Embryo quality, ploidy, and transfer outcomes in male versus female blastocysts.

Authors:  Christopher P Moutos; William G Kearns; Sarah E Farmer; Jon P Richards; Antonio F Saad; John R Crochet
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 3.357

8.  Comparative preimplantation genetic diagnosis policy in Europe and the USA and its implications for reproductive tourism.

Authors:  Michelle J Bayefsky
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Soc Online       Date:  2016-12

9.  Sex ratios at birth among second-generation mothers of South Asian ethnicity in Ontario, Canada: a retrospective population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Susitha Wanigaratne; Pamela Uppal; Manvir Bhangoo; Alia Januwalla; Deepa Singal; Marcelo L Urquia
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Disparities among infertility patients regarding genetic carrier screening, sex selection, and gene editing.

Authors:  Dana B McQueen; Christopher M Warren; Alexander H Xiao; Lee P Shulman; Tarun Jain
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.