Literature DB >> 35725245

Perceptions towards sex selection among Jordanian population: A survey study.

Saleem Ali Banihani1, Karem H Alzoubi2,3, Mohammad S Shawaqfeh4, Senthilvel Vasudevan4.   

Abstract

Sex selection is becoming a more common practice in the society and worldwide. The current study aimed to examine the perceptions about sex selection options and possible association with sociodemographic factors and relevant characteristics. The study was a cross-sectional survey of adults in Jordan in January and February 2020 using a self-administered questionnaire. Results showed that 40.1% of respondents preferred male gender when having a child, 22.4% of respondents preferred the male gender when having a child, even if they have had children of both genders, and 71.3% preferred having children from both genders. On the other hand, 58.8% of participants preferred a male gender when there is one chance to conceive via assisted reproduction technologies. Also, among participants, 66% thought that sex selection is religiously acceptable, yet 78.0% did not support of the sex selection idea. The above factors were significantly associated with several sociodemographic variables such as gender, marital status, education, career, and place of residence, but not income. In conclusion, the current study shed a light on preferences towards sex selection in a large cohort to better understand the perception and attitude of the population towards this practice.
© 2022 Wiley-VCH GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attitude; population; preference; sex selection; survey

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35725245      PMCID: PMC9444869          DOI: 10.1111/and.14501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Andrologia        ISSN: 0303-4569            Impact factor:   2.532


  22 in total

1.  Sex selection for non-medical indications: a survey of current pre-implantation genetic screening practices among U.S. ART clinics.

Authors:  Sarah M Capelouto; Sydney R Archer; Jerrine R Morris; Jennifer F Kawwass; Heather S Hipp
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Attitudes towards non-invasive prenatal diagnosis among obstetricians in Pakistan, a developing, Islamic country.

Authors:  Shenaz Ahmed; Hussain Jafri; Yasmin Rashid; Gerald Mason; Yasmin Ehsan; Mushtaq Ahmed
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 3.050

3.  A boy or a girl? A Hungarian survey regarding gender selection.

Authors:  Imre Fejes; János Szöllosi; Zoltán Závaczki; Sándor Koloszár; Attila Pál
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.636

4.  Preimplantation sex selection demand and preferences in an infertility population.

Authors:  Tarun Jain; Stacey A Missmer; Raina S Gupta; Mark D Hornstein
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  State-Mandated Insurance Coverage and Preimplantation Genetic Testing in the United States.

Authors:  Bronwyn S Bedrick; Andrew D Tipping; Katelin B Nickel; Joan K Riley; Tarun Jain; Emily S Jungheim
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Attitudes about Sex Selection and Sex Preference in Iranian Couples Referred for Sex Selection Technology.

Authors:  Seyedeh Fatemeh Ahmadi; Mahdi Shirzad; Koorosh Kamali; Fahimeh Ranjbar; Zohreh Behjati-Ardakani; Mohammad Mehdi Akhondi
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

7.  Parents' Preferences for Sex of Children in Sweden: Attitudes and Outcomes.

Authors:  Vitor Miranda; Johan Dahlberg; Gunnar Andersson
Journal:  Popul Res Policy Rev       Date:  2018-03-03

8.  Pre-Implantation Gender Selection: Family Balancing in Jordan.

Authors:  Amer Mahmoud Sindiani; Faheem Zayed; Eman Hussein Alshdaifat; Hasan M Rawashdeh; Wesam Al-Woshah; Nada Zayed
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-07-02

9.  Preconception sex selection for non-medical and intermediate reasons: ethical reflections.

Authors:  G de Wert; W Dondorp
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2010

10.  High and growing disapproval of sex-selection technology in Australia.

Authors:  Rebecca Kippen; Edith Gray; Ann Evans
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 3.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.