Literature DB >> 34086149

Embryo quality, ploidy, and transfer outcomes in male versus female blastocysts.

Christopher P Moutos1, William G Kearns2,3, Sarah E Farmer4, Jon P Richards4, Antonio F Saad5, John R Crochet5,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The goal is to determine if variations exist between male and female blastocysts in preimplantation measurements of quality and ploidy and in vitro fertilization elective single-embryo transfer (eSET) outcomes.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted from a private fertility center's database of blastocysts undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy, along with details of eSET from this screened cohort. Main outcomes included preimplantation embryo quality and sex-specific eSET outcomes.
RESULTS: A total of 3708 embryos from 578 women were evaluated, with 45.9% male and 54.1% female. The majority were High grade. No difference existed between embryo sex and overall morphological grade, inner cell mass or trophectoderm grade, or blastocyst transformation day. Female blastocysts had a higher aneuploidy rate than male blastocysts (P < 0.001). Five hundred thirty-nine eSETs from 392 women were evaluated, with High grade embryos more likely to have implantation (P < 0.001), clinical pregnancy (P < 0.001), and ongoing pregnancy (P = 0.018) than Mid or Low grade embryos. Day 5 blastocysts were more likely to have implantation (P = 0.018), clinical pregnancy (P = 0.005), and ongoing pregnancy (P = 0.018) than day 6 blastocysts. Male and female embryos had similar transfer outcomes, although female day 5 blastocysts were more likely to result in clinical pregnancy (P = 0.012), but not ongoing pregnancy, than female day 6 blastocysts. Male eSET outcomes did not differ by blastocyst transformation day.
CONCLUSION: Male and female embryos have comparable grade and quality; however, female embryos were more likely to be aneuploid. Ongoing pregnancy rates did not differ by embryo sex. Day 5 embryos had more favorable transfer outcomes than day 6 embryos.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aneuploidy; Blastocyst sex; Embryo sex; Preimplantation genetic testing

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34086149      PMCID: PMC8490581          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-021-02250-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.357


  45 in total

Review 1.  Sex-related physiology of the preimplantation embryo.

Authors:  David K Gardner; Mark G Larman; George A Thouas
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 4.025

2.  Use of reproductive technology for sex selection for nonmedical reasons.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Blastocyst embryo transfer is associated with a sex-ratio imbalance in favor of male offspring.

Authors:  Martha Luna; Marlena Duke; Alan Copperman; Lawrence Grunfeld; Benjamin Sandler; Jason Barritt
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  The effect on human sex ratio at birth by assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures--an assessment of babies born following single embryo transfers, Australia and New Zealand, 2002-2006.

Authors:  J H Dean; M G Chapman; E A Sullivan
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  Factors associated with birth outcomes from cryopreserved blastocysts: experience from 4,597 autologous transfers of 7,597 cryopreserved blastocysts.

Authors:  Kevin S Richter; Daniella K Ginsburg; Sharon K Shipley; Josh Lim; Michael J Tucker; James R Graham; Michael J Levy
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Elective embryo transfers on Day 6 reduce implantation compared with transfers on Day 5.

Authors:  V Poulsen; H J Ingerslev; K Kirkegaard
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Trophectoderm grade predicts outcomes of single-blastocyst transfers.

Authors:  Micah J Hill; Kevin S Richter; Ryan J Heitmann; James R Graham; Michael J Tucker; Alan H DeCherney; Paulette E Browne; Eric D Levens
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Live birth sex ratios are not influenced by blastocyst-stage embryo transfer.

Authors:  John M Csokmay; Micah J Hill; Frank V Cioppettini; Kathleen A Miller; Richard T Scott; John L Frattarelli
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-09-06       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Morphological and cytogenetic assessment of cleavage and blastocyst stage embryos.

Authors:  E Fragouli; S Alfarawati; K Spath; D Wells
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 4.025

10.  Outcomes of in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic diagnosis: an analysis of the United States Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance Data, 2011-2012.

Authors:  Jeani Chang; Sheree L Boulet; Gary Jeng; Lisa Flowers; Dmitry M Kissin
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 7.329

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.