Literature DB >> 25955789

Variable Cadence Walking and Ground Adaptive Standing With a Powered Ankle Prosthesis.

Amanda H Shultz, Brian E Lawson, Michael Goldfarb.   

Abstract

This paper describes a control approach that provides walking and standing functionality for a powered ankle prosthesis, and demonstrates the efficacy of the approach in experiments with a unilateral transtibial amputee subject. Both controllers incorporate a finite-state structure that emulates healthy ankle joint behavior via a series of piecewise passive impedance functions. The walking controller additionally modifies impedance parameters based on estimated cadence, while the standing controller modulates the ankle equilibrium angle in order to adapt to the ground slope and user posture, and the supervisory controller selects between the walking and standing controllers. The system is shown to reproduce several essential biomechanical features of the healthy joint during walking, particularly relative to a passive prosthesis, and is shown to adapt to various cadences. The system is also shown to adapt to slopes over a range of ±15°, providing support to the user, as validated by quasi-static stiffness measurements recorded by the prosthesis. The subject is shown to place more weight on the powered prosthesis than on his passive prosthesis when standing on sloped surfaces, particularly at angles of 10° or greater. The authors also demonstrated that the prosthesis typically began providing support within 1 s of initial ground contact. Further, the supervisory controller was shown to effectively switch between walking and standing, as well as determine ground slope just prior to the transition from the standing controller to the walking controller, where the estimated ground slope was accurate to within 1.25° for all trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25955789      PMCID: PMC4627943          DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2015.2428196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng        ISSN: 1534-4320            Impact factor:   3.802


  17 in total

1.  A reliable gait phase detection system.

Authors:  I P Pappas; M R Popovic; T Keller; V Dietz; M Morari
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.802

2.  Energetics of actively powered locomotion using the simplest walking model.

Authors:  Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  The human ankle during walking: implications for design of biomimetic ankle prostheses.

Authors:  Andrew H Hansen; Dudley S Childress; Steve C Miff; Steven A Gard; Kent P Mesplay
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Below-knee amputee gait with dynamic elastic response prosthetic feet: a pilot study.

Authors:  L Torburn; J Perry; E Ayyappa; S L Shanfield
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  1990

5.  Prosthetic intervention effects on activity of lower-extremity amputees.

Authors:  Glenn K Klute; Jocelyn S Berge; Michael S Orendurff; Rhonda M Williams; Joseph M Czerniecki
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Number of pedometer-assessed steps taken per day by adults: a descriptive meta-analysis.

Authors:  Richard W Bohannon
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2007-10-02

7.  Design and Validation of the Ankle Mimicking Prosthetic (AMP-) Foot 2.0.

Authors:  Pierre Cherelle; Victor Grosu; Arnout Matthys; Bram Vanderborght; Dirk Lefeber
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.802

8.  The effect of five prosthetic feet on the gait and loading of the sound limb in dysvascular below-knee amputees.

Authors:  R D Snyder; C M Powers; C Fontaine; J Perry
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  1995-11

9.  Energy-speed relation of below-knee amputees walking on a motor-driven treadmill.

Authors:  N H Molen
Journal:  Int Z Angew Physiol       Date:  1973-03-02

10.  Energy expenditure during ambulation in dysvascular and traumatic below-knee amputees: a comparison of five prosthetic feet.

Authors:  L Torburn; C M Powers; R Guiterrez; J Perry
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  1995-05
View more
  10 in total

1.  Predictive control of intersegmental tarsal movements in an insect.

Authors:  Alicia Costalago-Meruelo; David M Simpson; Sandor M Veres; Philip L Newland
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  A Compact, Lightweight Robotic Ankle-Foot Prosthesis: Featuring a Powered Polycentric Design.

Authors:  Lukas Gabert; Sarah Hood; Minh Tran; Marco Cempini; Tommaso Lenzi
Journal:  IEEE Robot Autom Mag       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 5.143

3.  Design and Validation of a Semi-Active Variable Stiffness Foot Prosthesis.

Authors:  Evan M Glanzer; Peter G Adamczyk
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.802

4.  Accuracy and repeatability of smartphone sensors for measuring shank-to-vertical angle.

Authors:  Brandon T Nguyen; Nick A Baicoianu; Darrin B Howell; Keshia M Peters; Katherine M Steele
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  Impact of Powered Knee-Ankle Prosthesis on Low Back Muscle Mechanics in Transfemoral Amputees: A Case Series.

Authors:  Chandrasekaran Jayaraman; Shenan Hoppe-Ludwig; Susan Deems-Dluhy; Matt McGuire; Chaithanya Mummidisetty; Rachel Siegal; Aileen Naef; Brian E Lawson; Michael Goldfarb; Keith E Gordon; Arun Jayaraman
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Standing on slopes - how current microprocessor-controlled prosthetic feet support transtibial and transfemoral amputees in an everyday task.

Authors:  Michael Ernst; Björn Altenburg; Malte Bellmann; Thomas Schmalz
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 4.262

7.  A Prototype of a Neural, Powered, Transtibial Prosthesis for the Cat: Benchtop Characterization.

Authors:  Hangue Park; Muhammad S Islam; Martha A Grover; Alexander N Klishko; Boris I Prilutsky; Stephen P DeWeerth
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Effect of toe joint stiffness and toe shape on walking biomechanics.

Authors:  Eric C Honert; Gerasimos Bastas; Karl E Zelik
Journal:  Bioinspir Biomim       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 2.956

9.  Bimodal ankle-foot prosthesis for enhanced standing stability.

Authors:  Sara R Koehler-McNicholas; Billie C Savvas Slater; Karl Koester; Eric A Nickel; John E Ferguson; Andrew H Hansen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  On-board Training Strategy for IMU-Based Real-Time Locomotion Recognition of Transtibial Amputees With Robotic Prostheses.

Authors:  Dongfang Xu; Qining Wang
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 2.650

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.