Literature DB >> 25953609

Non-parametric kernel density estimation of species sensitivity distributions in developing water quality criteria of metals.

Ying Wang1, Fengchang Wu, John P Giesy, Chenglian Feng, Yuedan Liu, Ning Qin, Yujie Zhao.   

Abstract

Due to use of different parametric models for establishing species sensitivity distributions (SSDs), comparison of water quality criteria (WQC) for metals of the same group or period in the periodic table is uncertain and results can be biased. To address this inadequacy, a new probabilistic model, based on non-parametric kernel density estimation was developed and optimal bandwidths and testing methods are proposed. Zinc (Zn), cadmium (Cd), and mercury (Hg) of group IIB of the periodic table are widespread in aquatic environments, mostly at small concentrations, but can exert detrimental effects on aquatic life and human health. With these metals as target compounds, the non-parametric kernel density estimation method and several conventional parametric density estimation methods were used to derive acute WQC of metals for protection of aquatic species in China that were compared and contrasted with WQC for other jurisdictions. HC5 values for protection of different types of species were derived for three metals by use of non-parametric kernel density estimation. The newly developed probabilistic model was superior to conventional parametric density estimations for constructing SSDs and for deriving WQC for these metals. HC5 values for the three metals were inversely proportional to atomic number, which means that the heavier atoms were more potent toxicants. The proposed method provides a novel alternative approach for developing SSDs that could have wide application prospects in deriving WQC and use in assessment of risks to ecosystems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25953609     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-4602-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  25 in total

1.  Species sensitivity distributions: data and model choice.

Authors:  J R Wheeler; E P M Grist; K M Y Leung; D Morritt; M Crane
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.553

2.  Better bootstrap estimation of hazardous concentration thresholds for aquatic assemblages.

Authors:  Eric P M Grist; Kenneth M Y Leung; James R Wheeler; Mark Crane
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.742

3.  Quantifying population recovery rates for ecological risk assessment.

Authors:  Lawrence W Barnthouse
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.742

4.  The University of California-Davis methodology for deriving aquatic life pesticide water quality criteria.

Authors:  Patti L Tenbrook; Amanda J Palumbo; Tessa L Fojut; Paul Hann; Joseph Karkoski; Ronald S Tjeerdema
Journal:  Rev Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 7.563

Review 5.  Chlorpyrifos: ecological risk assessment in North American aquatic environments.

Authors:  J P Giesy; K R Solomon; J R Coats; K R Dixon; J M Giddings; E E Kenaga
Journal:  Rev Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 7.563

6.  Development of species sensitivity distributions and estimation of HC(5) of organochlorine pesticides with five statistical approaches.

Authors:  Bin Wang; Gang Yu; Jun Huang; Hongying Hu
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2008-05-08       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  A Bayesian approach for determining the no effect concentration and hazardous concentration in ecotoxicology.

Authors:  David R Fox
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 6.291

8.  Threshold models for species sensitivity distributions applied to aquatic risk assessment for zinc.

Authors:  Nico M van Straalen
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.860

Review 9.  Setting water quality criteria in China: approaches for developing species sensitivity distributions for metals and metalloids.

Authors:  Yuedan Liu; Fengchang Wu; Yunsong Mu; Chenglian Feng; Yixiang Fang; Lulu Chen; John P Giesy
Journal:  Rev Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 7.563

Review 10.  Ecotoxicological evaluation of soil quality criteria.

Authors:  N M van Straalen; C A Denneman
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 6.291

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.