Literature DB >> 12109754

Better bootstrap estimation of hazardous concentration thresholds for aquatic assemblages.

Eric P M Grist1, Kenneth M Y Leung, James R Wheeler, Mark Crane.   

Abstract

The introduction of species sensitivity distribution (SSD) approaches to ecological risk assessment offers the potential for a more transparent scientific basis for the derivation of predicted no-effect concentrations. However, conventional SSD methodologies have relied on standard distributions (e.g., log logistic, log normal) that are not necessarily based on sound ecological or statistical grounds. More recently, bootstrap resampling techniques that do not rely on distributional assumptions have been applied to the problem. Here we describe how a more advanced bootstrap methodology may be applied to derive better point estimates and confidence intervals for SSD estimates of safe environmental concentrations. Motivated by the fact that the true SSD may not fit any standard model category, we go on to consider a hybrid bootstrap regression approach. This can yield a substantially different estimate for the SSD when compared with both the basic bootstrap and the more frequently used parametric curve approaches. With increasing use of SSDs in ecological risk assessment, it is now imperative that the scientific community develops agreement over appropriate methods for their derivation.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12109754

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  8 in total

1.  Development of species sensitivity distributions and estimation of HC(5) of organochlorine pesticides with five statistical approaches.

Authors:  Bin Wang; Gang Yu; Jun Huang; Hongying Hu
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2008-05-08       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  The relative sensitivity of freshwater species to antimony(III): Implications for water quality guidelines and ecological risk assessments.

Authors:  Maximilian Obinna Obiakor; Matthew Tighe; Zhen Wang; Chigozie Damian Ezeonyejiaku; Lily Pereg; Susan C Wilson
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Validity of fish, birds and mammals as surrogates for amphibians and reptiles in pesticide toxicity assessment.

Authors:  Manuel E Ortiz-Santaliestra; Joao P Maia; Andrés Egea-Serrano; Isabel Lopes
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Non-parametric kernel density estimation of species sensitivity distributions in developing water quality criteria of metals.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Fengchang Wu; John P Giesy; Chenglian Feng; Yuedan Liu; Ning Qin; Yujie Zhao
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  A comparison of statistical methods for deriving freshwater quality criteria for the protection of aquatic organisms.

Authors:  Liqun Xing; Hongling Liu; Xiaowei Zhang; Markus Hecker; John P Giesy; Hongxia Yu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Risk characterisation in direct toxicity assessment of the River Esk and the Tees Estuary.

Authors:  Mark Crane; Albania Grosso; Paul Whitehouse; David Forrow
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  Estimating cetacean population trends from static acoustic monitoring data using Paired Year Ratio Assessment (PYRA).

Authors:  Eric P M Grist; Trevelyan J McKinley; Saptarshi Das; Tom Tregenza; Aileen Jeffries; Nicholas Tregenza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Selective pressure of antibiotic pollution on bacteria of importance to public health.

Authors:  Alfredo Tello; Brian Austin; Trevor C Telfer
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 9.031

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.