Literature DB >> 11330918

Thresholds determined using the monotic and dichotic multiple auditory steady-state response technique in normal-hearing subjects.

A T Herdman1, D R Stapells.   

Abstract

Auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) were elicited by presenting single or multiple, 77-105 Hz amplitude-modulated 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz tones to one or both ears. Objectives of this study were to (i) replicate and extend previous multiple ASSR studies in a quiet double-walled sound booth, and (ii) discover differences (if any) between thresholds assessed in monotic and dichotic conditions, which ranged between 15 and 22dB SPL. The present study's behavioural and ASSR thresholds are 0-10 dB lower (better) than results of previous monotic studies. Further, there are no significant differences in ASSR thresholds between dichotic and monotic stimulus conditions. Therefore, dichotic multiple AM tone stimulation does not produce a change in the ASSR that affects threshold estimation in a clinically significant manner. Thus, at least for detecting normal hearing, the dichotic multiple ASSR technique is a feasible method for estimating hearing thresholds that would substantially reduce recording time compared to conventional single-stimulus techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11330918     DOI: 10.1080/010503901750069563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand Audiol        ISSN: 0105-0397


  12 in total

1.  [Audiometric thresholds estimated by auditory steady-state responses. Influence of EEG amplitude and test duration on accuracy].

Authors:  R Mühler; T Rahne
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Evolutionary adaptations for the temporal processing of natural sounds by the anuran peripheral auditory system.

Authors:  Katrina M Schrode; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Validity of correction factors applied to auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) in normal hearing adults in chartr EP system.

Authors:  Zahra Ghasemahmad; Saeid Farahani
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Simultaneous acquisition of 40- and 80-Hz auditory steady-state responses for a direct comparison of response amplitude, residual noise and signal-to-noise ratio.

Authors:  Roland Mühler; Alexandra Petzke; Jesko L Verhey
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Age-related changes in the relationship between auditory brainstem responses and envelope-following responses.

Authors:  Aravindakshan Parthasarathy; Jyotishka Datta; Julie Ann Luna Torres; Charneka Hopkins; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-05-21

6.  [Steady-state responses of the auditory system: a comparison of different methods].

Authors:  S Liebler; S Hoth; P K Plinkert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  Effects of Nonlinear Frequency Compression on ACC Amplitude and Listener Performance.

Authors:  Benjamin James Kirby; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  On the use of envelope following responses to estimate peripheral level compression in the auditory system.

Authors:  Gerard Encina-Llamas; Torsten Dau; Bastian Epp
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The comparison of auditory behavioral and evoked potential responses (steady state and cortical) in subjects with occupational noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  P H DeJonckere; J Lebacq
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2021-05-29

10.  Multiple-ASSR Interactions in Adults with Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Ieda M Ishida; David R Stapells
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-09-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.