Literature DB >> 25947577

Gene transcript analysis blood values correlate with ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-somatostatin analog (SSA) PET/CT imaging in neuroendocrine tumors and can define disease status.

L Bodei1, M Kidd, I M Modlin, V Prasad, S Severi, V Ambrosini, D J Kwekkeboom, E P Krenning, R P Baum, G Paganelli, I Drozdov.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Precise determination of neuroendocrine tumor (NET) disease status and response to therapy remains a rate-limiting concern for disease management. This reflects limitations in biomarker specificity and resolution capacity of imaging. In order to evaluate biomarker precision and identify if combinatorial blood molecular markers and imaging could provide added diagnostic value, we assessed the concordance between (68)Ga-somatostatin analog (SSA) positron emission tomography (PET), circulating NET gene transcripts (NETest), chromogranin A (CgA), and Ki-67 in NETs.
METHODS: We utilized two independent patient groups with positive (68)Ga-SSA PET: data set 1 ((68)Ga-SSA PETs undertaken for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), as primary or salvage treatment, n = 27) and data set 2 ((68)Ga-SSA PETs performed in patients referred for initial disease staging or restaging after various therapies, n = 22). We examined the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), circulating gene transcripts, CgA levels, and baseline Ki-67. Regression analyses, generalized linear modeling, and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were undertaken to determine the strength of the relationships.
RESULTS: SUVmax measured in two centers were mathematically evaluated (regression modeling) and determined to be comparable. Of 49 patients, 47 (96 %) exhibited a positive NETest. Twenty-six (54 %) had elevated CgA (χ(2) = 20.1, p < 2.5×10(-6)). The majority (78 %) had Ki-67 < 20 %. Gene transcript scores were predictive of imaging with >95 % concordance and significantly correlated with SUVmax (R (2) = 0.31, root-mean-square error = 9.4). The genes MORF4L2 and somatostatin receptors SSTR1, 3, and 5 exhibited the highest correlation with SUVmax. Progressive disease was identified by elevated levels of a quotient of MORF4L2 expression and SUVmax [ROC-derived AUC (R (2) = 0.7, p < 0.05)]. No statistical relationship was identified between CgA and Ki-67 and no relationship with imaging parameters was evident.
CONCLUSION: (68)Ga-SSA PET imaging parameters (SUVmax) correlated with a circulating NET transcript signature. Disease status could be predicted by an elevated quotient of gene expression (MORF4L2) and SUVmax. These observations provide the basis for further exploration of strategies that combine imaging parameters and disease-specific molecular data for the improvement of NET management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25947577     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-015-3075-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  41 in total

Review 1.  Somatostatin receptor subtypes: basic pharmacology and tissue distribution.

Authors:  V D Corleto; S Nasoni; F Panzuto; S Cassetta; G Delle Fave
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.088

2.  Procedure guidelines for PET/CT tumour imaging with 68Ga-DOTA-conjugated peptides: 68Ga-DOTA-TOC, 68Ga-DOTA-NOC, 68Ga-DOTA-TATE.

Authors:  Irene Virgolini; Valentina Ambrosini; Jamshed B Bomanji; Richard P Baum; Stefano Fanti; Michael Gabriel; Nikolaos D Papathanasiou; Giovanna Pepe; Wim Oyen; Clemens De Cristoforo; Arturo Chiti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Exploring the rising incidence of neuroendocrine tumors: a population-based analysis of epidemiology, metastatic presentation, and outcomes.

Authors:  Julie Hallet; Calvin How Lim Law; Moises Cukier; Refik Saskin; Ning Liu; Simron Singh
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Differential expression of vesicular monoamine transporter (VMAT) 1 and 2 in gastrointestinal endocrine tumours.

Authors:  A M Jakobsen; P Andersson; G Saglik; E Andersson; L Kölby; J D Erickson; E Forssell-Aronsson; B Wängberg; H Ahlman; O Nilsson
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.996

Review 5.  Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs): new diagnostic and therapeutic challenges.

Authors:  J P Castaño; A Sundin; H R Maecke; C Villabona; R Vazquez-Albertino; E Navarro; K Oberg
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 9.264

6.  Future directions in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors: consensus report of the National Cancer Institute Neuroendocrine Tumor clinical trials planning meeting.

Authors:  Matthew H Kulke; Lillian L Siu; Joel E Tepper; George Fisher; Deborah Jaffe; Daniel G Haller; Lee M Ellis; Jacqueline K Benedetti; Emily K Bergsland; Timothy J Hobday; Eric Van Cutsem; James Pingpank; Kjell Oberg; Steven J Cohen; Mitchell C Posner; James C Yao
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent.

Authors:  Jerome Friedman; Trevor Hastie; Rob Tibshirani
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.440

Review 8.  Therapeutic monitoring of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: the challenges ahead.

Authors:  Anders Sundin; Andrea Rockall
Journal:  Neuroendocrinology       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 4.914

9.  Imaging response in neuroendocrine tumors treated with targeted therapies: the experience of sunitinib.

Authors:  Sandrine Faivre; Maxime Ronot; Chantal Dreyer; Camille Serrate; Olivia Hentic; Mohamed Bouattour; Onorina Bruno; Anne Couvelard; Valérie Vilgrain; Eric Raymond
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 4.493

10.  The identification of gut neuroendocrine tumor disease by multiple synchronous transcript analysis in blood.

Authors:  Irvin M Modlin; Ignat Drozdov; Mark Kidd
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Clinical applications of (epi)genetics in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: Moving towards liquid biopsies.

Authors:  Gitta Boons; Timon Vandamme; Marc Peeters; Guy Van Camp; Ken Op de Beeck
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 6.514

2.  Adding variables to complexity. Molecular imaging and molecular biology: a no-longer-secret liaison in NETs.

Authors:  Annibale Versari; Alessia Ciarrocchi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  The role of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in advanced/metastatic thoracic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Lisa Bodei; Jarosław B Ćwikla; Mark Kidd; Irvin M Modlin
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  Molecular strategies in the management of bronchopulmonary and thymic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Authors:  Irvin M Modlin; Mark Kidd; Pier-Luigi Filosso; Matteo Roffinella; Anna Lewczuk; Jaroslaw Cwikla; Lisa Bodei; Agnieska Kolasinska-Cwikla; Kyung-Min Chung; Margot E Tesselaar; Ignat A Drozdov
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Role of Staging in Patients with Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumours.

Authors:  Ashley Kieran Clift; Omar Faiz; Adil Al-Nahhas; Andreas Bockisch; Marc Olaf Liedke; Erik Schloericke; Harpreet Wasan; John Martin; Paul Ziprin; Krishna Moorthy; Andrea Frilling
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  The Treatment Landscape and New Opportunities of Molecular Targeted Therapies in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Fabiola Amair-Pinedo; Ignacio Matos; Tamara Saurí; Jorge Hernando; Jaume Capdevila
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.493

Review 7.  New frontiers in imaging including radiomics updates for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Authors:  Mohammed Saleh; Priya R Bhosale; Motoyo Yano; Malak Itani; Ahmed K Elsayes; Daniel Halperin; Emily K Bergsland; Ajaykumar C Morani
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-10-23

8.  Measurement of circulating transcripts and gene cluster analysis predicts and defines therapeutic efficacy of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  L Bodei; M Kidd; I M Modlin; S Severi; I Drozdov; S Nicolini; D J Kwekkeboom; E P Krenning; R P Baum; G Paganelli
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Prognostic Significance of Somatostatin Receptor Heterogeneity in Progressive Neuroendocrine Tumor Treated with Lu-177 DOTATOC or Lu-177 DOTATATE.

Authors:  Josephine Graf; Ulrich-Frank Pape; Henning Jann; Timm Denecke; Ruza Arsenic; Winfried Brenner; Marianne Pavel; Vikas Prasad
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  A Delphic consensus assessment: imaging and biomarkers in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor disease management.

Authors:  Kjell Oberg; Eric Krenning; Anders Sundin; Lisa Bodei; Mark Kidd; Margot Tesselaar; Valentina Ambrosini; Richard P Baum; Matthew Kulke; Marianne Pavel; Jaroslaw Cwikla; Ignat Drozdov; Massimo Falconi; Nicola Fazio; Andrea Frilling; Robert Jensen; Klaus Koopmans; Tiny Korse; Dik Kwekkeboom; Helmut Maecke; Giovanni Paganelli; Ramon Salazar; Stefano Severi; Jonathan Strosberg; Vikas Prasad; Aldo Scarpa; Ashley Grossman; Annemeik Walenkamp; Mauro Cives; Irene Virgolini; Andreas Kjaer; Irvin M Modlin
Journal:  Endocr Connect       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.335

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.