Literature DB >> 25939890

The fractionated dipole antenna: A new antenna for body imaging at 7 Tesla.

Alexander J E Raaijmakers1, Michel Italiaander2, Ingmar J Voogt1, Peter R Luijten1, Johannes M Hoogduin1, Dennis W J Klomp1, Cornelis A T van den Berg3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Dipole antennas in ultrahigh field MRI have demonstrated advantages over more conventional designs. In this study, the fractionated dipole antenna is presented: a dipole where the legs are split into segments that are interconnected by capacitors or inductors.
METHODS: A parameter study has been performed on dipole antenna length using numerical simulations. A subsequent simulation study investigates the optimal intersegment capacitor/inductor value. The resulting optimal design has been constructed and compared to a previous design, the single-side adapted dipole (SSAD) by simulations and measurements. An array of eight elements has been constructed for prostate imaging on four subjects (body mass index 20-27.5) using 8 × 2 kW amplifiers.
RESULTS: For prostate imaging at 7T, lowest peak local specific-absorption rate (SAR) levels are achieved if the antenna is 30 cm or longer. A fractionated dipole antenna design with inductors between segments has been chosen to achieve even lower SAR levels and more homogeneous receive sensitivities.
CONCLUSION: With the new design, good quality prostate images are acquired. SAR levels are reduced by 41% to 63% in comparison to the SSAD. Coupling levels are moderate (average nearest neighbor: -14.6 dB) for each subject and prostate B1+ levels range from 12 to 18 μT.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body imaging; Dipole antenna; Prostate imaging; Transceive array; Ultrahigh field

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25939890     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  58 in total

1.  A method to assess the loss of a dipole antenna for ultra-high-field MRI.

Authors:  Gang Chen; Christopher M Collins; Daniel K Sodickson; Graham C Wiggins
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Evaluation of a 16-channel transceiver loop + dipole antenna array for human head imaging at 10.5 tesla.

Authors:  Myung Kyun Woo; Lance DelaBarre; Byeong-Yeul Lee; Matt Waks; Russell Luke Lagore; Jerahmie Radder; Yigitcan Eryaman; Kamil Ugurbil; Gregor Adriany
Journal:  IEEE Access       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.367

3.  Real-time assessment of potential peak local specific absorption rate value without phase monitoring: Trigonometric maximization method for worst-case local specific absorption rate determination.

Authors:  Ettore Flavio Meliadò; Alessandro Sbrizzi; Cornelis A T van den Berg; Peter R Luijten; Alexander J E Raaijmakers
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Electrodynamics and radiofrequency antenna concepts for human magnetic resonance at 23.5 T (1 GHz) and beyond.

Authors:  Lukas Winter; Thoralf Niendorf
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  Improving radiofrequency power and specific absorption rate management with bumped transmit elements in ultra-high field MRI.

Authors:  Alireza Sadeghi-Tarakameh; Gregor Adriany; Gregory J Metzger; Russell L Lagore; Steve Jungst; Lance DelaBarre; Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele; Kamil Ugurbil; Ergin Atalar; Yigitcan Eryaman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  First in-vivo human imaging at 10.5T: Imaging the body at 447 MHz.

Authors:  Xiaoxuan He; M Arcan Ertürk; Andrea Grant; Xiaoping Wu; Russell L Lagore; Lance DelaBarre; Yiğitcan Eryaman; Gregor Adriany; Eddie J Auerbach; Pierre-François Van de Moortele; Kâmil Uğurbil; Gregory J Metzger
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Advancing RF pulse design using an open-competition format: Report from the 2015 ISMRM challenge.

Authors:  William A Grissom; Kawin Setsompop; Samuel A Hurley; Jeffrey Tsao; Julia V Velikina; Alexey A Samsonov
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  A rigid, stand-off hybrid dipole, and birdcage coil array for 7 T body imaging.

Authors:  Jan Paška; Martijn A Cloos; Graham C Wiggins
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-12-17       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Optimizing the ICE decoupling element distance to improve monopole antenna arrays for 7 Tesla MRI.

Authors:  Xinqiang Yan; Xiaoliang Zhang; Rong Xue; John C Gore; William A Grissom
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 2.546

10.  Excitation and RF Field Control of a Human-Size 10.5-T MRI System.

Authors:  Patrick Bluem; Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele; Gregor Adriany; Zoya Popović
Journal:  IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 3.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.