Literature DB >> 25931440

The Role of Gastroesophageal Reflux and Other Factors during Progression to Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

William D Hazelton1, Kit Curtius2, John M Inadomi3, Thomas L Vaughan4, Rafael Meza5, Joel H Rubenstein6, Chin Hur7, E Georg Luebeck8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: U.S. esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) incidence increased over 5-fold between 1975 and 2009. Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (sGERD) elevates the risk for EAC. However, a simple calculation suggests that changes in sGERD prevalence can explain at most approximately 16% of this trend. Importantly, a mechanistic understanding of the influence of sGERD and other factors (OF) on EAC is lacking.
METHODS: A multiscale model was developed to estimate temporal trends for sGERD and OF, and their mechanistic role during carcinogenesis. Model calibration was to Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) incidence and age-dependent sGERD data using maximum likelihood and Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods.
RESULTS: Among men, 77.8% [95% credibility interval (CI), 64.9%-85.6%] of the incidence trend is attributable to OF, 13.4% (95% CI, 11.4%-17.3%) to sGERD, and 8.8% (95% CI, 4.2%-13.7%) to sGERD-OF interactions. Among women, 32.6% (95% CI, 27.0%-39.9%) of the trend is attributable to OF, 13.6% (95% CI, 12.5%-15.9%) to sGERD, and 47.4% (95% CI, 30.7%-64.6%) to interactions. The predicted trends were compared with historical trends for obesity, smoking, and proton pump inhibitor use. Interestingly, predicted OF cohort trends correlated most highly with median body mass index (BMI) at age 50 (r = 0.988 for men; r = 0.998 for women).
CONCLUSIONS: sGERD and OF mechanistically increase premalignant cell promotion, which increases EAC risk exponentially with exposure duration. IMPACT: Surveillance should target individuals with long-duration sGERD and OF exposures. ©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25931440      PMCID: PMC4491004          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0323-T

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  58 in total

1.  United States life tables, 2000.

Authors:  Elizabeth Arias
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2002-12-19

2.  Prevalence and clinical spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota.

Authors:  G R Locke; N J Talley; S L Fett; A R Zinsmeister; L J Melton
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  The trend of BMI values of US adults by deciles, birth cohorts 1882-1986 stratified by gender and ethnicity.

Authors:  John Komlos; Marek Brabec
Journal:  Econ Hum Biol       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 2.184

4.  Overweight and obesity in the United States: prevalence and trends, 1960-1994.

Authors:  K M Flegal; M D Carroll; R J Kuczmarski; C L Johnson
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  1998-01

5.  Predictors of progression in Barrett's esophagus II: baseline 17p (p53) loss of heterozygosity identifies a patient subset at increased risk for neoplastic progression.

Authors:  B J Reid; L J Prevo; P C Galipeau; C A Sanchez; G Longton; D S Levine; P L Blount; P S Rabinovitch
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Dyspepsia and dyspepsia subgroups: a population-based study.

Authors:  N J Talley; A R Zinsmeister; C D Schleck; L J Melton
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Risk factors associated with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  G R Locke; N J Talley; S L Fett; A R Zinsmeister; L J Melton
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Natural history of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease diagnosed in general practice.

Authors:  A Ruigómez; L A García Rodríguez; M-A Wallander; S Johansson; H Graffner; J Dent
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 8.171

9.  Selectively advantageous mutations and hitchhikers in neoplasms: p16 lesions are selected in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Carlo C Maley; Patricia C Galipeau; Xiaohong Li; Carissa A Sanchez; Thomas G Paulson; Brian J Reid
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  The cohort effect and Helicobacter pylori.

Authors:  N Banatvala; K Mayo; F Megraud; R Jennings; J J Deeks; R A Feldman
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 5.226

View more
  17 in total

1.  Alterations to the Esophageal Microbiome Associated with Progression from Barrett's Esophagus to Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Erik J Snider; Griselda Compres; Daniel E Freedberg; Hossein Khiabanian; Yael R Nobel; Stephania Stump; Anne-Catrin Uhlemann; Charles J Lightdale; Julian A Abrams
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 2.  Evolution of Premalignant Disease.

Authors:  Kit Curtius; Nicholas A Wright; Trevor A Graham
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 3.  Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: How Common Are They Really?

Authors:  Aaron P Thrift
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 4.  Global burden and epidemiology of Barrett oesophagus and oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Aaron P Thrift
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 46.802

5.  An age-period-cohort analysis of obesity and incident esophageal adenocarcinoma among white males.

Authors:  Caitlin C Murphy; Y Claire Yang; Nicholas J Shaheen; Wayne L Hofstetter; Robert S Sandler
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.429

Review 6.  Field carcinogenesis and biological significance of the potential of the bystander effect: carcinogenesis, therapeutic response, and tissue regeneration.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kuwano; Takehiko Yokobori; Tatsuya Miyazaki; Makoto Sohda; Tomonori Yoshida; Yoko Azuma; Hironori Tatsuki; Yasunari Ubukata; Nobuhiro Nakazawa; Kengo Kuriyama; Akihiko Sano; Makoto Sakai; Hiroomi Ogawa; Hiroshi Saeki; Ken Shirabe
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Robot-assisted transthoracic hybrid esophagectomy versus open and laparoscopic hybrid esophagectomy: propensity score matched analysis of short-term outcome.

Authors:  Therese Reinstaller; Daniela Adolf; Eric Lorenz; Roland S Croner; Frank Benedix
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 8.  An evolutionary perspective on field cancerization.

Authors:  Kit Curtius; Nicholas A Wright; Trevor A Graham
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 60.716

9.  Case Studies of Gastric, Lung, and Oral Cancer Connect Etiologic Agent Prevalence to Cancer Incidence.

Authors:  Andrew F Brouwer; Marisa C Eisenberg; Rafael Meza
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  A Systematic Approach to Determining the Identifiability of Multistage Carcinogenesis Models.

Authors:  Andrew F Brouwer; Rafael Meza; Marisa C Eisenberg
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 4.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.