Literature DB >> 1551533

Dyspepsia and dyspepsia subgroups: a population-based study.

N J Talley1, A R Zinsmeister, C D Schleck, L J Melton.   

Abstract

It has been proposed that patients with dyspepsia can be classified into symptom groupings that may represent different pathophysiological entities; however, it remains to be shown that distinct symptom subgroups exist. To estimate the prevalence of dyspepsia (defined as upper abdominal pain) and dyspepsia subgroups, an age- and sex-stratified random sample of Olmsted County, Minnesota, residents, aged 30-64 years, were mailed a valid self-report questionnaire; 82% responded (n = 835). Subgroups were as follows: those with symptoms suggestive of peptic ulceration (ulcerlike dyspepsia), those with gastric stasis (dysmotilitylike dyspepsia), those with gastroesophageal reflux (refluxlike dyspepsia), and the remainder (unspecified dyspepsia). Ulcerlike dyspepsia was the commonest subgroup (prevalence, 16.0/100; 95% confidence interval, 13.4-18.5), but 43% of subjects with dyspepsia could be classified into more than one subgroup. Nearly one third of dyspeptics also had irritable bowel symptoms, but these were not confined to any particular dyspepsia subgroup. Although dyspepsia is very common in the community and the majority have ulcerlike symptoms, there is such overlap among the dyspepsia subgroups that a classification based on symptoms alone in uninvestigated patients may not be useful.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1551533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  199 in total

1.  Functional dyspepsia of ulcer-dysmotility type: clinical incidence and therapeutic strategy.

Authors:  Xiao-Zhong Wang; Gu-Zhen Lin
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Natural history of dyspepsia.

Authors:  Lars Agréus
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Dyspepsia, peptic ulcer disease, and esophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Mark D Schwartz
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2002-03

4.  Lump or split dyspepsia? A continuing controversy.

Authors:  N J Talley; S Thitiphuree
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2001-06

5.  Consensus guidelines for evaluating and treating patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms in the primary care setting.

Authors:  M J Whitaker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  The impact of obesity on the rise in esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence: estimates from a disease simulation model.

Authors:  Chung Yin Kong; Kevin J Nattinger; Tristan J Hayeck; Zehra B Omer; Y Claire Wang; Stuart J Spechler; Pamela M McMahon; G Scott Gazelle; Chin Hur
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Heliobacter Pylori and Non-ulcer Dyspepsia.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-08

8.  Functional dyspepsia: bye-bye to PPIs.

Authors:  O Nyrén
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Homozygous 825T allele of the GNB3 protein influences the susceptibility of Japanese to dyspepsia.

Authors:  Tomomitsu Tahara; Tomiyasu Arisawa; Tomoyuki Shibata; Fangyu Wang; Masakatsu Nakamura; Mikijyu Sakata; Ichiro Hirata; Hiroshi Nakano
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Composite score of reflux symptoms in diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Jin-Hai Wang; Jin-Yan Luo; Lei Dong; Jun Gong; Ai-Li Zuo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.