Literature DB >> 11693316

Predictors of progression in Barrett's esophagus II: baseline 17p (p53) loss of heterozygosity identifies a patient subset at increased risk for neoplastic progression.

B J Reid1, L J Prevo, P C Galipeau, C A Sanchez, G Longton, D S Levine, P L Blount, P S Rabinovitch.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Most patients with Barrett's esophagus do not progress to cancer, but those who do seem to have markedly increased survival when cancers are detected at an early stage. Most surveillance programs are based on histological assessment of dysplasia, but dysplasia is subject to observer variation and transient diagnoses of dysplasia increase the cost of medical care. We have previously validated flow cytometric increased 4N fractions and aneuploidy as predictors of progression to cancer in Barrett's esophagus. However, multiple somatic genetic lesions develop during neoplastic progression in Barrett's esophagus, and it is likely that a panel of objective biomarkers will be required to manage the cancer risk optimally.
METHODS: We prospectively evaluated endoscopic biopsies from 325 patients with Barrett's esophagus, 269 of whom had one or more follow-up endoscopies, by a robust platform for loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analysis, using baseline 17p (p53) LOH as a predictor and increased 4N, aneuploidy, high-grade dysplasia, and esophageal adenocarcinoma as outcomes.
RESULTS: The prevalence of 17p (p53) LOH at baseline increased from 6% in negative for dysplasia to 57% in high-grade dysplasia (p < 0.001). Patients with 17p (p53) LOH had increased rates of progression to cancer (relative risk [RR] = 16, p < 0.001), high-grade dysplasia (RR = 3.6, p = 0.02), increased 4N (RR = 6.1, p < 0.001), and aneuploidy (RR = 7.5, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with 17p (p53) LOH are at increased risk for progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma as well as high-grade dysplasia, increased 4N, and aneuploidy. 17p (p53) LOH is a predictor of progression in Barrett's esophagus that can be combined with a panel of other validated biomarkers for risk assessment as well as intermediate endpoints in prevention trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11693316      PMCID: PMC1808263          DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.04236.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  70 in total

1.  17p (p53) allelic losses, 4N (G2/tetraploid) populations, and progression to aneuploidy in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  P C Galipeau; D S Cowan; C A Sanchez; M T Barrett; M J Emond; D S Levine; P S Rabinovitch; B J Reid
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  p53: puzzle and paradigm.

Authors:  L J Ko; C Prives
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1996-05-01       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Oesophageal cancer is an uncommon cause of death in patients with Barrett's oesophagus.

Authors:  A van der Burgh; J Dees; W C Hop; M van Blankenstein
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  Barrett's esophagus: a model of human neoplastic progression.

Authors:  K Neshat; C A Sanchez; P C Galipeau; D S Cowan; S Ramel; D S Levine; B J Reid
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1994

5.  Genotypic analysis of multiple loci in somatic cells by whole genome amplification.

Authors:  M T Barrett; B J Reid; G Joslyn
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1995-09-11       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  [Profile of p53 mutations and abnormal expression of P53 protein in 2 forms of esophageal cancer].

Authors:  F Muzeau; J F Fléjou; F Potet; J Belghiti; G Thomas; R Hamelin
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin Biol       Date:  1996

7.  Allelotype analysis of esophageal adenocarcinomas: evidence for the involvement of sequences on the long arm of chromosome 4.

Authors:  Z T Hammoud; Z Kaleem; J D Cooper; R S Sundaresan; G A Patterson; P J Goodfellow
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1996-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Determination of the frequency of loss of heterozygosity in esophageal adenocarcinoma by cell sorting, whole genome amplification and microsatellite polymorphisms.

Authors:  M T Barrett; P C Galipeau; C A Sanchez; M J Emond; B J Reid
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  1996-05-02       Impact factor: 9.867

9.  Esophageal adenocarcinoma associated with Barrett's esophagus: long-term management with laser ablation.

Authors:  A Ertan; M Zimmerman; M Younes
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Determinants of survival following the diagnosis of esophageal adenocarcinoma (United States).

Authors:  D C Farrow; T L Vaughan
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.506

View more
  110 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers and molecular diagnosis of gastrointestinal and pancreatic neoplasms.

Authors:  Shelby D Melton; Robert M Genta; Rhonda F Souza
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 46.802

2.  Medical and endoscopic management of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  K K Wang; J M Tian; E Gorospe; J Penfield; G Prasad; T Goddard; M Wongkeesong; N S Buttar; L Lutzke; S Krishnadath
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 3.429

3.  Can extent of high grade dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus predict the presence of adenocarcinoma at oesophagectomy?

Authors:  M S Dar; J R Goldblum; T W Rice; G W Falk
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Serum selenium levels in relation to markers of neoplastic progression among persons with Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Rebecca E Rudolph; Thomas L Vaughan; Alan R Kristal; Patricia L Blount; Douglas S Levine; Patricia C Galipeau; Laura J Prevo; Carissa A Sanchez; Peter S Rabinovitch; Brian J Reid
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-05-21       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 5.  Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Peters; Jeffrey A Hagen; Steven R DeMeester
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Early events during neoplastic progression in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Brian J Reid
Journal:  Cancer Biomark       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.388

Review 7.  [Barrett's esophagus. An update].

Authors:  G B Baretton; D E Aust
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 8.  Screening and surveillance for Barrett's esophagus: current issues and future directions.

Authors:  Sung E Choi; Chin Hur
Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.287

Review 9.  Barrett's Esophagus: A Comprehensive and Contemporary Review for Pathologists.

Authors:  Bita V Naini; Rhonda F Souza; Robert D Odze
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 10.  An evolutionary perspective on field cancerization.

Authors:  Kit Curtius; Nicholas A Wright; Trevor A Graham
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 60.716

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.