| Literature DB >> 25931059 |
Georgi L Dakovski1, Philip Heimann1, Michael Holmes1, Oleg Krupin1, Michael P Minitti1, Ankush Mitra1, Stefan Moeller1, Michael Rowen1, William F Schlotter1, Joshua J Turner1.
Abstract
The Soft X-ray Research instrument provides intense ultrashort X-ray pulses in the energy range 280-2000 eV. A diverse set of experimental stations may be installed to investigate a broad range of scientific topics such as ultrafast chemistry, highly correlated materials, magnetism, surface science, and matter under extreme conditions. A brief description of the main instrument components will be given, followed by some selected scientific highlights.Entities:
Keywords: FEL; X-ray; materials science; spectroscopy; ultrafast
Year: 2015 PMID: 25931059 PMCID: PMC4416666 DOI: 10.1107/S160057751500301X
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Synchrotron Radiat ISSN: 0909-0495 Impact factor: 2.616
Figure 1Overview of the SXR instrument layout. Distances are indicated in meters from the interaction region (IR). (GC) gas cell, (TSS) transmission sample system, (TT) timetool, (GMON) grating monochromator, (S&D) slits and diagnostics, (GMD) gas monitor detector, (POL) polarizer, (KB) Kirkpatrick–Baez mirrors, (L-IN) laser in-coupling. The sample at the SXR instrument is located approximately 176 m downstream of the undulators.
X-ray parameters and capabilities of the SXR instrument
| Instrument name | SXR |
| Mirrors, incidence angle | 3 B4C on Si, 14mrad |
| Monochromaticity ( | 1 103 (SASE), 2 104 (self-seeding) |
| Energy range (eV) | 2802000 |
| Unfocused beam size (m) | 2700 at 700eV |
| Focused beam size (m) | 2 |
| Focusing optics | Bendable KB (B4C on Si) |
| Flux (photons pulse1) | Up to 1013
|
| Pulse length (fs) | 5200 |
| Repetition rate (Hz) | 120, 60, 30, 10, 5, 1, on demand |
| Optical laser pulse energy (mJ) | 20 (800nm), 45 (400nm), 1 (266nm) |
| Optical laser pulse width (fs) | 10150 |
| Standard detectors | pnCCD, MCP, APD, PI-MTE, Andor |
Typical single-shot value.
Excluding beamline and instrument transmission.
Figure 2An ultrafast laser pulse heats the metal surface and initiates the process of CO desorption from the Ru surface. Snapshots of the electronic states of oxygen are captured in X-ray absorption (right) and emission (left) spectra. Figure reprinted with permission from Dell’Angela et al. (2013 ▶).
Figure 3A THz pulse resonant with an electromagnon excites spin motion in the sample. An X-ray pulse resonant with the Mn L 2-edge measures the response as changes in the intensity of the (0 q 0) diffraction peak. (a) Peak intensity response of the driving electric field. (b) Peak intensity response with opposite sign of the driving field. (c) The response disappears when the sample is warmed up above the spin-cycloid phase. Figure reprinted with permission from Kubacka et al. (2014 ▶).
Figure 4Maps of Gd24Fe66.5Co9.5 using scanning transmission electron microscopy with elemental sensitivity from energy-dispersive X-rays indicate the presence of nanoscale fluctuations in the iron and gadolinium concentrations. (a) Time evolution of the magnetization in the Gd-rich and Fe-rich regions compared with the sample average. (b) Time-resolved angular momentum flow into the Gd-rich regions. Figure reprinted with permission from Graves et al. (2013 ▶).
Figure 5Intensity of spectrally resolved Kα emission as a function of incident FEL excitation energy. Emission peaks from single and double K-shell hole are present. The results are compared with simulations incorporating radiative-collisional effects. Figure reprinted with permission from Vinko et al. (2012 ▶).