Literature DB >> 15577486

Reasons for revision hip surgery: a retrospective review.

John C Clohisy1, George Calvert, Frank Tull, Douglas McDonald, William J Maloney.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the indications for contemporary revision hip surgery in a consecutive series of patients. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records and radiographs of 439 revision hip surgeries done between 1996 and 2003. Fifty-five percent of the surgeries were for aseptic loosening, 14% were for instability, 13% were for osteolysis around a well-fixed implant, 7% were for infection, 5% were for periprosthetic fracture, 3% were for conversion of a hemiarthroplasty, 1% was for psoas impingement, 1% was for loose recalled implants, and 1% was for implant fracture. As expected, aseptic loosening was the most common reason for revision surgery. Instability was a common reason for early revision whereas revision for osteolysis around a well-fixed implant was a more common reason for late revision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15577486     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000150126.73024.42

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  70 in total

1.  Subsidence of a cementless femoral component influenced by body weight and body mass index.

Authors:  Christoph Stihsen; Roman Radl; Armin Keshmiri; Peter Rehak; Reinhard Windhager
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Is routine mid-term total hip arthroplasty surveillance beneficial?

Authors:  James A Keeney; Bradley S Ellison; William J Maloney; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The incidence of acetabular osteolysis in young patients with conventional versus highly crosslinked polyethylene.

Authors:  Nathan A Mall; Ryan M Nunley; Jin Jun Zhu; William J Maloney; Robert L Barrack; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  The fate of grafting acetabular defects during revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Nathan A Mall; Ryan M Nunley; Kirk E Smith; William J Maloney; John C Clohisy; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Preoperative anemia in total joint arthroplasty: is it associated with periprosthetic joint infection?

Authors:  Max Greenky; Kishor Gandhi; Luis Pulido; Camilo Restrepo; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  What are the risk factors for post-operative infection after hip hemiarthroplasty? Systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Thibaut Noailles; Kévin Brulefert; Antoine Chalopin; Pierre Marie Longis; François Gouin
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  The antibacterial effects of zinc ion migration from zinc-based glass polyalkenoate cements.

Authors:  D Boyd; H Li; D A Tanner; M R Towler; J G Wall
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Risk factors for early revision after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christopher J Dy; Kevin J Bozic; Ting Jung Pan; Timothy M Wright; Douglas E Padgett; Stephen Lyman
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.794

9.  THA with highly cross-linked polyethylene in patients 50 years or younger.

Authors:  Derek S Shia; John C Clohisy; Mark F Schinsky; John M Martell; William J Maloney
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Blockade of JNK and NFAT pathways attenuates orthopedic particle-stimulated osteoclastogenesis of human osteoclast precursors and murine calvarial osteolysis.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Yamanaka; John C F Clohisy; Hiroshi Ito; Takeo Matsuno; Yousef Abu-Amer
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.494

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.