| Literature DB >> 25927938 |
Maria Rosaria D'Apice1, Antonio Novelli2, Alessandra di Masi3, Michela Biancolella4, Antonio Antoccia5, Francesca Gullotta6,7, Norma Licata8,9, Daniela Minella10, Barbara Testa11, Anna Maria Nardone12, Giampiero Palmieri13, Emma Calabrese14, Livia Biancone15, Caterina Tanzarella16, Marina Frontali17, Federica Sangiuolo18,19, Giuseppe Novelli20,21,22, Francesco Pallone23.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Copy number variations (CNVs) can contribute to genetic variation among individuals and/or have a significant influence in causing diseases. Many studies consider new CNVs' effects on protein family evolution giving rise to gene duplicates or losses. "Unsuccessful" duplicates that remain in the genome as pseudogenes often exhibit functional roles. So, changes in gene and pseudogene number may contribute to development or act as susceptibility alleles of diseases. CASEEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25927938 PMCID: PMC4422118 DOI: 10.1186/s12881-015-0164-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Genet ISSN: 1471-2350 Impact factor: 2.103
Figure 1Ileocolonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy. (A) Presence of multiple areas of brownish “alligator skin” appearance of the intestinal mucosa, associated with disappearance of the vascular pattern and tubular aspect of the colon. (B) Histological analysis of a biopsy specimen taken from the distal ileum during ileocolonoscopy showed several apoptotic cells in along the epithelial cells lining the crypts (arrows). (C) EGDS of the gastric antrum showed multiple areas of brownish (“alligator skin”) appearance of the mucosa, in the absence of active erosions or ulcers. (D) The second portion of the duodenum showed multiple whitish spots compatible but not specific for lymphangiectasia. (E) SBCE showed the presence of multiple whitish spots in the second part of the duodenum (confirming findings at EGDS) extending to the proximal jejunum. (F) SBCE showed multiple subcentimetric nodular areas covered by normal mucosa in the jejunum and ileum, compatible with nodular lymphoid hyperplasia.
Figure 2Microdeletion characterization. (A) For the array-CGH profile of chromosome 8, clones are ordered on the X axis from pter to qter according to physical mapping position. The Y axis (blue and red) mark the normalized hybridization Cy5:Cy3 and Cy3:Cy5 ratios of the two arrays. Black arrow showed microdeletion of a single clone (RP11-96G1) on 8q21.2 (ratio plot: 0.67 in both experiments). (B) Confirmation of array CGH results using FISH analysis with RP11-96G1 clone. White arrow shows the chromosome 8 containing the microdeletion. (C–D) FISH with RP11-133G2 and RP11-179B4, overlapping partially the deleted clone, showed that microdeletion spreads out along ~150 Kb. (E) The panel shows the deleted region in 8q21.2 cytogenetic band using the UCSC browser, in which the involved BAC clone and genes are displayed.
Figure 3Gene expression results. (A) Relative expression of the REXO1L1 gene measured in several cell lines by RT-PCR. CaCo-2, HCT116, SW480, and SW620 = human colon cancer cell lines, MCF-7 and MCF12F = human breast cancer cell lines, M = marker. (B) Relative expression of the REXO1L1 gene measured by RT-PCR in HEK293T (Human Embryonic Kidney 293) cells after irradiation (5 Gy) as compared to untreated cells. (C) Differentially expressed genes identified by microarray analysis in proband’s fibroblasts are grouped according to the biological process in which are involved.
Figure 4DNA damaging analysis. (A) MN frequency scored in binucleated cells. (B) Analysis of the DSBs rejoining capability of patient’s cells by PFGE after 1, 2, 6 and 24 hrs from 40 Gy X-ray treatment. (C) The number of phosphorylated H2AX (γ-H2AX) foci scored in cells treated with 1 Gy of X-rays and harvested 0.5, 6 and 24 hs later. (D) Analysis of apoptotic cells in a patient’s fibroblasts compared to HFFF2 cells.