Literature DB >> 12083509

Studying genomes through the aeons: protein families, pseudogenes and proteome evolution.

Paul M Harrison1, Mark Gerstein.   

Abstract

Protein families can be used to understand many aspects of genomes, both their "live" and their "dead" parts (i.e. genes and pseudogenes). Surveys of genomes have revealed that, in every organism, there are always a few large families and many small ones, with the overall distribution following a power-law. This commonality is equally true for both genes and pseudogenes, and exists despite the fact that the specific families that are enlarged differ greatly between organisms. Furthermore, because of family structure there is great redundancy in proteomes, a fact linked to the large number of dispensable genes for each organism and the small size of the minimal, indispensable sub-proteome. Pseudogenes in prokaryotes represent families that are in the process of being dispensed with. In particular, the genome sequences of certain pathogenic bacteria (Mycobacterium leprae, Yersinia pestis and Rickettsia prowazekii) show how an organism can undergo reductive evolution on a large scale (i.e. the dying out of families) as a result of niche change. There appears to be less pressure to delete pseudogenes in eukaryotes. These can be divided into two varieties, duplicated and processed, where the latter involves reverse transcription from an mRNA intermediate. We discuss these collectively in yeast, worm, fly, and human. The fly has few pseudogenes apparently because of its high rate of genomic DNA deletion. In the other three organisms, the distribution of pseudogenes on the chromosome and amongst different families is highly non-uniform. Pseudogenes tend not to occur in the middle of chromosome arms, and tend to be associated with lineage-specific (as opposed to highly conserved) families that have environmental-response functions. This may be because, rather than being dead, they may form a reservoir of diverse "extra parts" that can be resurrected to help an organism adapt to its surroundings. In yeast, there may be a novel mechanism involving the [PSI+] prion that potentially enables this resurrection. In worm, the pseudogenes tend to arise out of families (e.g. chemoreceptors) that are greatly expanded in it compared to the fly. The human genome stands out in having many processed pseudogenes. These have a character very different from those of the duplicated variety, to a large extent just representing random insertions. Thus, their occurrence tends to be roughly in proportion to the amount of mRNA for a particular protein and to reflect the extent of the intergenic sequences. Further information about pseudogenes is available at http://genecensus.org/pseudogene

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12083509     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2836(02)00109-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  59 in total

1.  Comprehensive analysis of amino acid and nucleotide composition in eukaryotic genomes, comparing genes and pseudogenes.

Authors:  Nathaniel Echols; Paul Harrison; Suganthi Balasubramanian; Nicholas M Luscombe; Paul Bertone; Zhaolei Zhang; Mark Gerstein
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Millions of years of evolution preserved: a comprehensive catalog of the processed pseudogenes in the human genome.

Authors:  Zhaolei Zhang; Paul M Harrison; Yin Liu; Mark Gerstein
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  TopNet: a tool for comparing biological sub-networks, correlating protein properties with topological statistics.

Authors:  Haiyuan Yu; Xiaowei Zhu; Dov Greenbaum; John Karro; Mark Gerstein
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Protein families and TRIBES in genome sequence space.

Authors:  Anton J Enright; Victor Kunin; Christos A Ouzounis
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  The DNA sequence of chromosome I of an African trypanosome: gene content, chromosome organisation, recombination and polymorphism.

Authors:  Neil Hall; Matthew Berriman; Nicola J Lennard; Barbara R Harris; Christiane Hertz-Fowler; Emmanuelle N Bart-Delabesse; Caroline S Gerrard; Rebecca J Atkin; Andrew J Barron; Sharen Bowman; Sarah P Bray-Allen; Frédéric Bringaud; Louise N Clark; Craig H Corton; Ann Cronin; Robert Davies; Jonathon Doggett; Audrey Fraser; Eric Grüter; Sarah Hall; A David Harper; Mike P Kay; Vanessa Leech; Rebecca Mayes; Claire Price; Michael A Quail; Ester Rabbinowitsch; Christopher Reitter; Kim Rutherford; Jürgen Sasse; Sarah Sharp; Ratna Shownkeen; Annette MacLeod; Sonya Taylor; Alison Tweedie; C Michael R Turner; Andrew Tait; Keith Gull; Bart Barrell; Sara E Melville
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  A new role for expressed pseudogenes as ncRNA: regulation of mRNA stability of its homologous coding gene.

Authors:  Yoshihisa Yano; Rintaro Saito; Noriyuki Yoshida; Atsushi Yoshiki; Anthony Wynshaw-Boris; Masaru Tomita; Shinji Hirotsune
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2004-05-18       Impact factor: 4.599

7.  Cryptic genetic variation is enriched for potential adaptations.

Authors:  Joanna Masel
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-12-30       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Genomic fossils as a snapshot of the human transcriptome.

Authors:  Ronen Shemesh; Amit Novik; Sarit Edelheit; Rotem Sorek
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-23       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Mystery of intron gain.

Authors:  Alexei Fedorov; Scott Roy; Larisa Fedorova; Walter Gilbert
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Parallel inactivation of multiple GAL pathway genes and ecological diversification in yeasts.

Authors:  Chris Todd Hittinger; Antonis Rokas; Sean B Carroll
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-09-20       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.