Meaghann S Weaver1, Katherine E Heinze2, Cynthia J Bell3, Lori Wiener4, Amy M Garee5, Katherine P Kelly6, Robert L Casey7, Anne Watson8, Pamela S Hinds. 1. Department of Oncology, Children's National Health System, Washington, DC, USA Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA Meaghann.Weaver@StJude.org. 2. School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. 3. College of Nursing, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA Hospice of Michigan Institute, Detroit, MI, USA. 4. Pediatric Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. 5. Department of Oncology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA. 6. Department of Nursing Research and Quality Outcomes, Children's National Health System, Washington, DC, USA. 7. Department of Psychology, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA. 8. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Children's National Health System, Washington DC, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite standardization in disease assessments and curative interventions for childhood cancer, palliative assessments and psychosocial interventions remain diverse and disparate. AIM: Identify current approaches to palliative care in the pediatric oncology setting to inform development of comprehensive psychosocial palliative care standards for pediatric and adolescent patients with cancer and their families. Analyze barriers to implementation and enabling factors. DESIGN: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines framed the search strategy and reporting. Data analysis followed integrative review methodology. DATA SOURCES: Four databases were searched in May 2014 with date restrictions from 2000 to 2014: PubMed, Cochrane, PsycINFO, and Scopus. A total of 182 studies were included for synthesis. Types of studies included randomized and non-randomized trials with or without comparison groups, qualitative research, prior reviews, expert opinion, and consensus report. RESULTS: Integration of patient, parent, and clinician perspectives on end-of-life needs as gathered from primary manuscripts (using NVivo coding for first-order constructs) revealed mutual themes across stakeholders: holding to hope, communicating honestly, striving for relief from symptom burden, and caring for one another. Integration of themes from primary author palliative care outcome reports (second-order constructs) revealed the following shared priorities in cancer settings: care access; cost analysis; social support to include primary caregiver support, sibling care, bereavement outreach; symptom assessment and interventions to include both physical and psychological symptoms; communication approaches to include decision-making; and overall care quality. CONCLUSION: The study team coordinated landmark psychosocial palliative care papers into an informed conceptual model (third-order construct) for approaching pediatric palliative care and psychosocial support in oncology settings.
BACKGROUND: Despite standardization in disease assessments and curative interventions for childhood cancer, palliative assessments and psychosocial interventions remain diverse and disparate. AIM: Identify current approaches to palliative care in the pediatric oncology setting to inform development of comprehensive psychosocial palliative care standards for pediatric and adolescent patients with cancer and their families. Analyze barriers to implementation and enabling factors. DESIGN: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines framed the search strategy and reporting. Data analysis followed integrative review methodology. DATA SOURCES: Four databases were searched in May 2014 with date restrictions from 2000 to 2014: PubMed, Cochrane, PsycINFO, and Scopus. A total of 182 studies were included for synthesis. Types of studies included randomized and non-randomized trials with or without comparison groups, qualitative research, prior reviews, expert opinion, and consensus report. RESULTS: Integration of patient, parent, and clinician perspectives on end-of-life needs as gathered from primary manuscripts (using NVivo coding for first-order constructs) revealed mutual themes across stakeholders: holding to hope, communicating honestly, striving for relief from symptom burden, and caring for one another. Integration of themes from primary author palliative care outcome reports (second-order constructs) revealed the following shared priorities in cancer settings: care access; cost analysis; social support to include primary caregiver support, sibling care, bereavement outreach; symptom assessment and interventions to include both physical and psychological symptoms; communication approaches to include decision-making; and overall care quality. CONCLUSION: The study team coordinated landmark psychosocial palliative care papers into an informed conceptual model (third-order construct) for approaching pediatric palliative care and psychosocial support in oncology settings.
Authors: Veronica Dussel; Steven Joffe; Joanne M Hilden; Jan Watterson-Schaeffer; Jane C Weeks; Joanne Wolfe Journal: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med Date: 2010-03
Authors: John A Heath; Naomi E Clarke; Maria McCarthy; Susan M Donath; Vicki A Anderson; Joanne Wolfe Journal: J Paediatr Child Health Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 1.954
Authors: Veronica Dussel; Ulrika Kreicbergs; Joanne M Hilden; Jan Watterson; Caron Moore; Brian G Turner; Jane C Weeks; Joanne Wolfe Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2008-06-06 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Lori Wiener; Elizabeth Ballard; Tara Brennan; Haven Battles; Pedro Martinez; Maryland Pao Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Pamela S Hinds; Linda L Oakes; Judy Hicks; Brent Powell; Deo Kumar Srivastava; Sheri L Spunt; Joann Harper; Justin N Baker; Nancy K West; Wayne L Furman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-10-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Meaghann S Weaver; Katherine E Heinze; Katherine P Kelly; Lori Wiener; Robert L Casey; Cynthia J Bell; Joanne Wolfe; Amy M Garee; Anne Watson; Pamela S Hinds Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Erica C Kaye; Courtney A Gushue; Samantha DeMarsh; Jonathan Jerkins; April Sykes; Zhaohua Lu; Jennifer M Snaman; Lindsay Blazin; Liza-Marie Johnson; Deena R Levine; R Ray Morrison; Justin N Baker Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2017-12-08 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Ursula M Sansom-Daly; Claire E Wakefield; Pandora Patterson; Richard J Cohn; Abby R Rosenberg; Lori Wiener; Joanna E Fardell Journal: J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol Date: 2019-10-29 Impact factor: 2.223
Authors: Eve Namisango; Katherine Bristowe; Matthew J Allsop; Fliss E M Murtagh; Melanie Abas; Irene J Higginson; Julia Downing; Richard Harding Journal: Patient Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 3.883