Literature DB >> 19805693

"Trying to be a good parent" as defined by interviews with parents who made phase I, terminal care, and resuscitation decisions for their children.

Pamela S Hinds1, Linda L Oakes, Judy Hicks, Brent Powell, Deo Kumar Srivastava, Sheri L Spunt, Joann Harper, Justin N Baker, Nancy K West, Wayne L Furman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: When a child's cancer progresses beyond current treatment capability, the parents are likely to participate in noncurative treatment decision making. One factor that helps parents to make these decisions and remain satisfied with them afterward is deciding as they believe a good parent would decide. Because being a good parent to a child with incurable cancer has not been formally defined, we conducted a descriptive study to develop such a definition.
METHODS: In face-to-face interviews, 62 parents who had made one of three decisions (enrollment on a phase I study, do not resuscitate status, or terminal care) for 58 patients responded to two open-ended questions about the definition of a good parent and about how clinicians could help them fulfill this role. For semantic content analysis of the interviews, a rater panel trained in this method independently coded all responses. Inter-rater reliability was excellent.
RESULTS: Among the aspects of the definition qualitatively identified were making informed, unselfish decisions in the child's best interest, remaining at the child's side, showing the child that he is cherished, teaching the child to make good decisions, advocating for the child with the staff, and promoting the child's health. We also identified 15 clinician strategies that help parents be a part of making these decisions on behalf of a child with advanced cancer.
CONCLUSION: The definition and the strategies may be used to guide clinicians in helping parents fulfill the good parent role and take comfort afterward in having acted as a good parent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19805693      PMCID: PMC2793041          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.0204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  26 in total

Review 1.  Consensus report on the ethics of foregoing life-sustaining treatments in the critically ill. Task Force on Ethics of the Society of Critical Care Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Decision making by parents and healthcare professionals when considering continued care for pediatric patients with cancer.

Authors:  P S Hinds; L Oakes; W Furman; P Foppiano; M S Olson; A Quargnenti; J Gattuso; B Powell; D K Srivastava; D Jayawardene; J T Sandlund; C Strong
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.172

3.  American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics: Guidelines on foregoing life-sustaining medical treatment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Life support decisions for children: what do parents value?

Authors:  M S Kirschbaum
Journal:  ANS Adv Nurs Sci       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.824

5.  American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Bioethics and Committee on Hospital Care. Palliative care for children.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Parental perspectives on end-of-life care in the pediatric intensive care unit.

Authors:  Elaine C Meyer; Jeffrey P Burns; John L Griffith; Robert D Truog
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Spiritual and religious components of patient care in the neonatal intensive care unit: sacred themes in a secular setting.

Authors:  E A Catlin; J H Guillemin; M M Thiel; S Hammond; M L Wang; J O'Donnell
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2001 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.521

8.  Advance care planning for children with special health care needs: a survey of parental attitudes.

Authors:  R H Wharton; K R Levine; S Buka; L Emanuel
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 9.  Sustaining hope when communicating with terminally ill patients and their families: a systematic review.

Authors:  Josephine M Clayton; Karen Hancock; Sharon Parker; Phyllis N Butow; Sharon Walder; Sue Carrick; David Currow; Davina Ghersi; Paul Glare; Rebecca Hagerty; Ian N Olver; Martin H N Tattersall
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.894

10.  Mothers of children with chronic conditions: supportive and stressful interactions with partners and professionals regarding caregiving burdens.

Authors:  M J Stewart; J A Ritchie; P McGrath; D Thompson; B Bruce
Journal:  Can J Nurs Res       Date:  1994
View more
  75 in total

Review 1.  Palliative Care as a Standard of Care in Pediatric Oncology.

Authors:  Meaghann S Weaver; Katherine E Heinze; Katherine P Kelly; Lori Wiener; Robert L Casey; Cynthia J Bell; Joanne Wolfe; Amy M Garee; Anne Watson; Pamela S Hinds
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.167

2.  Changes in siblings after the death of a child from cancer.

Authors:  Terrah L Foster; Mary Jo Gilmer; Kathryn Vannatta; Maru Barrera; Betty Davies; Mary S Dietrich; Diane L Fairclough; Cynthia A Gerhardt
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.592

3.  Practical communication guidance to improve phase 1 informed consent conversations and decision-making in pediatric oncology.

Authors:  Liza-Marie Johnson; Angela C Leek; Dennis Drotar; Robert B Noll; Susan R Rheingold; Eric D Kodish; Justin N Baker
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Communicating With Pediatric Families at End-of-Life Is Not a Fantasy.

Authors:  Connie M Ulrich; Kim Mooney-Doyle; Christine Grady
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 11.229

5.  Core Functions of Communication in Pediatric Medicine: an Exploratory Analysis of Parent and Patient Narratives.

Authors:  Bryan A Sisk; Annie B Friedrich; Jessica Mozersky; Heidi Walsh; James DuBois
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  When health care professionals say "more" and parents say "enough".

Authors:  R A Greenberg; K Weingarten
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.253

Review 7.  Establishing psychosocial palliative care standards for children and adolescents with cancer and their families: An integrative review.

Authors:  Meaghann S Weaver; Katherine E Heinze; Cynthia J Bell; Lori Wiener; Amy M Garee; Katherine P Kelly; Robert L Casey; Anne Watson; Pamela S Hinds
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 4.762

Review 8.  Pediatric palliative care-when quality of life becomes the main focus of treatment.

Authors:  Eva Bergstraesser
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 3.183

9.  The parent perspective: "being a good parent" when making critical decisions in the PICU.

Authors:  Tessie W October; Kiondra R Fisher; Chris Feudtner; Pamela S Hinds
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.624

10.  Why Do Parents Want to Know their Child's Carrier Status? A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Danya F Vears; Clare Delany; John Massie; Lynn Gillam
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.