| Literature DB >> 25918249 |
Neng Wang1, Zhiyu Wang1,2, Yu Wang3, Xiaoming Xie4, Jiangang Shen1, Cheng Peng5, Jieshu You1, Fu Peng1, Hailin Tang4, Xinyuan Guan6, Jianping Chen1,5.
Abstract
<span class="Disease">Breast cancer stem cells (CSCs) are considered as the root of mammary <span class="Disease">tumorigenesis. Previous studies have demonstrated that ISL efficiently limited the activities of breast CSCs. However, the cancer prevention activities of ISL and its precise molecular mechanisms remain largely unknown. Here, we report a novel function of ISL as a natural demethylation agent targeting WIF1 to prevent breast cancer. ISL administration suppressed in vivo breast cancer initiation and progression, accompanied by reduced CSC-like populations. A global gene expression profile assay further identified WIF1 as the main response gene of ISL treatment, accompanied by the simultaneous downregulation of β-catenin signaling and G0/G1 phase arrest in breast CSCs. In addition, WIF1 inhibition significantly relieved the CSC-limiting effects of ISL and methylation analysis further revealed that ISL enhanced WIF1 gene expression via promoting the demethylation of its promoter, which was closely correlated with the inhibition of DNMT1 methyltransferase. Molecular docking analysis finally revealed that ISL could stably dock into the catalytic domain of DNMT1. Taken together, our findings not only provide preclinical evidence to demonstrate the use of ISL as a dietary supplement to inhibit mammary carcinogenesis but also shed novel light on WIF1 as an epigenetic target for breast cancer prevention.Entities:
Keywords: DNMT1; Isoliquiritigenin; WIF1 demethylation; cancer stem cells; mammary tumorigenesis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25918249 PMCID: PMC4496402 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.3396
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1ISL inhibited mammary carcinogenesis in MMTV-PyMT transgenic mice
A. Schematic illustration of ISL administration. Mice were randomly divided into vehicle and ISL treatment groups, and ISL was given by oral gavage at 50 mg/kg/d from the 3rd to the 12th week (n = 10 mice, total of 100 glands); B. Tumor incidence ratios between the vehicle and ISL treatment groups were compared using a log-rank test. The results revealed that ISL significantly inhibited breast cancer occurrence (P < 0.001); C. Tumor volumes of each group were measured from the 4th to the 12th weeks. Tumor volume was calculated based on ex vivo caliper measurements of individual tumors using the formula V = (W2× L)/2, where V is tumor volume, W is tumor width, and L is tumor length. The results indicated that ISL significantly inhibited tumor growth (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, values represented as the Mean ± SD, n = 10). D. Whole mount staining of abdominal mammary glands of mice from the 4th to 12th weeks in the wild type, vehicle, and ISL intervention groups; E. Representative H&E staining images of mouse mammary glands from the 4th to the 12th weeks in the wild type, vehicle, and ISL intervention groups. F. Representative immunohistochemical images of Ki 67 staining in mouse mammary glands from the 4th to the 12th weeks in the wild type, vehicle, and ISL intervention groups.
Figure 2ISL inhibited breast cancer growth and lung metastasis in MMTV-PyMT transgenic mice
A. Representative images of tumors and lungs dissected from vehicle or ISL-treated mice. H&E staining was utilized to observe tumor micromorphology of each group with 400 fold magnification; B. Scatter plot of individual tumors and the mean tumor volume (red line) and the SEM derived from mice tumors at the end of ISL treatment (50 mg/kg/d); C. Mean tumor burden per mouse at the experimental endpoint, analyzed by Student's t test. Tumor burden per mouse was calculated as tumor weight per body weight (*P < 0.05, values represented as the mean ± SD, n = 10); D. Mean metastatic nodule count in each group at the experimental endpoint was compared (***P < 0.001, values represented as the mean ± SD, n = 10); E. Mouse survival in the vehicle and ISL intervention groups is shown by the Kaplan-Meier curve.
Figure 3Identification of WIF1 as the main target of ISL by microarray profiling
A. Representative SP analysis using primary mouse mammary cells freshly harvested from the spontaneous mammary tumors of vehicle or ISL-treated MMTV-PyMT mice. The SP (the framed area) was shown as a percentage of the viable cell population and analyzed by FlowJo software; B. The ALDEFLUOR assay was then used to determine the population of CSCs in the spontaneous mammary tumors of vehicle or ISL-treated MMTV-PyMT mice. An ALDH-specific inhibitor DEAB was used as a negative control for minimizing background fluorescence. ALDHhi cells were shown as cells residing in the framed area analyzed by FlowJo software; C. Affymetrix Mouse Gene 2.0 ST GeneChip was utilized to reveal the gene expression changes after ISL treatment in MMTV-PyMT mice. Through GeneSpring12.6 analysis, 132 genes were upregulated, whereas 117 genes were downregulated; D. 14 genes including Smad7, Bmp2, Klf4, Abca12, Abca9, Ca4, Fzd4, Nkd1, Nkd2, Ptch2, Shh, Axin2, WIF1 and Dkk1 were identified as CSC-related genes affected by ISL. Real-time PCR analysis was then applied to validate their expression changes and WIF1 was finally determined as the main response gene of ISL.
Figure 4ISL significantly elevated WIF1 expression in MMTV-PyMT mice
A. Real-time PCR analysis revealed that ISL significantly increased WIF1 mRNA expression in mammary tumors of MMTV-PyMT mice at the end of the experiment; B–C. Western blotting and immunohistochemistry analysis further confirmed that ISL gradually increased WIF1 expression from the 4th to the 12th week.
Figure 5ISL limited the self-renewal ability of breast CSCs
A. Representative dot plots of CD44+CD24−/low cell surface markers in MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells using the BD FACSAria SORP cell sorter. Breast cancer cells were incubated with 25 or 50 μM ISL for 24 h. CD44-FITC and CD24-PE antibodies were utilized to frame CSC-like subsets in the lower right quadrant (Q3). The isotype-matched antibody served as a negative control. The data analysis was performed using FlowJo software (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, values represented as the mean ± SD, n = 3). The results suggested that ISL administration significantly reduced the CSCs population in both cancer cells in a dose-dependent manner; B. The ALDEFLUOR assay was then used to determine the population of CSCs in MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells after ISL administration. The ALDH-specific inhibitor DEAB was used as a negative control for minimizing background fluorescence. ALDHhi cells were shown as cells residing in the framed area analyzed by FlowJo software; time-dependent manner in both CSCs. C. Effects of ISL on the primary, secondary and tertiary mammospheres formed by the sorted CSCs from MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells. The CSCs were incubated with or without ISL (10, 25 or 50 μM) for 7 days. The number and size of the mammospheres were determined using fluorescence microscopy (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 vs. negative control of the 1st passage spheres; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 vs. negative control of the 2nd passage spheres; ^P < 0.05, ^^P < 0.01, ^^^P < 0.001 vs. negative control of the 3rd passage spheres, values represented as the mean ± SD, n = 3); the results showed that ISL administration could significantly limit the number and size of mammospheres formed by both CSCs populations; D. The effects of ISL on cell cycle distributions of the sorted CSCs from MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells. The CSCs were incubated with or without 25 μM ISL at 24 h and 48 h and then subjected to cell cycle investigation analyzed by Modifit LT software. The results indicated that ISL arrested cell cycle at G0/G1 phase in a time-dependent manner in both CSCs.
Figure 6ISL resulted in overexpression of WIF1 levels in human breast cancer cell lines
Breast cancer cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of ISL for different times and collected for A. Real-time PCR and B. western blotting analysis. The results indicated that following ISL treatment, WIF1 expression in both cancer cell lines reached the maximum level at 24 h and then began to decrease with time increasing; C. The distribution of WIF1 in MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells after ISL treatment was studied by immunofluorescence analysis. The nuclei were counterstained by DAPI. Fluorescent images were obtained using a Carl Zeiss LSM710 META laser scanning confocal microscope and were analyzed with ZEN software.
Figure 7ISL inhibited breast CSCs in a WIF1-dependent manner
A. MDA-MB-231 cells treated with ISL at varying concentrations or time intervals were assayed by western blotting for β-catenin (cytoplasmic and nuclear) and ALDH1A3 antigen. β-actin and Lamin B were used as cytoplasmic and nuclear protein loading controls, respectively. The results indicated that ISL administration inhibits ALDH1A3 and β-catenin expression in a dose-and time-dependent manner; B. The relative β-catenin mRNA levels and the transcriptional activities of its downstream genes before and after ISL treatment in MDA-MB-231 were determined by real-time PCR analysis. (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, values represented as the mean ± SD, n = 3); C. Breast CSCs of MDA-MB-231 were cultured in ISL-treated CM, and 2 or 4 μg/ml WIF1 neutralizing antibody was added to the culture system. Western blotting results revealed that WIF1 inhibition relieved the β-catenin-inhibitory effects of ISL, accompanied by the reactivation of Cyclin D1 and the phosphorylation of GSK-3β and AKT; D. WIF1 inhibition reversed the inhibitory effects of ISL on CSC populations in MDA-MB-231 cells; E. WIF1 inhibition abrogated the inhibitory effects of ISL on the mammosphere formation ability of CSCs. Breast CSCs were cultured in ISL-treated CM, and WIF1 neutralizing antibody was added to the culture system at 2 or 4 μg/ml. The number and size of the primary and secondary mammospheres were determined using fluorescence microscopy after 7 days (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs. negative control of the 1st passage spheres, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs. negative control of the 2nd passage spheres, values represented as the mean ± SD, n = 3).
Figure 8ISL elevated WIF1 expression by promoter demethylation through inhibiting DNMT1 expression
A. MSP analysis was conducted on bisulfite-modified genomic DNA harvested from MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 in the presence or absence of ISL at varying concentrations. The results indicated that ISL significantly increased the expression of unmethylated WIF1 promoter DNA fragments; B. BGS analysis further confirmed that ISL significantly demethylated the promoter region of WIF1 in both breast cancer cells. For BGS lollipop-style representation, filled (black) circles correspond to methylated Cs, and unfilled (white) circles correspond to unmethylated Cs. Each row represents the sequencing results from a single clone. For BGS aggregated representation, each box corresponds to one CpG position in the genomic sequence. The colored bars summarize the methylation states of all sequences at that position; C. Western blotting and immunohistochemistry analysis indicated that ISL significantly inhibited the level of DNMT1 expression rather than DNMT3b; D. DNMT1 mRNA levels in MDA-MB-231 cells and tumor tissues before and after ISL treatment were assessed by RT-PCR, and normalized to β-actin or GAPDH internal control. (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, values represented as the mean ± SD, n = 3); E. Left panel: DNMT1 siRNA administration further enhanced the stimulatory effects of ISL on WIF1 expression, indicating the critical role of DNMT1 in mediating the demethylation effects of ISL; Right panel: ISL inhibited the expression of SP1.
Figure 9The molecular binding mode of ISL with the catalytic domain within DNMT1
It was predicted by the LigandFit algorithm in Discovery Studio 2.5 using the homology-docking template of 3SWR. It was found that ISL could form stable hydrogen bonds with four active residues including GLU1168, GLU1266, ARG1312 and ASN1578. Meanwhile, ISL could also form a strong π–π interaction with TRP1170. Blue dashed lines, hydrogen bonds; orange line, π–π interactions.
Primers used for PCR and sequence analysis
| (F): 5′-GGAAGCAAGTACTTCACAAGGG-3′ | |
| (R):5′-GGAAAGTCACTAGGAGCAGGG-3′ | |
| (F): 5′-ACCCCCATCACCTTAGTCG-3′ | |
| (R):5′-GAAAATCCATTGGGTATCTGGA-3′ | |
| (F): 5′-AGATCTGTACCGCAGGCACT-3′ | |
| (R):5′-GTTCCTCCACGGCTTCTTC-3′ | |
| (F): 5′-CGGGAAGGGAGAAGACACT-3′ | |
| (R):5′-GAGTTCCTCACGCCAACG-3′ | |
| (F): 5′-CCTGCTAAACCAGACGATCC-3′ | |
| (R): 5′-ACTTGCACAAAGGGGTTCC-3′ | |
| (F): 5′-TGGAAGAATACAGCCTCTCACA-3′ | |
| (R):5′-GCTTCTTCGCCAAAGTCGT-3′ | |
| (F): 5′-CAAACCAAGGATCCTAGAAGCA-3′ | |
| (R):5′-GGGGACTGCTGATTCTCCTT-3′ | |
| (F): 5′-AACTTTCACGCCGCTCAT-3′ | |
| (R):5′-CCGAACAAAGGAAGAACTGC-3′ | |
| (F): 5′-CACTGTTGGTCGAGGCACT-3′ | |
| (R):5′-CACTTCTAGGGGGAAGTCGTC-3′ | |
| (F): 5′-GCTATACACCACCGCAGGTC-3′ | |
| (R):5′-GCAGGCTCATTAGCTGGTATG-3′ | |
| (F): 5′-TGGAGGGATGTCCAGTGC-3′ | |
| (R):5′-TGCCAGACATCCTGTGACC-3′ | |
| (F): 5′-GGCAGACACTGCAATAAGAGG-3′ | |
| (R): 5′-TTAAGTGAAGGCGTGTGTCG-3′ | |
| (F): 5′-CCGGGAACTACTGCAAAAAT-3′ | |
| (R):5′-CCAAGGTTTTCAATGATGCTT-3′ | |
| (F): 5′-ACAGCTGCTGAGGGCAGA-3′ | |
| (R):5′-CCCGGAAGTGCTCGTACA-3′ | |
| (F): 5′-CCAATTACAACCCCGACATC-3′ | |
| (R):5′-GCATTTAACTTGTCTTTGCACCT-3′ | |
| (F): 5′-CCAATTACAACCCCGACATC-3′ | |
| (R): 5′-GCATTTAACTTGTCTTTGCACCT-3′ | |
| (F): 5′-GCTTTCAGTTGAGCTGACCA-3′ | |
| (R): 5′-CAAGTCCA AGATCAGCAGTCTC-3′ | |
| (F): 5′-AGGCCGGTGCTGAGTATGTC-3′ | |
| (R): 5′-TGCCTGCTTCACCACCTTCT-3′ | |
| (F): 5′-GCTGCTTAGACGCTGGATTT-3′ | |
| (R): 5′-TAACGTTGAGGGGCATCG-3′ | |
| (F): 5′-CAATTTGCCAAGCTCT GA-3′ | |
| (R): 5′-AGATGGTCGTTTGGCTGAAT-3′ | |
| (F): 5′-CAATTTGCCAAGCTCCTGA-3′ | |
| (R): 5′-AGATGGTCGTTTGGCTGAAT-3′ | |
| (F): 5′-CCAACCGCGAGAAGATGA-3′ | |
| (R): 5′-CCAGAGGCGTACAG GGATAG-3′ | |
| Methylation-specific primers | |
| (F): 5′-GGGCGTTTTATTGGGCGTAT-3′ | |
| (R): 5′-AAACCAACAATCAACGAAC-3′ | |
| Unmethylation-specific primers | |
| (F): 5′-GGGTGTTTTATTGGGTGTAT-3′ | |
| (R): 5′-AAACCAACAATCAACAAAAC-3′ | |
| (F): 5′-GAGTGATGTTTTAGGGGTTT-3′ | |
| (R): 5′-CCTAAATACCAAAAAACCTAC-3′ |