| Literature DB >> 35546462 |
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to elucidate the molecular network mechanism of the Rujiling capsule in the treatment of hyperplasia of mammary glands through network pharmacology and molecular docking.Entities:
Keywords: Hyperplasia of mammary glands; Rujiling; molecular docking; network pharmacology
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35546462 PMCID: PMC9249152 DOI: 10.4103/ijp.ijp_374_21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Pharmacol ISSN: 0253-7613 Impact factor: 2.833
Figure 1Wayne diagram of intersection targets of active components and disease
Figure 2Network diagram of “traditional Chinese medicine-active ingredient-target”
Related information of the six main active compounds
| MOL ID | Molecule name | MW | OB (%) | DL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOL000422 | Kaempferol | 286.25 | 41.88 | 0.24 |
| MOL000098 | Quercetin | 302.25 | 46.43 | 0.28 |
| MOL001789 | Isoliquiritigenin | 256.27 | 85.32 | 0.15 |
| MOL000006 | Luteolin | 286.25 | 36.16 | 0.25 |
| MOL000472 | Emodin | 270.25 | 24.4 | 0.24 |
| MOL000008 | Apigenin | 270.25 | 23.06 | 0.21 |
MW=Molecularweight, OB=Oral bioavailability, DL=Drug-likeness
Figure 3Protein-protein interaction network diagram of related targets of Rujiling capsule in the treatment of breast hyperplasia
Characteristic parameters of the major core target network
| Target | Degree | Betweenness centrality | Closeness centrality |
|---|---|---|---|
| TP53 | 64 | 0.149411244 | 0.707482993 |
| AKT1 | 59 | 0.08161137 | 0.670967742 |
| STAT3 | 50 | 0.045059144 | 0.626506024 |
| EGF | 49 | 0.03860266 | 0.619047619 |
| VEGFA | 48 | 0.027391709 | 0.615384615 |
| EGFR | 47 | 0.045472826 | 0.622754491 |
| INS | 46 | 0.046077056 | 0.611764706 |
| IL6 | 44 | 0.025935971 | 0.604651163 |
| MAPK8 | 44 | 0.036448057 | 0.615384615 |
| MAPK1 | 43 | 0.015968206 | 0.597701149 |
| CCND1 | 43 | 0.029565321 | 0.594285714 |
| JUN | 43 | 0.042270141 | 0.611764706 |
| MAPK3 | 42 | 0.014737757 | 0.594285714 |
| SRC | 42 | 0.018418615 | 0.594285714 |
| ESR1 | 39 | 0.034792202 | 0.587570621 |
| MYC | 38 | 0.009886295 | 0.577777778 |
| TNF | 37 | 0.007104548 | 0.571428571 |
| PTEN | 36 | 0.022126105 | 0.574585635 |
Figure 4Gene ontology enrichment analysis (the top 10 pathways)
Figure 5Analysis of Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes pathways (the top 20 pathways)
Binding energy between main active components and core targets
| Chemical composition | TP53 | AKT1 | STAT3 | EGF | VEGFA | EGFR | INS | IL6 | MAPK8 | MAPK1 | CCND1 | JUN | MAPK3 | SRC | ESR1 | MYC | TNF | PTEN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luteolin 1 | −4.3 | −0.6 | −7.8 | −7.6 | / | −3.4 | −5.2 | / | 10.7 | −0.5 | / | / | / | −8.5 | 7.3 | 31.1 | −8.0 | / |
| Kaempferol 2 | −7.7 | −4.6 | −7.6 | −6.6 | / | −4.8 | −3.1 | / | 3.2 | 1 | / | −7.6 | / | −9.0 | 10.5 | 36.8 | 32.8 | / |
| Quercetin 3 | −7.3 | −6 | −8.0 | −7.8 | / | −3.3 | −3.0 | / | 3.0 | 3.2 | / | 53.3 | / | −9.1 | 10.6 | 46.5 | 32.3 | / |
| Isoliquiritigenin 4 | −6.5 | −5.5 | −7.2 | −7.0 | / | −4.1 | −6.5 | / | 3.2 | −1.2 | / | −7.5 | / | −7.5 | 0.8 | 5.0 | 25.9 | / |
| Emodin 5 | −7.7 | −6.8 | −7.8 | −6.1 | / | −4.4 | 1.1 | / | 13.1 | −1.7 | / | −4.7 | / | −7.5 | 27.4 | 46.7 | 34.3 | / |
| Apigenin 6 | −7.3 | −6 | −7.7 | −7.3 | / | −5.4 | −5.4 | / | 6 | −1.3 | / | −7.5 | / | −8.8 | 7.8 | 29.8 | 31.8 | / |
"/ " Indicates that there is no binding energy between the corresponding active ingredient and the core target in the table
Figure 6The optimal composite structure of the key target and active ingredients