Literature DB >> 19410029

Ability of dGEMRIC and T2 mapping to evaluate cartilage repair after microfracture: a goat study.

A Watanabe1, C Boesch, S E Anderson, W Brehm, P Mainil Varlet.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the ability of delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC) and T2 mapping to evaluate the quality of repair tissue after microfracture.
DESIGN: Twelve knees from 12 goats were studied. An osteochondral defect (diameter, 6mm; depth, 3mm) with microfracture was created in the weight-bearing aspect of both the medial and lateral femoral condyles. Goats were euthanized at 24 weeks (n=6) and 48 weeks (n=6) postsurgery. Pre-contrast R1 (R1pre) and post-contrast R1 (R1post) measurements for dGEMRIC and a pre-contrast T2 measurement for T2 mapping were performed with a 3T MR imaging system. MR imaging findings were compared with histological and biochemical assessments.
RESULTS: In native cartilage, significant correlations were observed between the R1post and the glycosaminoglycan (GAG) concentration, as well as DeltaR1 (difference between the R1pre and R1post) and the GAG concentration (P<0.05). In repair tissue, a significant correlation was observed between DeltaR1 and the GAG concentration (P<0.05), but not between the R1post and the GAG concentration. In both repair tissue and native cartilage, no correlation was observed between T2 and the water concentration or between T2 and the hydroxyproline (HP) concentration. A zonal variation of T2 and a clear dependence of T2 on the angles relative to B0 were observed in native cartilage, but not in repair tissue.
CONCLUSION: dGEMRIC with DeltaR1 measurement might be useful for the evaluation of the GAG concentration in repair tissue after microfracture. T2 mapping might be useful for the differentiation of repair tissue after microfracture from native cartilage; however, its potential to assess the specific biochemical markers in native cartilage as well as repair tissue may be limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19410029     DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2009.03.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage        ISSN: 1063-4584            Impact factor:   6.576


  20 in total

1.  Longitudinal evaluation of cartilage repair tissue after microfracture using T2-mapping: a case report with arthroscopic and MRI correlation.

Authors:  José M Mejía Oneto; Jutta Ellermann; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  MR imaging assessment of articular cartilage repair procedures.

Authors:  Gregory Chang; Orrin Sherman; Guillaume Madelin; Michael Recht; Ravinder Regatte
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.266

3.  Augmenting the articular cartilage-implant interface: Functionalizing with a collagen adhesion protein.

Authors:  Aliza A Allon; Kenneth W Ng; Sommer Hammoud; Brooke H Russell; Casey M Jones; Jose J Rivera; Jeffrey Schwartz; Magnus Hook; Suzzane A Maher
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 4.396

4.  Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation of cartilage repair after microfracture treatment for full-thickness cartilage defect models in rabbit knee joints: correlations with histological findings.

Authors:  Hongyue Tao; Hong Li; Yinghui Hua; Zhongqing Chen; Xiaoyuan Feng; Shuang Chen
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  A synthetic cartilage extracellular matrix model: hyaluronan and collagen hydrogel relaxivity, impact of macromolecular concentration on dGEMRIC.

Authors:  Ediuska Laurens; Erika Schneider; Carl S Winalski; Anthony Calabro
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation of cartilage repair after microfracture (MF) treatment for adult unstable osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) in the ankle: correlations with clinical outcome.

Authors:  Hongyue Tao; Xiliang Shang; Rong Lu; Hong Li; Yinghui Hua; Xiaoyuan Feng; Shuang Chen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Normal T2 map profile of the entire femoral cartilage using an angle/layer-dependent approach.

Authors:  Yasuhito Kaneko; Taiki Nozaki; Hon Yu; Andrew Chang; Kayleigh Kaneshiro; Ran Schwarzkopf; Takeshi Hara; Hiroshi Yoshioka
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 8.  Rehabilitation and return-to-sports activity after debridement and bone marrow stimulation of osteochondral talar defects.

Authors:  Inge C M van Eekeren; Mikel L Reilingh; C Niek van Dijk
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Multimodal evaluation of tissue-engineered cartilage.

Authors:  Joseph M Mansour; Jean F Welter
Journal:  J Med Biol Eng       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 1.553

10.  [Defect models for the regeneration of articular cartilage in large animals].

Authors:  B Schneider-Wald; A K von Thaden; M L R Schwarz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.