Literature DB >> 25908914

Canadian cancer screening disparities: a recent historical perspective.

J Kerner1, J Liu1, K Wang1, S Fung1, C Landry1, G Lockwood1, L Zitzelsberger1, V Mai1.   

Abstract

Across Canada, introduction of the Pap test for cervical cancer screening, followed by mammography for breast cancer screening and, more recently, the fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening, has contributed to a reduction in cancer mortality. However, another contribution of screening has been disparities in cancer mortality between certain populations. Here, we explore the disparities associated with breast and cervical cancer screening and preliminary data concerning disparities in colorectal cancer screening. Although some disparities in screening utilization have been successfully reduced over time (for example, mammography and Pap test screening in rural and remote populations), screening utilization data for other populations (for example, low-income groups) clearly indicate that disparities have existed and continue to exist across Canada. Organized screening programs in Canada have been able to successfully engage 80% of women for regular cervical cancer screening and 70% of women for regular mammography screening, but of the women who remain to be reached or engaged in regular screening, those with the least resources, those who are the most isolated, and those who are least culturally integrated into Canadian society as a whole are over-represented. Population differences are also observed for utilization of colorectal cancer screening services. The research literature on interventions to promote screening utilization provides some evidence about what can be done to increase participation in organized screening by vulnerable populations. Adaption and adoption of evidence-based screening promotion interventions can increase the utilization of available screening services by populations that have experienced the greatest burden of disease with the least access to screening services.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer screening; cancer screening disparities

Year:  2015        PMID: 25908914      PMCID: PMC4399612          DOI: 10.3747/co.22.2539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN: 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


  37 in total

1.  Cancer screening - United States, 2010.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 17.586

2.  Development and evaluation of a culturally tailored educational video: changing breast cancer-related behaviors in Chinese women.

Authors:  Judy H Wang; Wenchi Liang; Marc D Schwartz; Marion M Lee; Barbara Kreling; Jeanne S Mandelblatt
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2007-06-29

3.  Effect of direct mail as a population-based strategy to increase mammography use among low-income underinsured women ages 40 to 64 years.

Authors:  Jonathan S Slater; George A Henly; Chung Nim Ha; Michael E Malone; John A Nyman; Sarah Diaz; Paul G McGovern
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Randomized controlled trial of mammography intervention in insured very low-income women.

Authors:  Nasar U Ahmed; Gillian Haber; Kofi A Semenya; Margaret K Hargreaves
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Colorectal cancer detection in a rural community. Development of a colonoscopy screening program.

Authors:  Mike Cotterill; Rudy Gasparelli; Erle Kirby
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of multiple outcalls to promote mammography among low-income women.

Authors:  L A Crane; T A Leakey; G Ehrsam; B K Rimer; R B Warnecke
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Promoting a breast cancer screening clinic for underserved women: a community collaboration.

Authors:  Sandhya Pruthi; Eugenia Shmidt; Margaret M Sherman; Lonzetta Neal; Dietlind Wahner-Roedler
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.847

8.  The Delta project: increasing breast cancer screening among rural minority and older women by targeting rural healthcare providers.

Authors:  Elizabeth Ann Coleman; Janet Lord; Jeanne Heard; Sharon Coon; Mary Cantrell; Carolyn Mohrmann; Patricia O'Sullivan
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  Randomized, controlled trial of a multimodal intervention to improve cancer screening rates in a safety-net primary care practice.

Authors:  Samantha Hendren; Paul Winters; Sharon Humiston; Amna Idris; Shirley X L Li; Patricia Ford; Raymond Specht; Stephen Marcus; Michael Mendoza; Kevin Fiscella
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  A multilevel intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening among community health center patients: results of a pilot study.

Authors:  Karen E Lasser; Jennifer Murillo; Elizabeth Medlin; Sandra Lisboa; Lisa Valley-Shah; Robert H Fletcher; Karen M Emmons; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 2.497

View more
  16 in total

1.  Testing e-mail content to encourage physicians to access an audit and feedback tool: a factorial randomized experiment.

Authors:  G Vaisson; H O Witteman; S Chipenda-Dansokho; M Saragosa; Z Bouck; C A Bravo; L Desveaux; D Llovet; J Presseau; M Taljaard; S Umar; J M Grimshaw; J Tinmouth; N M Ivers
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Access to cancer care in northwestern Ontario-a population-based study using administrative data.

Authors:  M Febbraro; M Conlon; J Caswell; N Laferriere
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Differences in colorectal cancer screening rates across income strata by levels of urbanization: results from the Canadian Community Health Survey (2013/2014).

Authors:  Jonathan Simkin; Gina Ogilvie; Brendan Hanley; Catherine Elliott
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2018-10-23

4.  Genetic testing in families with hereditary colorectal cancer in British Columbia and Yukon: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Vivienne K Beard; Angela C Bedard; Jennifer Nuk; Petra W C Lee; Quan Hong; James E J Bedard; Sophie Sun; Kasmintan A Schrader
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2020-10-19

5.  Brain cancer survival in Canada 1996-2008: effects of sociodemographic characteristics.

Authors:  E V Walker; J Ross; Y Yuan; T R Smith; F G Davis
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  Decline in Cancer Screening in Vulnerable Populations? Results of the EDIFICE Surveys.

Authors:  Jean-François Morère; François Eisinger; Chantal Touboul; Christine Lhomel; Sébastien Couraud; Jérôme Viguier
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 7.  Inequities in genetic testing for hereditary breast cancer: implications for public health practice.

Authors:  Ambreen Sayani
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2018-05-20

8.  Socioeconomic inequalities in colorectal cancer incidence in Canada: trends over two decades.

Authors:  Mohammad Hajizadeh; Marie Charles; Grace M Johnston; Robin Urquhart
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 2.506

9.  Enhancing access to cervical and colorectal cancer screening for women in rural and remote northern Alberta: a pilot study.

Authors:  Silvina C Mema; Huiming Yang; Sherry Elnitsky; Zhichang Jiang; Marcus Vaska; Linan Xu
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2017-10-03

10.  Sociodemographic characteristics of women with invasive cervical cancer in British Columbia, 2004-2013: a descriptive study.

Authors:  Jonathan Simkin; Laurie Smith; Dirk van Niekerk; Hannah Caird; Tania Dearden; Kimberly van der Hoek; Nadine R Caron; Ryan R Woods; Stuart Peacock; Gina Ogilvie
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2021-04-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.