Literature DB >> 32669933

Access to cancer care in northwestern Ontario-a population-based study using administrative data.

M Febbraro1, M Conlon2, J Caswell2, N Laferriere3.   

Abstract

Background: Despite universal access to health care in Canada, there are disparities relating to social determinants of health that contribute to discrepancies between rural and urban areas in cancer incidence and outcomes. Given that Canada has one of the highest-quality national population-based cancer registry systems in the world and that little information is available about cancer statistics specific to northwestern Ontario, the purpose of the present study was to estimate the percentage of cancer patients without documentation of a specialist consultation (medical or radiation oncology consultation) and to determine factors that affect access to specialist consultation in northwestern Ontario.
Methods: This population-based retrospective study used administrative data obtained through the Ontario Cancer Data Linkage Project. For each index case, a timeline was constructed of all Ontario Health Insurance Plan billing codes and associated service dates, starting with the primary cancer diagnosis and ending with death. Specific factors affecting access to specialist consultation were assessed.
Results: Within the 6-year study period (2010-2016), 2583 index cases were identified. Most (n = 2007, 78%) received a specialist consultation. Factors associated with not receiving a specialist consultation included older age [p < 0.0001; odds ratio (or): 0.29; 95% confidence interval (ci): 0.19 to 0.44] and rural residence (p < 0.0001; or: 0.48; 95% ci: 0.48 to 0.72). Factors associated with receiving a specialist consultation included a longer timeline (p < 0.0001; or: 1.32; 95% ci: 1.19 to 1.46), a diagnosis of breast cancer (p < 0.0001; or: 2.51; 95% ci: 1.43 to 4.42), and a diagnosis of lung cancer (p < 0.0001; or: 1.77; 95% ci: 1.38 to 2.26). Conclusions: This study is the first to look at care access in northwestern Ontario. The complexity and multidisciplinary nature of cancer care makes the provision of appropriate care a challenge; a one-size-fits-all disease prevention and treatment strategy might not be appropriate. 2020 Multimed Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health services accessibility; North West lhin; cancer care access; medical oncology consultation; radiation oncology consultation; rural cancer services

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32669933      PMCID: PMC7339835          DOI: 10.3747/co.27.5717

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN: 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


  17 in total

1.  Canadian cancer screening disparities: a recent historical perspective.

Authors:  J Kerner; J Liu; K Wang; S Fung; C Landry; G Lockwood; L Zitzelsberger; V Mai
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Rural-urban disparities in incidence and outcomes of neuroendocrine tumors: A population-based analysis of 6271 cases.

Authors:  Julie Hallet; Calvin H L Law; Paul J Karanicolas; Refik Saskin; Ning Liu; Simron Singh
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Association of the Social Determinants of Health With Quality of Primary Care.

Authors:  Alan Katz; Dan Chateau; Jennifer E Enns; Jeff Valdivia; Carole Taylor; Randy Walld; Scott McCulloch
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  Unmet supportive care needs of haematological cancer survivors: rural versus urban residents.

Authors:  Flora Tzelepis; Christine L Paul; Robert W Sanson-Fisher; H Sharon Campbell; Kenneth Bradstock; Mariko L Carey; Anna Williamson
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 3.673

Review 5.  Disparities in breast cancer stage at diagnosis in urban and rural adult women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sallyanne Nguyen-Pham; Janni Leung; Deirdre McLaughlin
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 3.797

6.  Demographic differences between cancer survivors and those who die quickly of their disease.

Authors:  P A Groome; K M Schulze; S Keller; W J Mackillop
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 4.126

7.  Inequity in access to guideline-recommended colorectal cancer treatment in Nova Scotia, Canada.

Authors:  André R Maddison; Yukiko Asada; Robin Urquhart; Grace Johnston; Frederick Burge; Geoff Porter
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2012-11

8.  Referral patterns, treatment choices, and outcomes in locoregional esophageal cancer: a population-based analysis of elderly patients.

Authors:  Ewout W Steyerberg; Bridget Neville; Jane C Weeks; Craig C Earle
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-06-10       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Who does not receive treatment for cancer?

Authors:  Marcia M Ward; Fred Ullrich; Kevin Matthews; Gerard Rushton; Michael A Goldstein; Dean F Bajorin; Amy Hanley; Charles F Lynch
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 10.  Chronic disease patients' experiences with accessing health care in rural and remote areas: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.

Authors:  F Brundisini; M Giacomini; D DeJean; M Vanstone; S Winsor; A Smith
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2013-09-01
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Pursuing Connectivity in Cardio-Oncology Care-The Future of Telemedicine and Artificial Intelligence in Providing Equity and Access to Rural Communities.

Authors:  Coralea Kappel; Moira Rushton-Marovac; Darryl Leong; Susan Dent
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-06-13

2.  The Impact of Virtual Cancer Care on Chemotherapy Delivery and Clinical Outcomes in Colorectal Cancer Patients Receiving Systemic Therapy: A Pre- and Intra-Pandemic Analysis.

Authors:  William J Phillips; Macyn Leung; Kednapa Thavorn; Timothy R Asmis
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 3.109

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.