Literature DB >> 11008910

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of multiple outcalls to promote mammography among low-income women.

L A Crane1, T A Leakey, G Ehrsam, B K Rimer, R B Warnecke.   

Abstract

A multiple outcall approach based on the Transtheoretical Model was used to encourage mammography behavior in low-income women in the state of Colorado. Women (n = 983) were recruited in person at grocery and discount stores and were then called over the telephone to receive the multiple outcall intervention. These women were compared with 3,080 women who were recruited by telephone and randomly assigned to three study groups: health survey only (control); single outcall; or advance card + single outcall. Subsequent mammography behavior was assessed through a telephone interview conducted 6 months after initiation of the protocol. After controlling for baseline differences between groups in age, education, income, health status, and previous mammography behavior, the multiple outcall intervention was significantly related to mammography behavior among women nonadherent at baseline (odds ratio, 2.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.45-4.60). Furthermore, women who received the multiple outcall intervention had higher "stage of change" at follow-up and more positive attitudes toward mammography. Cost-effectiveness analysis indicated that although the multiple outcall intervention was more costly to deliver ($14.84 per subject compared with about $7.00 for the single outcall interventions), it cost considerably less per subject converted from nonadherent to adherent. Despite study design limitations, the multiple outcall intervention appears to be an effective method of promoting mammography among previously nonadherent women. The results suggest that a combined approach, in which nonadherent women receive multiple calls promoting screening behavior, followed by single calls at the appropriate intervals to promote repeat screening, may be a useful strategy in defined populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11008910

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  14 in total

1.  Canadian cancer screening disparities: a recent historical perspective.

Authors:  J Kerner; J Liu; K Wang; S Fung; C Landry; G Lockwood; L Zitzelsberger; V Mai
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Cost-effectiveness of targeted versus tailored interventions to promote mammography screening among women military veterans in the United States.

Authors:  David R Lairson; Wen Chan; Yu-Chia Chang; Deborah J del Junco; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Eval Program Plann       Date:  2010-08-06

3.  Tailored Behavioral Intervention Among Blacks With Metabolic Syndrome and Sleep Apnea: Results of the MetSO Trial.

Authors:  Girardin Jean-Louis; Valerie Newsome; Natasha J Williams; Ferdinand Zizi; Joseph Ravenell; Gbenga Ogedegbe
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 5.849

4.  Eliminating disparities in cancer screening and follow-up of abnormal results: what will it take?

Authors:  Kevin Fiscella; Sharon Humiston; Samantha Hendren; Paul Winters; Pascal Jean-Pierre; Amna Idris; Patricia Ford
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2011-02

5.  Staffing time required to increase cancer-screening rates through telephone support.

Authors:  Christina M Robinson; Michael L Beach; Mary Ann Greene; Andrea Cassells; Jonathan N Tobin; Allen J Dietrich
Journal:  J Ambul Care Manage       Date:  2010 Apr-Jun

6.  Evaluating a tailored intervention to increase screening mammography in an urban area.

Authors:  Bruce Allen; Shahrzad Bazargan-Hejazi
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.798

7.  A randomized controlled trial to increase cancer screening among attendees of community health centers.

Authors:  Richard G Roetzheim; Lisa K Christman; Paul B Jacobsen; Alan B Cantor; Jennifer Schroeder; Rania Abdulla; Seft Hunter; Thomas N Chirikos; Jeffrey P Krischer
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

8.  A randomized trial of a tailored barriers intervention for Cancer Information Service (CIS) callers in pain.

Authors:  Sandra E Ward; Ko Kung Wang; Ronald C Serlin; Shelly L Peterson; Mary Ellen Murray
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  Tailored interventions to promote mammography screening: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Stephanie J Sohl; Anne Moyer
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2007-06-23       Impact factor: 4.018

10.  Developing and evaluating an individually tailored intervention to increase mammography adherence among Chinese American women.

Authors:  Tsu-Yin Wu; Chiuman Lin
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.592

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.