Literature DB >> 25904742

A technology platform to assess multiple cancer agents simultaneously within a patient's tumor.

S Bahram Bahrami1, Beryl A Hatton2, Richard A Klinghoffer2, Jason P Frazier2, Alicia Moreno-Gonzalez2, Andrew D Strand1, William S Kerwin2, Joseph R Casalini2, Derek J Thirstrup2, Sheng You2, Shelli M Morris2, Korashon L Watts2, Mandana Veiseh1, Marc O Grenley2, Ilona Tretyak2, Joyoti Dey2, Michael Carleton2, Emily Beirne2, Kyle D Pedro1, Sally H Ditzler2, Emily J Girard1, Thomas L Deckwerth2, Jessica A Bertout2, Karri A Meleo3, Ellen H Filvaroff4, Rajesh Chopra5, Oliver W Press1, James M Olson1,6,7.   

Abstract

A fundamental problem in cancer drug development is that antitumor efficacy in preclinical cancer models does not translate faithfully to patient outcomes. Much of early cancer drug discovery is performed under in vitro conditions in cell-based models that poorly represent actual malignancies. To address this inconsistency, we have developed a technology platform called CIVO, which enables simultaneous assessment of up to eight drugs or drug combinations within a single solid tumor in vivo. The platform is currently designed for use in animal models of cancer and patients with superficial tumors but can be modified for investigation of deeper-seated malignancies. In xenograft lymphoma models, CIVO microinjection of well-characterized anticancer agents (vincristine, doxorubicin, mafosfamide, and prednisolone) induced spatially defined cellular changes around sites of drug exposure, specific to the known mechanisms of action of each drug. The observed localized responses predicted responses to systemically delivered drugs in animals. In pair-matched lymphoma models, CIVO correctly demonstrated tumor resistance to doxorubicin and vincristine and an unexpected enhanced sensitivity to mafosfamide in multidrug-resistant lymphomas compared with chemotherapy-naïve lymphomas. A CIVO-enabled in vivo screen of 97 approved oncology agents revealed a novel mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) pathway inhibitor that exhibits significantly increased tumor-killing activity in the drug-resistant setting compared with chemotherapy-naïve tumors. Finally, feasibility studies to assess the use of CIVO in human and canine patients demonstrated that microinjection of drugs is toxicity-sparing while inducing robust, easily tracked, drug-specific responses in autochthonous tumors, setting the stage for further application of this technology in clinical trials.
Copyright © 2015, American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25904742      PMCID: PMC4770902          DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa7489

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Transl Med        ISSN: 1946-6234            Impact factor:   17.956


  32 in total

1.  Validating clustering for gene expression data.

Authors:  K Y Yeung; D R Haynor; W L Ruzzo
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Genetic bottlenecks and the hazardous game of population reduction in cell line based research.

Authors:  David Gisselsson; David Lindgren; Linda Holmquist Mengelbier; Ingrid Øra; Herman Yeger
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 3.905

3.  In vivo monitoring response to chemotherapy of human diffuse large B-cell lymphoma xenografts in SCID mice by 1H and 31P MRS.

Authors:  Ming Q Huang; David S Nelson; Stephen Pickup; Hui Qiao; E James Delikatny; Harish Poptani; Jerry D Glickson
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Assessment of chemotherapy-induced DNA damage in peripheral blood leukocytes of cancer patients using the alkaline comet assay.

Authors:  Nevenka Kopjar; Vera Garaj-Vrhovac; Ivan Milas
Journal:  Teratog Carcinog Mutagen       Date:  2002

5.  DNA damage and repair in peripheral blood lymphocytes from healthy individuals and cancer patients: a pilot study on the implications in the clinical response to chemotherapy.

Authors:  Silvina Beatriz Nadin; Laura M Vargas-Roig; Gisela Drago; Jorge Ibarra; Daniel R Ciocca
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 6.  Impact of microdosing clinical study -- why necessary and how useful?

Authors:  Yuichi Sugiyama; Shinji Yamashita
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 15.470

7.  Antitumor efficacy testing in rodents.

Authors:  Melinda G Hollingshead
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 8.  ABC multidrug transporters: structure, function and role in chemoresistance.

Authors:  Frances J Sharom
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.533

9.  Predictive value of the fluorescent cytoprint assay (FCA): a retrospective correlation study of in vitro chemosensitivity and individual responses to chemotherapy.

Authors:  L A Leone; P A Meitner; T J Myers; W R Grace; W H Gajewski; H J Fingert; B Rotman
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.176

Review 10.  Prediction of individual response to anticancer therapy: historical and future perspectives.

Authors:  Florian T Unger; Irene Witte; Kerstin A David
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 9.261

View more
  36 in total

1.  Drug delivery: Get in there!

Authors:  M Teresa Villanueva
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  Tracking tumor radiotherapy response in vivo with Cherenkov-excited luminescence ink imaging.

Authors:  Jennifer A Soter; Ethan P M LaRochelle; Brook K Byrd; Irwin I Tendler; Jason R Gunn; Boyu Meng; Rendy R Strawbridge; Dennis J Wirth; Scott C Davis; David J Gladstone; Lesley A Jarvis; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  A microfluidic platform for functional testing of cancer drugs on intact tumor slices.

Authors:  A D Rodriguez; L F Horowitz; K Castro; H Kenerson; N Bhattacharjee; G Gandhe; A Raman; R J Monnat; R Yeung; R C Rostomily; A Folch
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 6.799

4.  Multidrug Analyses in Patients Distinguish Efficacious Cancer Agents Based on Both Tumor Cell Killing and Immunomodulation.

Authors:  Jason P Frazier; Jessica A Bertout; William S Kerwin; Alicia Moreno-Gonzalez; Joey R Casalini; Marc O Grenley; Emily Beirne; Kori L Watts; Andy Keener; Derek J Thirstrup; Ilona Tretyak; Sally H Ditzler; Chelsea D Tripp; Kevin Choy; Sarah Gillings; Megan N Breit; Karri A Meleo; Vanessa Rizzo; Chamisa L Herrera; James A Perry; Ravi K Amaravadi; James M Olson; Richard A Klinghoffer
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 5.  Translation of combination nanodrugs into nanomedicines: lessons learned and future outlook.

Authors:  Qingxin Mu; Jesse Yu; Lisa A McConnachie; John C Kraft; Yu Gao; Gaurav K Gulati; Rodney J Y Ho
Journal:  J Drug Target       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 5.121

Review 6.  Molecular and Functional Diagnostic Tools in Precision Oncology for Urological Malignancies.

Authors:  Vasanthakumar Sekar; Debapriya Ghosh Mehrotra; Biswanath Majumder
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-12-15

7.  In vivo detection of drug-induced apoptosis in tumors using Raman spectroscopy.

Authors:  Oliver Jonas; Jeon Woong Kang; Surya P Singh; Alex Lammers; Freddy T Nguyen; Ramachandra R Dasari; Peter T C So; Robert Langer; Michael J Cima
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 4.616

8.  An in vivo multiplexed small-molecule screening platform.

Authors:  Barbara M Grüner; Christopher J Schulze; Dian Yang; Daisuke Ogasawara; Melissa M Dix; Zoë N Rogers; Chen-Hua Chuang; Christopher D McFarland; Shin-Heng Chiou; J Mark Brown; Benjamin F Cravatt; Matthew Bogyo; Monte M Winslow
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 28.547

9.  Functional precision cancer medicine-moving beyond pure genomics.

Authors:  Anthony Letai
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 53.440

10.  Combination Cancer Therapy Can Confer Benefit via Patient-to-Patient Variability without Drug Additivity or Synergy.

Authors:  Adam C Palmer; Peter K Sorger
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 41.582

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.