Literature DB >> 32135522

Tracking tumor radiotherapy response in vivo with Cherenkov-excited luminescence ink imaging.

Jennifer A Soter1, Ethan P M LaRochelle, Brook K Byrd, Irwin I Tendler, Jason R Gunn, Boyu Meng, Rendy R Strawbridge, Dennis J Wirth, Scott C Davis, David J Gladstone, Lesley A Jarvis, Brian W Pogue.   

Abstract

This study demonstrates remote imaging for in vivo detection of radiation-induced tumor microstructural changes by tracking the diffusive spread of injected intratumor UV excited tattoo ink using Cherenkov-excited luminescence imaging (CELI). Micro-liter quantities of luminescent tattoo ink with UV absorption and visible emission were injected at a depth of 2 mm into mouse tumors prior to receiving a high dose treatment of radiation. X-rays from a clinical linear accelerator were used to excite phosphorescent compounds within the tattoo ink through Cherenkov emission. The in vivo phosphorescence was detected using a time-gated intensified CMOS camera immediately after injection, and then again at varying time points after the ink had broken down with the apoptotic tumor cells. Ex vivo tumors were imaged post-mortem using hyperspectral cryo-fluorescence imaging to quantify necrosis and compared to Cherenkov-excited light imaging of diffusive ink spread measured in vivo. Imaging of untreated control mice showed that ink distributions remained constant after four days with less than 3% diffusive spread measured using full width at 20% max. For all mice, in vivo CELI measurements matched within 12% of the values estimated by the high-resolution ex vivo sliced luminescence imaging of the tumors. The tattoo ink spread in treated mice was found to correlate well with the nonperfusion necrotic core volume (R2 = 0.92) but not well with total tumor volume changes (R2 = 0.34). In vivo and ex vivo findings indicate that the diffusive spread of the injected tattoo ink can be related to radiation-induced necrosis, independent of total tumor volume change. Tracking the diffusive spread of the ink allows for distinguishing between an increase in tumor size due to new cellular growth and an increase in tumor size due to edema. Furthermore, the imaging resolution of CELI allows for in vivo tracking of subtle microenvironmental changes which occur earlier than tumor shrinkage and this offers the potential for novel, minimally invasive radiotherapy response assay without interrupting a singular clinical workflow.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32135522      PMCID: PMC7190437          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab7d16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  31 in total

Review 1.  Imaging radiation response in tumor and normal tissue.

Authors:  Marjan Rafat; Rehan Ali; Edward E Graves
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-06-15

Review 2.  Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging: a biomarker for treatment response in oncology.

Authors:  Daniel A Hamstra; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Brian D Ross
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-09-10       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Cherenkov-excited luminescence scanned imaging.

Authors:  Rongxiao Zhang; Alisha V D'souza; Jason R Gunn; Tatiana V Esipova; Sergei A Vinogradov; Adam K Glaser; Lesley A Jarvis; David J Gladstone; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 3.776

4.  A visible response to an invisible tattoo.

Authors:  Matthew Tsang; Amanda Marsch; Katrina Bassett; Whitney High; James Fitzpatrick; Lori Prok
Journal:  J Cutan Pathol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.587

5.  Multidrug Analyses in Patients Distinguish Efficacious Cancer Agents Based on Both Tumor Cell Killing and Immunomodulation.

Authors:  Jason P Frazier; Jessica A Bertout; William S Kerwin; Alicia Moreno-Gonzalez; Joey R Casalini; Marc O Grenley; Emily Beirne; Kori L Watts; Andy Keener; Derek J Thirstrup; Ilona Tretyak; Sally H Ditzler; Chelsea D Tripp; Kevin Choy; Sarah Gillings; Megan N Breit; Karri A Meleo; Vanessa Rizzo; Chamisa L Herrera; James A Perry; Ravi K Amaravadi; James M Olson; Richard A Klinghoffer
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Tattoo inks contain polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons that additionally generate deleterious singlet oxygen.

Authors:  Johannes Regensburger; Karin Lehner; Tim Maisch; Rudolf Vasold; Francesco Santarelli; Eva Engel; Anita Gollmer; Burkhard König; Michael Landthaler; Wolfgang Bäumler
Journal:  Exp Dermatol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.960

7.  Current standards for response evaluation by imaging techniques.

Authors:  S J Gwyther
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 8.  Diffusion MRI in early cancer therapeutic response assessment.

Authors:  C J Galbán; B A Hoff; T L Chenevert; B D Ross
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 9.  Functional imaging for radiation treatment planning, response assessment, and adaptive therapy in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Priya Bhatnagar; Manil Subesinghe; Chirag Patel; Robin Prestwich; Andrew F Scarsbrook
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

10.  Characterization of radiation sensitivity of human squamous carcinoma A431 cells.

Authors:  C E Ng; P C Keng; R M Sutherland
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  4 in total

1.  Maternally transferred mAbs protect neonatal mice from HSV-induced mortality and morbidity.

Authors:  Iara M Backes; Brook K Byrd; Matthew D Slein; Chaya D Patel; Sean A Taylor; Callaghan R Garland; Scott W MacDonald; Alejandro B Balazs; Scott C Davis; Margaret E Ackerman; David A Leib
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 17.579

2.  Heterogeneity of circulating tumor cell dissemination and lung metastases in a subcutaneous Lewis lung carcinoma model.

Authors:  Jessica E Fitzgerald; Brook K Byrd; Roshani A Patil; Rendall R Strawbridge; Scott C Davis; Chiara Bellini; Mark Niedre
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Light flashes during proton and photon radiotherapy: A multicenter prospective observational study.

Authors:  Masashi Mizumoto; Yoshiko Oshiro; Toshio Miyamoto; Taisuke Sumiya; Motohiro Murakami; Keiichiro Baba; Shosei Shimizu; Takashi Iizumi; Haruko Numajiri; Kei Nakai; Toshiyuki Okumura; Kazushi Maruo; Takeji Sakae; Hideyuki Sakurai
Journal:  Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-11-24

4.  Light flash and odor during proton beam therapy for pediatric patients: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Masashi Mizumoto; Yoshiko Oshiro; Toshio Miyamoto; Taisuke Sumiya; Keiichiro Baba; Motohiro Murakami; Shosei Shimizu; Takashi Iizumi; Takashi Saito; Hirokazu Makishima; Haruko Numajiri; Kei Nakai; Toshiyuki Okumura; Kazushi Maruo; Takeji Sakae; Hideyuki Sakurai
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 5.738

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.