Literature DB >> 16143448

DNA damage and repair in peripheral blood lymphocytes from healthy individuals and cancer patients: a pilot study on the implications in the clinical response to chemotherapy.

Silvina Beatriz Nadin1, Laura M Vargas-Roig, Gisela Drago, Jorge Ibarra, Daniel R Ciocca.   

Abstract

Drug resistance is considered the main impediment to successful cancer chemotherapy. The quest for a method useful to predict individual responses to chemotherapy prior to treatment is highly desired. This study was designed to determine the individual influences of doxorubicin and cisplatin on the degree of DNA damage, DNA repair and hMSH2 and the hMLH1 protein expression in peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) and their correlations with the clinical response. PBL were obtained from 25 cancer patients (pre- and post-chemotherapy) and from 10 healthy persons, cultured and exposed to doxorubicin or cisplatin. Cells were collected at T0 (immediately after drug treatment) and 24h after damage (T24). The alkaline comet assay was employed to assess the DNA damage and repair function, and immunocytochemistry to study hMLH1 and hMSH2 expression. Clinical response was evaluated after three cycles of chemotherapy. Pre-chemotherapy PBL from cancer patients showed significantly higher levels of basal DNA damage than healthy persons, with appreciable interindividual variations between them. The in vivo administration of antineoplasic drugs was accompanied by significant DNA damage, and an increased in the number of apoptotic cells. Cancer patients with complete response showed a high number of apoptotic cells. The DNA migration increased at T0 and at T24 in cisplatin-treated patients, reflecting a decreased rate of cisplatin adducts repair than that observed in healthy individuals. The ability to repair DNA lesions in doxorubicin-damaged cells was very similar between healthy individuals and cancer patients. Cisplatin-treated patients that died by the disease showed lower DNA migration than the mean value. The expression of hMLH1 and hMSH2 was practically identical between healthy individuals and cancer patients. Nevertheless, chemotherapy induced a depletion mostly of hMLH1. In 83% of cisplatin-treated patients with CR the hMLH1 and hMSH2 expression at T24 was higher than the mean. In this pilot study the alkaline comet assay offered information about the amount of DNA damage and the DNA repair status in PBL from individual patients and this seems useful in predicting the response to chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16143448     DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2005.07.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Lett        ISSN: 0304-3835            Impact factor:   8.679


  20 in total

Review 1.  Candidate mechanisms for chemotherapy-induced cognitive changes.

Authors:  Tim A Ahles; Andrew J Saykin
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 2.  Chemobrain: a critical review and causal hypothesis of link between cytokines and epigenetic reprogramming associated with chemotherapy.

Authors:  Xiao-Min Wang; Brian Walitt; Leorey Saligan; Agnes F Y Tiwari; Chi Wai Cheung; Zhang-Jin Zhang
Journal:  Cytokine       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 3.861

Review 3.  Cognitive Effects of Chemotherapy and Cancer-Related Treatments in Older Adults.

Authors:  Jennifer N Vega; Julie Dumas; Paul A Newhouse
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 4.105

Review 4.  Heat shock proteins and DNA repair mechanisms: an updated overview.

Authors:  Mayra L Sottile; Silvina B Nadin
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 3.667

5.  Neuropsychological disorders in non-central nervous system cancer: a review of objective cognitive impairment, depression, and related rehabilitation options.

Authors:  Fulvia Di Iulio; Luca Cravello; Jacob Shofany; Stefano Paolucci; Carlo Caltagirone; Giovanni Morone
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 6.  Cognitive Impairment Associated with Cancer: A Brief Review.

Authors:  J Cara Pendergrass; Steven D Targum; John E Harrison
Journal:  Innov Clin Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-01

Review 7.  Small-molecule inhibitors of proteins involved in base excision repair potentiate the anti-tumorigenic effect of existing chemotherapeutics and irradiation.

Authors:  April M Reed; Melissa L Fishel; Mark R Kelley
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.404

8.  Amifostine (WR2721) confers DNA protection to in vivo cisplatin-treated murine peripheral blood leukocytes.

Authors:  E A Prieto González; A G Fuchs; González S Sánchez
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 2.658

9.  A technology platform to assess multiple cancer agents simultaneously within a patient's tumor.

Authors:  S Bahram Bahrami; Beryl A Hatton; Richard A Klinghoffer; Jason P Frazier; Alicia Moreno-Gonzalez; Andrew D Strand; William S Kerwin; Joseph R Casalini; Derek J Thirstrup; Sheng You; Shelli M Morris; Korashon L Watts; Mandana Veiseh; Marc O Grenley; Ilona Tretyak; Joyoti Dey; Michael Carleton; Emily Beirne; Kyle D Pedro; Sally H Ditzler; Emily J Girard; Thomas L Deckwerth; Jessica A Bertout; Karri A Meleo; Ellen H Filvaroff; Rajesh Chopra; Oliver W Press; James M Olson
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 17.956

10.  Genetic variation and its role in malignancy.

Authors:  Bente A Talseth-Palmer; Rodney J Scott
Journal:  Int J Biomed Sci       Date:  2011-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.