Literature DB >> 25897475

Automated Quantitative Plaque Burden from Coronary CT Angiography Noninvasively Predicts Hemodynamic Significance by using Fractional Flow Reserve in Intermediate Coronary Lesions.

Mariana Diaz-Zamudio1, Damini Dey1, Annika Schuhbaeck1, Ryo Nakazato1, Heidi Gransar1, Piotr J Slomka1, Jagat Narula1, Daniel S Berman1, Stephan Achenbach1, James K Min1, Joon-Hyung Doh1, Bon-Kwon Koo1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility of multiple automated plaque measurements from coronary computed tomographic (CT) angiography in determining hemodynamic significance by using invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) in patients with intermediate coronary stenosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the institutional review board. All patients provided written informed consent. Fifty-six intermediate lesions (with 30%-69% diameter stenosis) in 56 consecutive patients (mean age, 62 years; range, 46-88 years), who subsequently underwent invasive coronary angiography with assessment of FFR (values ≤0.80 were considered hemodynamically significant) were analyzed at coronary CT angiography. Coronary CT angiography images were quantitatively analyzed with automated software to obtain the following measurements: volume and burden (plaque volume × 100 per vessel volume) of total, calcified, and noncalcified plaque; low-attenuation (<30 HU) noncalcified plaque; diameter stenosis; remodeling index; contrast attenuation difference (maximum percent difference in attenuation per unit area with respect to the proximal reference cross section); and lesion length. Logistic regression adjusted for potential confounding factors, receiver operating characteristics, and integrated discrimination improvement were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: FFR was 0.80 or less in 21 (38%) of the 56 lesions. Compared with nonischemic lesions, ischemic lesions had greater diameter stenosis (65% vs 52%, P = .02) and total (49% vs 37%, P = .0003), noncalcified (44% vs 33%, P = .0004), and low-attenuation noncalcified (9% vs 4%, P < .0001) plaque burden. Calcified plaque and remodeling index were not significantly different. In multivariable analysis, only total, noncalcified, and low-attenuation noncalcified plaque burden were significant predictors of ischemia (P < .015). For predicting ischemia, the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.83 for total plaque burden versus 0.68 for stenosis (P = .04).
CONCLUSION: Compared with stenosis grading, automatic quantification of total, noncalcified, and low-attenuation noncalcified plaque burden substantially improves determination of lesion-specific hemodynamic significance by FFR in patients with intermediate coronary lesions. © RSNA, 2015.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25897475      PMCID: PMC4578161          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015141648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  35 in total

1.  Is a myocardial infarction more likely to result from a mild coronary lesion or an ischemia-producing one?

Authors:  William F Fearon
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 6.546

2.  Interpreting incremental value of markers added to risk prediction models.

Authors:  Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino; Karol M Pencina; A Cecile J W Janssens; Philip Greenland
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Vulnerable plaque features on coronary CT angiography as markers of inducible regional myocardial hypoperfusion from severe coronary artery stenoses.

Authors:  Haim Shmilovich; Victor Y Cheng; Balaji K Tamarappoo; Damini Dey; Ryo Nakazato; Heidi Gransar; Louise E J Thomson; Sean W Hayes; John D Friedman; Guido Germano; Piotr J Slomka; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2011-08-07       Impact factor: 5.162

4.  Transluminal attenuation gradient in coronary computed tomography angiography is a novel noninvasive approach to the identification of functionally significant coronary artery stenosis: a comparison with fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Dennis T L Wong; Brian S Ko; James D Cameron; Nitesh Nerlekar; Michael C H Leung; Yuvaraj Malaiapan; Marcus Crossett; Darryl P Leong; Stephen G Worthley; John Troupis; Ian T Meredith; Sujith K Seneviratne
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Quantitative relationship between the extent and morphology of coronary atherosclerotic plaque and downstream myocardial perfusion.

Authors:  Masanao Naya; Venkatesh L Murthy; Ron Blankstein; Arkadiusz Sitek; Jon Hainer; Courtney Foster; Mariya Gaber; Jolene M Fantony; Sharmila Dorbala; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Histopathologic characteristics of atherosclerotic coronary disease and implications of the findings for the invasive and noninvasive detection of vulnerable plaques.

Authors:  Jagat Narula; Masataka Nakano; Renu Virmani; Frank D Kolodgie; Rita Petersen; Robert Newcomb; Shaista Malik; Valentin Fuster; Aloke V Finn
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Prospective, head-to-head comparison of quantitative coronary angiography, quantitative computed tomography angiography, and intravascular ultrasound for the prediction of hemodynamic significance in intermediate and severe lesions, using fractional flow reserve as reference standard (from the ATLANTA I and II Study).

Authors:  Szilard Voros; Sarah Rinehart; Jesus G Vazquez-Figueroa; Anna Kalynych; Dimitri Karmpaliotis; Zhen Qian; Parag H Joshi; Hunt Anderson; Laura Murrieta; Charles Wilmer; Harold Carlson; William Ballard; Charles Brown
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Aggregate plaque volume by coronary computed tomography angiography is superior and incremental to luminal narrowing for diagnosis of ischemic lesions of intermediate stenosis severity.

Authors:  Ryo Nakazato; Aryeh Shalev; Joon-Hyung Doh; Bon-Kwon Koo; Heidi Gransar; Millie J Gomez; Jonathon Leipsic; Hyung-Bok Park; Daniel S Berman; James K Min
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 9.  Computational fluid dynamics applied to cardiac computed tomography for noninvasive quantification of fractional flow reserve: scientific basis.

Authors:  Charles A Taylor; Timothy A Fonte; James K Min
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography angiography for coronary lesions of intermediate stenosis severity: results from the DeFACTO study.

Authors:  Ryo Nakazato; Hyung-Bok Park; Daniel S Berman; Heidi Gransar; Bon-Kwon Koo; Andrejs Erglis; Fay Y Lin; Allison M Dunning; Matthew J Budoff; Jennifer Malpeso; Jonathon Leipsic; James K Min
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 7.792

View more
  19 in total

1.  Relationship Between Quantitative Adverse Plaque Features From Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography and Downstream Impaired Myocardial Flow Reserve by 13N-Ammonia Positron Emission Tomography: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Damini Dey; Mariana Diaz Zamudio; Annika Schuhbaeck; Luis Eduardo Juarez Orozco; Yuka Otaki; Heidi Gransar; Debiao Li; Guido Germano; Stephan Achenbach; Daniel S Berman; Aloha Meave; Erick Alexanderson; Piotr J Slomka
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 7.792

2.  Hybrid quantitative imaging: Will it enter clinical practice?

Authors:  Piotr Slomka
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  A systematic review of imaging anatomy in predicting functional significance of coronary stenoses determined by fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Miao Chu; Neng Dai; Junqing Yang; Jelmer Westra; Shengxian Tu
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 4.  Cardiac imaging: working towards fully-automated machine analysis & interpretation.

Authors:  Piotr J Slomka; Damini Dey; Arkadiusz Sitek; Manish Motwani; Daniel S Berman; Guido Germano
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.166

Review 5.  Recent Advances and Trends in Pediatric Cardiac Imaging.

Authors:  Wadi Mawad; Luc L Mertens
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-02-21

6.  Radiomics to Identify High-Risk Atherosclerotic Plaque From Computed Tomography: The Power of Quantification.

Authors:  Damini Dey; Frederic Commandeur
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 7.792

7.  Integrated prediction of lesion-specific ischaemia from quantitative coronary CT angiography using machine learning: a multicentre study.

Authors:  Damini Dey; Sara Gaur; Kristian A Ovrehus; Piotr J Slomka; Julian Betancur; Markus Goeller; Michaela M Hell; Heidi Gransar; Daniel S Berman; Stephan Achenbach; Hans Erik Botker; Jesper Moller Jensen; Jens Flensted Lassen; Bjarne Linde Norgaard
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Multimodality imaging for the prevention of cardiovascular events: Coronary artery calcium and beyond.

Authors:  Duygu Kocyigit; Alexandra Scanameo; Bo Xu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-06

Review 9.  The value of noninvasive computed tomography derived fractional flow reserve in our current approach to the evaluation of coronary artery stenosis.

Authors:  Edward Hulten; Ron Blankstein; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.161

10.  Quantification of plaque characteristics detected by dual source computed tomography angiography to predict myocardial ischemia as assessed by single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Ting Liu; Xue Yuan; Congcong Wang; Mingfei Sun; Shiqi Jin; Xu Dai
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2019-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.