BACKGROUND: We aim to evaluate the relationship between quantitative plaque characteristics detected by dual-source computed tomography angiography (DSCTA) and myocardial ischemia as assessed by single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT-MPI). METHODS: In this study, 460 consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) underwent DSCTA and stress/rest SPECT-MPI, and 179 patients with coronary artery plaques were quantitatively analyzed. Quantitative coronary artery plaque measurements including total plaque volume, the volume of non-calcified plaque, calcified plaque volume, low-density noncalcified plaque volume, total plaque burden, calcified plaque burden, non-calcified plaque burden, low-density non-calcified plaque (LDNCP) burden, remodeling index, plaque length, maximum diameter stenosis were provided by the automated software (Release 5.6.5, Circle Cardiovascular Imaging, Canada). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the correlation between quantitative plaque characteristics and myocardial ischemia to determine if plaque characteristics were independent of clinical risk factors and significant CAD. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-nine patients (65% males) with suspected-CAD, undergoing DSCTA and stress/rest SPECT-MPI and single vessel ischemia were considered. There were significant correlations between quantitative assessment of plaque features and myocardial ischemia with details as follow: total plaque volume [25.2 (17.8-37.8) vs. 15.6 (10.3-24.9) mm3, P<0.001], calcified plaque volume (1.6±7.1 vs. 2.3±6.4 mm3, P=0.019), non-calcified plaque volume [23.6 (16.6-35.9) vs. 14.6 (10.3-22.8) mm3, P<0.001)], LDNCP volume [4.9 (2.1-8.2) vs. 2.2 (1.0-5.5) mm3, P=0.003], total plaque burden (47.6%±17.1% vs. 36.2%±17.3%, P=0.002), calcified plaque burden (1.5%±5.5% vs. 2.9%±6.9%, P=0.014), non-calcified plaque burden (46.1%±18.8% vs. 33.3%±16.4%, P=0.001), LDNCP burden [12.3% (6.4-17.7) vs. 3.3% (1.6-5.3), P<0.001], remodeling index [1.2 (1.1-1.4) vs. 1.0 (1.1-1.2), P<0.001], plaque length [4.0 (3.2-6.1) vs. 3.3 (2.8-3.8) mm, P=0.009], maximum diameter stenosis [18.1% (10.0-52.9) vs. 12.9% (6.5-18.5), P=0.011]. In a multivariate analysis, low-density noncalcified plaque burden (OR 1.33; 95% CI, 1.16-1.53, P<0.001) remained a significant predictor of myocardial ischemia after adjusting for stenosis ≥50% and gender. The area under curve (AUC) of the model containing LDNCP burden, stenosis ≥50% and gender was 0.875 (95% CI, 0.812-0.938), which was significantly better than the model with stenosis ≥50% and gender (AUC 0.729; 95% CI, 0.633-0.825). CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative plaque characteristics detected by DSCTA are independently correlated with the incidence of myocardial ischemia by SPECT-MPI in patients with suspected CAD.
BACKGROUND: We aim to evaluate the relationship between quantitative plaque characteristics detected by dual-source computed tomography angiography (DSCTA) and myocardial ischemia as assessed by single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT-MPI). METHODS: In this study, 460 consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) underwent DSCTA and stress/rest SPECT-MPI, and 179 patients with coronary artery plaques were quantitatively analyzed. Quantitative coronary artery plaque measurements including total plaque volume, the volume of non-calcified plaque, calcified plaque volume, low-density noncalcified plaque volume, total plaque burden, calcified plaque burden, non-calcified plaque burden, low-density non-calcified plaque (LDNCP) burden, remodeling index, plaque length, maximum diameter stenosis were provided by the automated software (Release 5.6.5, Circle Cardiovascular Imaging, Canada). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the correlation between quantitative plaque characteristics and myocardial ischemia to determine if plaque characteristics were independent of clinical risk factors and significant CAD. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-nine patients (65% males) with suspected-CAD, undergoing DSCTA and stress/rest SPECT-MPI and single vessel ischemia were considered. There were significant correlations between quantitative assessment of plaque features and myocardial ischemia with details as follow: total plaque volume [25.2 (17.8-37.8) vs. 15.6 (10.3-24.9) mm3, P<0.001], calcified plaque volume (1.6±7.1 vs. 2.3±6.4 mm3, P=0.019), non-calcified plaque volume [23.6 (16.6-35.9) vs. 14.6 (10.3-22.8) mm3, P<0.001)], LDNCP volume [4.9 (2.1-8.2) vs. 2.2 (1.0-5.5) mm3, P=0.003], total plaque burden (47.6%±17.1% vs. 36.2%±17.3%, P=0.002), calcified plaque burden (1.5%±5.5% vs. 2.9%±6.9%, P=0.014), non-calcified plaque burden (46.1%±18.8% vs. 33.3%±16.4%, P=0.001), LDNCP burden [12.3% (6.4-17.7) vs. 3.3% (1.6-5.3), P<0.001], remodeling index [1.2 (1.1-1.4) vs. 1.0 (1.1-1.2), P<0.001], plaque length [4.0 (3.2-6.1) vs. 3.3 (2.8-3.8) mm, P=0.009], maximum diameter stenosis [18.1% (10.0-52.9) vs. 12.9% (6.5-18.5), P=0.011]. In a multivariate analysis, low-density noncalcified plaque burden (OR 1.33; 95% CI, 1.16-1.53, P<0.001) remained a significant predictor of myocardial ischemia after adjusting for stenosis ≥50% and gender. The area under curve (AUC) of the model containing LDNCP burden, stenosis ≥50% and gender was 0.875 (95% CI, 0.812-0.938), which was significantly better than the model with stenosis ≥50% and gender (AUC 0.729; 95% CI, 0.633-0.825). CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative plaque characteristics detected by DSCTA are independently correlated with the incidence of myocardial ischemia by SPECT-MPI in patients with suspected CAD.
Authors: Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Waren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Joanne D Schuijf; William Wijns; J Wouter Jukema; Douwe E Atsma; Albert de Roos; Hildo J Lamb; Marcel P M Stokkel; Petra Dibbets-Schneider; Isabel Decramer; Pieter De Bondt; Ernst E van der Wall; Piet K Vanhoenacker; Jeroen J Bax Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2006-11-28 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Marcus Hacker; Tobias Jakobs; Nicolas Hack; Konstantin Nikolaou; Christoph Becker; Franz von Ziegler; Andreas Knez; Andreas König; Volker Klauss; Maximilian Reiser; Klaus Hahn; Reinhold Tiling Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2006-09-02 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Joëlla E van Velzen; Joanne D Schuijf; Jacob M van Werkhoven; Bernhard A Herzog; Aju P Pazhenkottil; Eric Boersma; Fleur R de Graaf; Arthur J Scholte; Lucia J Kroft; Albert de Roos; Marcel P Stokkel; J Wouter Jukema; Philipp A Kaufmann; Ernst E van der Wall; Jeroen J Bax Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2010-07-21 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Joseph A Ladapo; Farouc A Jaffer; Udo Hoffmann; Carey C Thomson; Fabian Bamberg; William Dec; David M Cutler; Milton C Weinstein; G Scott Gazelle Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-12-15 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Balaji K Tamarappoo; Ariel Gutstein; Victor Y Cheng; Ryo Nakazato; Heidi Gransar; Damini Dey; Louise E J Thomson; Sean W Hayes; John D Friedman; Guido Germano; Piotr J Slomka; Daniel S Berman Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2010-04-28 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: W Bob Meijboom; Matthijs F L Meijs; Joanne D Schuijf; Maarten J Cramer; Nico R Mollet; Carlos A G van Mieghem; Koen Nieman; Jacob M van Werkhoven; Gabija Pundziute; Annick C Weustink; Alexander M de Vos; Francesca Pugliese; Benno Rensing; J Wouter Jukema; Jeroen J Bax; Mathias Prokop; Pieter A Doevendans; Myriam G M Hunink; Gabriel P Krestin; Pim J de Feyter Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2008-12-16 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Julie M Miller; Carlos E Rochitte; Marc Dewey; Armin Arbab-Zadeh; Hiroyuki Niinuma; Ilan Gottlieb; Narinder Paul; Melvin E Clouse; Edward P Shapiro; John Hoe; Albert C Lardo; David E Bush; Albert de Roos; Christopher Cox; Jeffery Brinker; João A C Lima Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-11-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Matthew J Budoff; David Dowe; James G Jollis; Michael Gitter; John Sutherland; Edward Halamert; Markus Scherer; Raye Bellinger; Arthur Martin; Robert Benton; Augustin Delago; James K Min Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2008-11-18 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Borbála Vattay; Sarolta Borzsák; Melinda Boussoussou; Milán Vecsey-Nagy; Ádám L Jermendy; Ferenc I Suhai; Pál Maurovich-Horvat; Béla Merkely; Márton Kolossváry; Bálint Szilveszter Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-09-08