Literature DB >> 23562923

Computational fluid dynamics applied to cardiac computed tomography for noninvasive quantification of fractional flow reserve: scientific basis.

Charles A Taylor1, Timothy A Fonte, James K Min.   

Abstract

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) has emerged as a noninvasive method for direct visualization of coronary artery disease, with previous studies demonstrating high diagnostic performance of CTA compared with invasive coronary angiography. However, CTA assessment of coronary stenoses tends toward overestimation, and even among CTA-identified severe stenosis confirmed at the time of invasive coronary angiography, only a minority are found to be ischemia causing. Recent advances in computational fluid dynamics and image-based modeling now permit determination of rest and hyperemic coronary flow and pressure from CTA scans, without the need for additional imaging, modification of acquisition protocols, or administration of medications. These techniques have been used to noninvasively compute fractional flow reserve (FFR), which is the ratio of maximal coronary blood flow through a stenotic artery to the blood flow in the hypothetical case that the artery was normal, using CTA images. In the recently reported prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study and the DeFACTO (Determination of Fractional Flow Reserve by Anatomic Computed Tomographic Angiography) trial, FFR derived from CTA was demonstrated as superior to measures of CTA stenosis severity for determination of lesion-specific ischemia. Given the significant interest in this novel method for determining the physiological significance of coronary artery disease, we herein present a review on the scientific principles that underlie this technology.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23562923     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  248 in total

Review 1.  CT angiography in the diagnosis of cardiovascular disease: a transformation in cardiovascular CT practice.

Authors:  Zhonghua Sun; Mansour Al Moudi; Yan Cao
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2014-10

2.  A Framework for Comparing Vascular Hemodynamics at Different Points in Time.

Authors:  J Gounley; M Vardhan; A Randles
Journal:  Comput Phys Commun       Date:  2018-06-02       Impact factor: 4.390

Review 3.  Patient-Specific Modeling of Hemodynamics: Supporting Surgical Planning in a Fontan Circulation Correction.

Authors:  Theodorus M J van Bakel; Kevin D Lau; Jennifer Hirsch-Romano; Santi Trimarchi; Adam L Dorfman; C Alberto Figueroa
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Uncertainty quantification of simulated biomechanical stimuli in coronary artery bypass grafts.

Authors:  Justin S Tran; Daniele E Schiavazzi; Andrew M Kahn; Alison L Marsden
Journal:  Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 6.756

5.  Noninvasive fractional flow reserve measurement in stable CAD.

Authors:  H Ouyang; P A L Tonino
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.443

6.  Diagnostic performance of transluminal attenuation gradient and fractional flow reserve by coronary computed tomographic angiography (FFR(CT)) compared to invasive FFR: a sub-group analysis from the DISCOVER-FLOW and DeFACTO studies.

Authors:  Rine Nakanishi; Suguru Matsumoto; Anas Alani; Dong Li; Pieter H Kitslaar; Alexander Broersen; Bon-Kwon Koo; James K Min; Matthew J Budoff
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Quantification of tissue-engineered trachea performance with computational fluid dynamics.

Authors:  Lauren Eichaker; Chengyu Li; Nakesha King; Victoria Pepper; Cameron Best; Ekene Onwuka; Eric Heuer; Kai Zhao; Jonathan Grischkan; Christopher Breuer; Jed Johnson; Tendy Chiang
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Simultaneous evaluation of plaque stability and ischemic potential of coronary lesions in a fluid-structure interaction analysis.

Authors:  Xinlei Wu; Clemens von Birgelen; Su Zhang; Daixin Ding; Jiayue Huang; Shengxian Tu
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 9.  Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography for Screening in Patients with Diabetes: Can Enhanced Detection of Subclinical Coronary Atherosclerosis Improve Outcome?

Authors:  Joseph Brent Muhlestein; Fidela Ll Moreno
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 10.  CFR and FFR assessment with PET and CTA: strengths and limitations.

Authors:  Ryo Nakazato; Ran Heo; Jonathon Leipsic; James K Min
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.