Literature DB >> 29352380

Integrated prediction of lesion-specific ischaemia from quantitative coronary CT angiography using machine learning: a multicentre study.

Damini Dey1, Sara Gaur2, Kristian A Ovrehus2, Piotr J Slomka3, Julian Betancur3, Markus Goeller4,5, Michaela M Hell5, Heidi Gransar3, Daniel S Berman3, Stephan Achenbach5, Hans Erik Botker2, Jesper Moller Jensen2, Jens Flensted Lassen2, Bjarne Linde Norgaard2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate if lesion-specific ischaemia by invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) can be predicted by an integrated machine learning (ML) ischaemia risk score from quantitative plaque measures from coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA).
METHODS: In a multicentre trial of 254 patients, CTA and invasive coronary angiography were performed, with FFR in 484 vessels. CTA data sets were analysed by semi-automated software to quantify stenosis and non-calcified (NCP), low-density NCP (LD-NCP, < 30 HU), calcified and total plaque volumes, contrast density difference (CDD, maximum difference in luminal attenuation per unit area) and plaque length. ML integration included automated feature selection and model building from quantitative CTA with a boosted ensemble algorithm, and tenfold stratified cross-validation.
RESULTS: Eighty patients had ischaemia by FFR (FFR ≤ 0.80) in 100 vessels. Information gain for predicting ischaemia was highest for CDD (0.172), followed by LD-NCP (0.125), NCP (0.097), and total plaque volumes (0.092). ML exhibited higher area-under-the-curve (0.84) than individual CTA measures, including stenosis (0.76), LD-NCP volume (0.77), total plaque volume (0.74) and pre-test likelihood of coronary artery disease (CAD) (0.63); p < 0.006.
CONCLUSIONS: Integrated ML ischaemia risk score improved the prediction of lesion-specific ischaemia by invasive FFR, over stenosis, plaque measures and pre-test likelihood of CAD. KEY POINTS: • Integrated ischaemia risk score improved prediction of ischaemia over quantitative plaque measures • Integrated ischaemia risk score showed higher prediction of ischaemia than standard approach • Contrast density difference had the highest information gain to identify lesion-specific ischaemia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atherosclerotic plaque; Computed tomography angiography; Coronary stenosis; Ischaemia; Machine learning

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29352380      PMCID: PMC5940537          DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-5223-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  40 in total

1.  Prediction error estimation: a comparison of resampling methods.

Authors:  Annette M Molinaro; Richard Simon; Ruth M Pfeiffer
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-05-19       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Automated 3-dimensional quantification of noncalcified and calcified coronary plaque from coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  Damini Dey; Victor Y Cheng; Piotr J Slomka; Ryo Nakazato; Amit Ramesh; Swaminatha Gurudevan; Guido Germano; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2009-10-01

3.  Interpreting incremental value of markers added to risk prediction models.

Authors:  Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino; Karol M Pencina; A Cecile J W Janssens; Philip Greenland
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study.

Authors:  Bon-Kwon Koo; Andrejs Erglis; Joon-Hyung Doh; David V Daniels; Sanda Jegere; Hyo-Soo Kim; Allison Dunning; Tony DeFrance; Alexandra Lansky; Jonathan Leipsic; James K Min
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Atherosclerotic plaque characteristics by CT angiography identify coronary lesions that cause ischemia: a direct comparison to fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Hyung-Bok Park; Ran Heo; Bríain Ó Hartaigh; Iksung Cho; Heidi Gransar; Ryo Nakazato; Jonathon Leipsic; G B John Mancini; Bon-Kwon Koo; Hiromasa Otake; Matthew J Budoff; Daniel S Berman; Andrejs Erglis; Hyuk-Jae Chang; James K Min
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-01

6.  Automated three-dimensional quantification of noncalcified coronary plaque from coronary CT angiography: comparison with intravascular US.

Authors:  Damini Dey; Tiziano Schepis; Mohamed Marwan; Piotr J Slomka; Daniel S Berman; Stephan Achenbach
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Prediction of revascularization after myocardial perfusion SPECT by machine learning in a large population.

Authors:  Reza Arsanjani; Damini Dey; Tigran Khachatryan; Aryeh Shalev; Sean W Hayes; Mathews Fish; Rine Nakanishi; Guido Germano; Daniel S Berman; Piotr Slomka
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: the NXT trial (Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using CT Angiography: Next Steps).

Authors:  Bjarne L Nørgaard; Jonathon Leipsic; Sara Gaur; Sujith Seneviratne; Brian S Ko; Hiroshi Ito; Jesper M Jensen; Laura Mauri; Bernard De Bruyne; Hiram Bezerra; Kazuhiro Osawa; Mohamed Marwan; Christoph Naber; Andrejs Erglis; Seung-Jung Park; Evald H Christiansen; Anne Kaltoft; Jens F Lassen; Hans Erik Bøtker; Stephan Achenbach
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Machine learning for prediction of all-cause mortality in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a 5-year multicentre prospective registry analysis.

Authors:  Manish Motwani; Damini Dey; Daniel S Berman; Guido Germano; Stephan Achenbach; Mouaz H Al-Mallah; Daniele Andreini; Matthew J Budoff; Filippo Cademartiri; Tracy Q Callister; Hyuk-Jae Chang; Kavitha Chinnaiyan; Benjamin J W Chow; Ricardo C Cury; Augustin Delago; Millie Gomez; Heidi Gransar; Martin Hadamitzky; Joerg Hausleiter; Niree Hindoyan; Gudrun Feuchtner; Philipp A Kaufmann; Yong-Jin Kim; Jonathon Leipsic; Fay Y Lin; Erica Maffei; Hugo Marques; Gianluca Pontone; Gilbert Raff; Ronen Rubinshtein; Leslee J Shaw; Julia Stehli; Todd C Villines; Allison Dunning; James K Min; Piotr J Slomka
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Coronary plaque quantification and fractional flow reserve by coronary computed tomography angiography identify ischaemia-causing lesions.

Authors:  Sara Gaur; Kristian Altern Øvrehus; Damini Dey; Jonathon Leipsic; Hans Erik Bøtker; Jesper Møller Jensen; Jagat Narula; Amir Ahmadi; Stephan Achenbach; Brian S Ko; Evald Høj Christiansen; Anne Kjer Kaltoft; Daniel S Berman; Hiram Bezerra; Jens Flensted Lassen; Bjarne Linde Nørgaard
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 29.983

View more
  38 in total

Review 1.  Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Imaging: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  Damini Dey; Piotr J Slomka; Paul Leeson; Dorin Comaniciu; Sirish Shrestha; Partho P Sengupta; Thomas H Marwick
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Evaluation of fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina: can CT compete with angiography?

Authors:  Xin Liu; Yabin Wang; Heye Zhang; Youbing Yin; Kunlin Cao; Zhifan Gao; Huafeng Liu; William Kongto Hau; Lei Gao; Yundai Chen; Feng Cao; Wenhua Huang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Diagnostic performance of perivascular fat attenuation index to predict hemodynamic significance of coronary stenosis: a preliminary coronary computed tomography angiography study.

Authors:  Mengmeng Yu; Xu Dai; Jianhong Deng; Zhigang Lu; Chengxing Shen; Jiayin Zhang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Artificial intelligence in medical imaging: A radiomic guide to precision phenotyping of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Evangelos K Oikonomou; Musib Siddique; Charalambos Antoniades
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 10.787

Review 5.  Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Imaging for Risk Stratification in Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Andrew Lin; Márton Kolossváry; Manish Motwani; Ivana Išgum; Pál Maurovich-Horvat; Piotr J Slomka; Damini Dey
Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging       Date:  2021-02-25

6.  The best predictor of ischemic coronary stenosis: subtended myocardial volume, machine learning-based FFRCT, or high-risk plaque features?

Authors:  Mengmeng Yu; Zhigang Lu; Chengxing Shen; Jing Yan; Yining Wang; Bin Lu; Jiayin Zhang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Artificial intelligence in personalized cardiovascular medicine and cardiovascular imaging.

Authors:  Ikram-Ul Haq; Iqraa Haq; Bo Xu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-06

8.  Fractional flow reserve derived from CCTA may have a prognostic role in myocardial bridging.

Authors:  Fan Zhou; Chun Xiang Tang; U Joseph Schoepf; Christian Tesche; Maximilian J Bauer; Brian E Jacobs; Chang Sheng Zhou; Jing Yan; Meng Jie Lu; Guang Ming Lu; Long Jiang Zhang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography as a Gatekeeper to Coronary Revascularization: Emphasizing Atherosclerosis Findings Beyond Stenosis.

Authors:  Inge J van den Hoogen; Alexander R van Rosendael; Fay Y Lin; Jeroen J Bax; Leslee J Shaw; James K Min
Journal:  Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep       Date:  2019-05-14

10.  Development and application of artificial intelligence in cardiac imaging.

Authors:  Beibei Jiang; Ning Guo; Yinghui Ge; Lu Zhang; Matthijs Oudkerk; Xueqian Xie
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.