Literature DB >> 25895001

Contextual influence on the tilt after-effect in foveal and para-foveal vision.

Cheng Chen1, Xianghui Chen, Min Gao, Qiong Yang, Hongmei Yan.   

Abstract

A sensory stimulus can only be properly interpreted in light of the stimuli that surround it in space and time. The tilt illusion (TI) and tilt after-effect (TAE) provide good evidence that the perception of a target depends strongly on both its spatial and temporal context. In previous studies, the TI and TAE have typically been investigated separately, so little is known about their co-effects on visual perception and information processing mechanisms. Here, we considered the influence of the spatial context and the temporal effect together and asked how center-surround context affects the TAE in foveal and para-foveal vision. Our results showed that different center-surround spatial patterns significantly affected the TAE for both foveal and para-foveal vision. In the fovea, the TAE was mainly produced by central adaptive gratings. Cross-oriented surroundings significantly inhibited the TAE, and iso-oriented surroundings slightly facilitated it; surround inhibition was much stronger than surround facilitation. In the para-fovea, the TAE was mainly decided by the surrounding patches. Likewise, a cross-oriented central patch inhibited the TAE, and an iso-oriented one facilitated it, but there was no significant difference between inhibition and facilitation. Our findings demonstrated, at the perceptual level, that our visual system adopts different mechanisms to process consistent or inconsistent central-surround orientation information and that the unequal magnitude of surround inhibition and facilitation is vitally important for the visual system to improve the detectability or discriminability of novel or incongruent stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25895001      PMCID: PMC5563691          DOI: 10.1007/s12264-014-1521-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Bull        ISSN: 1995-8218            Impact factor:   5.203


  26 in total

1.  Center-surround interactions in foveal and peripheral vision.

Authors:  J Xing; D J Heeger
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Clustered organization of neurons with similar extra-receptive field properties in the primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Haishan Yao; Chao-Yi Li
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Effects on orientation perception of manipulating the spatio-temporal prior probability of stimuli.

Authors:  Kun Guo; Angel Nevado; Robert G Robertson; Maribel Pulgarin; Alexander Thiele; Malcolm P Young
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Dynamics of unconscious contextual effects in orientation processing.

Authors:  Isabelle Mareschal; Colin W G Clifford
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The influence of surround suppression on adaptation effects in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Stephanie C Wissig; Adam Kohn
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Tilt aftereffect and adaptation-induced changes in orientation tuning in visual cortex.

Authors:  Dezhe Z Jin; Valentin Dragoi; Mriganka Sur; H Sebastian Seung
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-08-31       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Selective attention and the active remapping of object features in trans-saccadic perception.

Authors:  David Melcher
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

9.  Spatiotopic neural representations develop slowly across saccades.

Authors:  Eckart Zimmermann; Maria Concetta Morrone; Gereon R Fink; David Burr
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Stochastic re-calibration: contextual effects on perceived tilt.

Authors:  Joshua A Solomon; Michael J Morgan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  2 in total

1.  Auditory to Visual Cross-Modal Adaptation for Emotion: Psychophysical and Neural Correlates.

Authors:  Xiaodong Wang; Xiaotao Guo; Lin Chen; Yijun Liu; Michael E Goldberg; Hong Xu
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  The Illusion of Uniformity Does Not Depend on the Primary Visual Cortex: Evidence From Sensory Adaptation.

Authors:  Marta Suárez-Pinilla; Anil K Seth; Warrick Roseboom
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2018-09-27
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.